Learning, Media and Technology
@lmt-journal.bsky.social
290 followers 38 following 50 posts
#LMT 🟨🟪 aims to stimulate debate on digital media, digital technology and digital cultures in education. Edited by @benpatrickwill.bsky.social, @johnpp.bsky.social, @discoursology.bsky.social‬ & @lucipangrazio.bsky.social.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨Volume 50, Issue 3 (2025) of LMT🟪

In this Special Issue, guest editors Ebben & Murphy present a collection of articles exploring pressing issues of #GenAI in #education, including new subjectivities, critical pedagogies, strategies of resistance & biases.

Read all articles: tinyurl.com/39p3b4um
Theorizing the Future of Generative AI
Edited by Maureen Ebben and Julien S. Murphy
The articles in this volume share a broader critical discourse with GenAI. While we cannot know what GenAI will mean for education in the long term, the dizzying pace at which it is being infused into educational practices demands new forms of theoretical research to assist us in not merely receiving these new tools as a fait accompli but to critically evaluate their use and contribute to their design. Presently, we find ourselves in a dialectical engagement with GenAI: as we train GenAI tools with our prompts, responses, and the creation of materials that LLMs require, we are unwittingly being trained by GenAI in specific and often unconscious ways. This reflects the interplay between humans and machines that the new materialists describe.
lmt-journal.bsky.social

🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this study Lindell & Stöhr explore near-future scenarios on how educators might respond to the challenges posed by #GenAI, as well as the limitations of what they can address independently, based on their own anticipations.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/muprzccu
Navigating generative AI in higher education – six near future scenarios
by Tiina Lindell & Christian Stöhr
ABSTRACT

This study investigates the impact of generative AI (GenAI) on higher engineering education through informed educational fiction. Based on educators’ predictions and analyzed through Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), the study presents six near-future scenarios. These illustrate both potential strategies and the challenges educators face in managing GenAI, including conflicting learning goals, excessive self-direction among students, unpredictable GenAI development, conflicting regulations, changing educators roles and interactions with students, and the forging and AI-ready campus. The results provide new insights into why GenAI might be challenging to manage in education, while also discussing how potential changes are not historically unprecedented. This study contributes to society and academia by offering empirically grounded future projections that reflect educators’ perceptions of managing GenAI. These projections can inform future interventions and support the development of alternative educational futures. In doing so, it advances the discussion on fiction-based research as a method for exploring complex technological transformations.
Reposted by Learning, Media and Technology
charleswlogan.bsky.social
I'm excited to (re)share work in @lmt-journal.bsky.social's latest issue.

The issue "pose[s] new questions and suggest[s] novel ways of thinking about GenAI and educational practice, serving as a provocation and inspiration to open up new agendas of inquiry and new directions for theory-building."
Theorizing the future of generative AI in education
Published in Learning, Media and Technology (Vol. 50, No. 3, 2025)
www.tandfonline.com
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper Eynon & Gillani argue that through research that attends to issues of criticality, philosophy, inclusivity, context, classification, and responsibility, computational methods can be valuable in critical EdTech studies.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/yv6utetf
Computational social science and critical studies of education and
technology: an improbable combination?
by Rebecca Eynon and Nabeel Gillani 
ABSTRACT

As belief around the potential of computational social science grows, fuelled by recent advances in machine learning, data scientists are ostensibly becoming the new experts in education. Scholars engaged in critical studies of education and technology have sought to interrogate the growing datafication of education yet tend not to use computational methods as part of this response. In this paper, we discuss the feasibility and desirability of the use of computational approaches as part of a critical research agenda. Presenting and reflecting upon two examples of projects that use computational methods in education to explore questions of equity and justice, we suggest that such approaches might help expand the capacity of critical researchers to highlight existing inequalities, make visible possible approaches for beginning to address such inequalities, and engage marginalised communities in designing and ultimately deploying these possibilities. Drawing upon work within the fields of Critical Data Studies and Science and Technology Studies, we further reflect on the two cases to discuss the possibilities and challenges of reimagining computational methods for critical research in education and technology, focusing on six areas of consideration: criticality, philosophy, inclusivity, context, classification, and responsibility.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper Corser, Manolev & Danby argue that ClassDojo is attempting to govern how teachers give uncontextualised feedback to students about their behaviour that becomes data points of managing discipline and control.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/d7k2racy
Problematising ClassDojo as a digital tool for behavior management and home-school communication
by Kristy Corser, Jamie Manolev and Susan Danby
ABSTRACT

ClassDojo is a popular educational technology platform used by teachers to manage students’ behaviour and communicate with parents. This platform, though, along with other similar digital classroom management tools, are subject to ongoing debate. This paper critically discusses the use of ClassDojo from different contexts across 3 studies that engaged in multiple data sources, including publicly available online discussion forums, polices and websites (study 1), interviews with teachers and families (study 1 and 2), classroom observations (study 2), and a parent/educator online survey (study 3). Drawing on Foucault's concept of pastoral power and data collected from these different contexts, we show that an app such as ClassDojo may be understood as a key instrument of a technologised pastorate within educational settings that provides a datafied form of behaviour judgement that is context free and technology reliant. We question the boundaries of educational technology, revealing the possible downfalls associated with such technology use in schools, and recommend that education stakeholders critically assess the effectiveness and suitability of digital tools.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper Parola and Grimaldi analyze the envisioning of AI-
based educational #robotics within #EdTech & robotics industry and the educational #timescape that is enacted through it.

Read more: tinyurl.com/46nsnfvt
The educational robotics imaginary. EdTech industry, educational
timescapes and the tyranny of connectivity
by Jessica Parola and Emiliano Grimaldi
ABSTRACT

EdTech industry is creating nowadays a multiform and yet powerful imaginary that makes educational robotics a ‘desirable necessity’. This article problematizes how this imaginary envisions a reconfiguration of the temporalities of education. Theoretically, we draw on the notions of imaginary and timescape to explore emerging robotically mediated educational temporalities and their rhythms, forms of time calculation, temporal relations and modalities. We analyze EdTech’s work of envisioning through a quantitative (Network Text Analysis) and qualitative methodology. We argue that it is possible to identify an envisioned robotically mediated educational temporality which is organized around four temporal logics: tech-driven instruction, connectivity, skill development, and educating to and for the future. Moreover, we critically discuss how through this temporal envisioning a particular kind of subject is positioned at the center of learning. This subject is enmeshed into paradoxes which we capture as the tyranny of connectivity. To conclude, we suggest possibilities to think differently a robotically mediated educational temporality.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

For this paper Linderoth, Mani, Schönborn, Hultén & Stenliden engaged teachers in co-design workshops to facilitate informed #speculation on possible futures for education in
the age of #AIED.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/yktz8u9j
Defining ‘the Force’ of artificial intelligence in education:
exploring the future of teaching through informed speculation
by Cornelia Linderoth, Mina Mani, Konrad Schönborn, Magnus Hultén & Linnéa Stenliden 
ABSTRACT

In the ‘Star Wars’ universe, the Force is a powerful energy that can be harnessed for good or evil. Similarly, artificial intelligence (AI) in education is often depicted as a transformative power capable of revolutionizing teaching and learning. This paper explores possible futures in education in relation to generative AI and predictive AI, using informed speculation to offer insights into the future. As our visions for tomorrow’s technology are being defined today, it is important to invite teachers to define the technology we should strive for. This paper presents two co-design workshops involving seven secondary-school teachers with diverse experiences and understandings of AI. Analysis of the workshop recordings informed three narrative episodes that center on lesson-planning in the future, the technical divide, and assessment agency. Education fiction is used as a mode for deep reflection on the results, staging scenarios and exploring the implications of AI in education. The results suggest that while teachers fear changes to their profession, they also offer constructive ideas for AI’s potential use. This informed speculation helps to elaborate on challenges and possibilities AI poses for teachers, providing important insights into how to harness AI effectively in teaching while avoiding techno-solutionism by broadening future perspectives.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper Baroutsis & Lingard offer a comparative analysis across three media strategies to illustrate how a range of different policy actors use both legacy and social media as policy instruments to influence education policy.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/k5w936rk
Understanding media influences on education policy in contexts
of changing digital media cultures
by Aspa Baroutsis and Bob Lingard 
ABSTRACT
This critical policy research paper considers the impact of media on
education policy, drawing on our empirical research that utilises print
and digital newspapers and social media datasets. We acknowledge the
broader social shifts in digital technology, advances in digitalisation and
datafication, which contribute to mediatisation and deep mediatisation.
In considering media/policy imbrications, we analyse three strategies
utilised by different actors in the construction of media messaging to
influence education policy. These are, celebrity as policy influencer,
organisation as mediapreneur, and media as message curators. These
actors include a football celebrity, Marcus Rashford, a mediapreneurial
international intergovernmental organisation, the OECD, and Australian
legacy media curation. The celebrity utilised social media activism to
directly change policy decisions; the OECD attempted to manage legacy
media reporting of PISA results to affect national policy responses and
used social media for policy awareness raising and dissemination; and
the Australian legacy media utilised their gatekeeper status to affect the
context of influence of policy development and helped constitute
discourses that frame policy. We conclude offering a comparative
analysis of the three strategies, as well as considering the contribution
of our research to the fields of policy sociology in education and media
and education policy.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper Apps, Beckman, Pawlicka & @drpaulkidson.bsky.social conceptualise school’s social media platforms as a fields of practice, affecting home and school relations.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/2pu7phhb
The nature of connection: parents’ experiences with school social
media
by Tiffani Apps, Karley Beckman, Nataszia Pawlicka and Paul Kidson
ABSTRACT

Contemporary schools have embraced the use of social media platforms, such as Facebook, to connect with parents, students, and the broader community. Despite an established body of critical research that highlights the power of platforms to shape social practice, there is a paucity of research that considers the impacts of school social media practice. This study employs a practice theory lens to examine school social media as practice with a focus on the platform together with the everyday situated experiences of parents. Through in-depth qualitative case studies, the paper aims to understand the experiences of six Australian parents as they manoeuvre within and across school, home and platform fields. Data were collected from an online questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and social media walkthroughs. Key findings highlighted tensions rather than connections at the intersection of home, school and social media. The obfuscated logic of the platform and limited space for parents to enact protective strategies within school structures amplified these tensions. The increasing concerns surrounding social media platforms and their impact on society, including the participants within this study, highlight the need for greater attention to the subtle ways in which schools, parents and children are implicated under the guise of connection.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨Volume 50, Issue 3 (2025) of LMT🟪

In this Special Issue, guest editors Ebben & Murphy present a collection of articles exploring pressing issues of #GenAI in #education, including new subjectivities, critical pedagogies, strategies of resistance & biases.

Read all articles: tinyurl.com/39p3b4um
Theorizing the Future of Generative AI
Edited by Maureen Ebben and Julien S. Murphy
The articles in this volume share a broader critical discourse with GenAI. While we cannot know what GenAI will mean for education in the long term, the dizzying pace at which it is being infused into educational practices demands new forms of theoretical research to assist us in not merely receiving these new tools as a fait accompli but to critically evaluate their use and contribute to their design. Presently, we find ourselves in a dialectical engagement with GenAI: as we train GenAI tools with our prompts, responses, and the creation of materials that LLMs require, we are unwittingly being trained by GenAI in specific and often unconscious ways. This reflects the interplay between humans and machines that the new materialists describe.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

As part of LMT's 20th anniversary, in this editorial eight current and former editors reflect on the journal's achievements and consider its future.

Read more: tinyurl.com/yk7k2hkf
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper @elinorcarmi.bsky.social & Nakou ask digital rights NGO practitioners about their experience on what mobilizes citizens to act against Big Tech & how data citizenship can offer possible ways forward for society to take.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/zzutf4xb
ABSTRACT

This paper explores what literacies people need to challenge big tech companies. We selected key digital rights practitioners, who mediate between policy and public awareness and have diverse experiences in working with people to critique and change the power asymmetries we have with big tech companies. Investigating how citizens can negotiate with big tech companies based on the experts’ insights highlighted the inequalities involved and how data literacy stands as a collective and structural barrier. Four key themes emerged from the interviews: contextual awareness, real or imagined concerns, who is responsible for creating and solving problems, and resistance possibilities. Drawing on the Data Citizenship framework, we show how these findings can be translated into civic action which involve different actors: government, Big-Tech, media, NGOs, and society. Importantly, we found it was difficult to imagine what an ‘ideal world’ would look like. Therefore, we argue that once we can imagine and verbalize how we want our data-driven future to look like, it will be easier to proactively strategize and work towards it.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this article Borgström, Karlsson & Lundahl utilise LLMs and computational text analysis to thematise a comprehensive textual database of all parliamentary speeches on independent schools in Sweden.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/4b8z762d
ABSTRACT

Over the past four decades, Sweden's education system has undergone a profound transformation, shifting from a centralised structure to a market-oriented model characterised by independent schools, deregulation, and competition. This paper introduces an innovative methodological approach to studying this transformation by applying computational text analysis with large language models (LLMs) to 45 years of parliamentary debates. By leveraging these methods and extensive parliamentary open data, we identify thematic patterns, ideological shifts, and policy discourses that have shaped the marketisation of Swedish education. Our methodological contribution lies in demonstrating how LLMs can be employed to scale up traditional discourse analysis, bridging the gap between computational methods and qualitative interpretative approaches. We engage critically with the challenges of algorithmic opacity, validation strategies, and interpretative transparency, addressing concerns about bias and the risks of black-boxed analyses. Combining machine-assisted text analysis with traditional qualitative methodologies, we present a scalable yet nuanced framework for studying education policy debates over time.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper Kelly argues that platforms reconfigure the parent–child relationship in the school context through regimes of hypervisibility and performativity that penetrate core educational values and engender new ways of being.

Read more: tinyurl.com/36zbw8xf
ABSTRACT

England’s state primary schools are settings characterised by intensive data production increasingly curated by digital platforms. While much research has focused on how datafication is reshaping schools and childhood, this study examines the impact of platformised systems on the parent–child relationship. Using Deleuze’s work on control societies, a comparative case study design was employed to explore parental and staff consciousness of data practices in primary education, their role in reshaping family values and the resultant sociocultural implications. Data was generated through interviews and documentary analysis of learning platform SeeSaw and its promotional materials. Results demonstrate that platformised education compels a profound shift in the interrelationships between parents, children and teachers by emphasising responsibilised over responsive practices of care. Accordingly, it reconfigures the parent–child relationship by escalating performative regimes with significant consequences for interfamily tension. These findings contribute to contemporary debates on the politics, problems and potential of data-driven approaches when raising and educating children.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this paper @philnichols.bsky.social, LeBlanc & @alliethrall.bsky.social offer ‘parametrization' to better capture the interplay of digital practices as territorialized and coded in different ways, across different scales.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/58m4zrdp
ABSTRACT

This conceptual article provides an outline of Manuel DeLanda’s concept of ‘parametrization' and its methodological possibilities for inquiry into emerging platform ecologies in education. Traditionally, education research has treated ‘the digital' as separate from the analog. However, transdisciplinary literature has shown how connective technologies blur these distinctions, expanding the scope of education research to include the interplay of social, technical, and political-economic relations within ‘the digital.' This complexity presents challenges for researchers in prioritizing aspects of these relations. To address this tension, we turn to DeLanda’s ‘parametrization' for setting inquiry parameters with ‘control knobs' to adjust the focus on relevant actors, activities, and interactions. By examining the influence of digital platforms like Google in educational settings, we illustrate how parametrization allows researchers to navigate scales and relations, offering insights into the nuanced impacts of digital technologies on teaching and learning practices.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨 New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In this article @amystorn.bsky.social & @rabani.bsky.social invite researchers to engage screencapture not only as a mode of data collection but as a site of inquiry – one that reflects, mediates, and conditions practice.

Read more: tinyurl.com/3rj9s8fj
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses critical and participatory approaches to
screencapture to account for the layered, embodied, and mobile ways
people work with/across screens in a postdigital era. While
screencapture methods have been a mainstay of multimodal, video-
based research in education, there has been less theorizing of screens
as active participants in broader sociotechnical assemblages. In this
paper, we theorize screencapture from a sociomaterial lens that frames
all activity as comprised of human and technological actors acting as
dynamic participants in sociotechnical systems. We propose three
approaches to screencapture – self-generated screencapture video,
researcher-generated screencapture, and elicited screencapture – as a
heuristic for researchers to look at and not through screens. Through
three case study examples of each approach to screencapture, we trace
five critical considerations: ethics, positionality, ephemerality, layering,
and co-construction. These critical considerations emerge differently
across the three approaches to screencapture, helping researchers
challenge extractive or voyeuristic procedures for recording screens in
educational research
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨New Publication in #LMT 🟪

Here @amandalevido.bsky.social, @aleeshajoy.bsky.social, @dezuanni.bsky.social & Woods report on a study, designed to raise understandings of how to teach children about algorithmic practices through practice-based workshops.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/2ucyf7na
ABSTRACT
Children in current times are likely to encounter algorithms, particularly
recommendation systems, as part of their everyday media experiences. In
this paper we consider children’s use of algorithms from a media literacy
perspective, namely through curatorship practices. We detail a pilot
workshop where children had opportunities to develop understandings
and critically reflect on algorithms through non-digital media production.
Children engaged in the process of curation through a series of activities
where they took photos and then curated these images in a variety of
ways. The activity provided opportunities for the children to critically
reflect on algorithms, specifically recommendation systems, in ways that
moved them beyond experience. One part of the pilot was to consider
the inter-relations evident between digital and more traditional texts,
materials and resources and the opportunities afforded when diverse
materials and tools are brought together in the one event. The pilot
explored different activities to help participants consider how algorithms
are part of, and impact, their everyday literacy and media practices.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨New Publication in #LMT 🟪

In their study Buntins, Bedenlier & @zawacki-richter.bsky.social show how syntheses in educational technology research are potential contributors to global imbalances in knowledge construction.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/3fjskh62
ABSTRACT
Research syntheses are an important approach to capture and synthesize
empirical studies in educational technology. However, despite their
proclaimed impartial summary of available research, imbalances exist as
to whose research is included due to publication language or in regard
to the visibility of entire scientific communities.
Using the concepts of academic hegemony and WEIRD research, a
bibliometric analysis is conducted in order to explore how research
syntheses of authors located in one of the so-called academic core
countries – the U.S.A. – are positioned in international comparison, and
how this potentially shapes the discourse on educational technology.
For the bibliometric analysis, a corpus with N = 446 research syntheses
is considered, comprised of 95 U.S.-authored and 351 non-U.S.-authored
syntheses. Findings reveal that U.S.-authored syntheses are relatively
self-referential and also draw heavily on databases of U.S.-based
professional societies in their literature search. Over half of the
syntheses cite other U.S.-based research, followed by Chilean, British,
Canadian, Australian and German research. In contrast, U.S.-authored
syntheses are cited globally, accentuating their perceived importance
and influence. Findings point to the need to consider underlying
influences and contextual factors for research syntheses in educational
technology, reflect on citation practices and generalizability of findings
from educational research.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
In their analysis of Stack Overflow threads Seredko, @thomashillman.bsky.social & Lundin illustrate how epistemic objects are locally produced as sociomaterial accomplishments and are intertwined with the broader material context of a professional domain.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/2pk34k2e
Collectively produced epistemic objects and their necessary
incompleteness for professional learning on a large-scale online
platform
ABSTRACT

This article presents a theoretical approach to examining professional knowledge practices on online platforms, employing the concept of epistemic objects and their incompleteness, and analysing how objects are actively produced and negotiated through interactions among users and the platform. We illustrate this approach by conducting an interaction analysis of two threads from Stack Overflow, a prominent online platform where millions of software developers ask and answer programming-related questions. The findings demonstrate that the incompleteness of epistemic objects is central to understanding how professionals collectively engage with and produce knowledge online. They also highlight the role of specific technical features of platforms and the embeddedness of objects – and, thereby, the platforms themselves – in the broader professional domain. The article discusses the potential of the theoretical approach for investigating online platforms as sites for professional learning and calls for educational programs and platform designs that support professionals’ engagements with epistemic objects.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
This new Special Issue will be officially launched and discussed during a launch event on March 27th 2025, 2:00-3:30 PM (UK time). Hosted by @srhe.bsky.social and facilitaded by guest editor @jkom.bsky.social.
Catch many of the authors during this webinar by registering here: tinyurl.com/mksr24dn
lmt-journal.bsky.social
🟨Volume 50, Issue 1 (2025) of LMT🟪

Let's introduce our new Special Issue! In their editorial
@jkom.bsky.social, @keanbirch.bsky.social & Sam Sellar intruduce the dynamics of #rentiership and #assetisation in the digitalisation of education.

Read all articles: tinyurl.com/a8bvzkxe
Learning, Media and Technology Mapping rentiership and assetisation in the digitalisation of education Edited by Janja Komljenovic, Kean Birch and Sam Sellar This special issue builds on emerging work on rentiership and assetisation in education to address the lack of analytical attention on these dynamics and to begin mapping a future research agenda for the field. To date, research in this field has introduced key concepts for understanding assetisation and has illuminated potential challenges for the digitalisation of higher education (Komljenovic 2021, 2022). Other areas of investigation include: how assetisation relates to other economic processes in education and how it remakes educational processes and subjects as com- modified entities (Grimaldi, Ball, and Peruzzo 2023); how automated interventions in education are calculated based on assetised resources (Hansen and Komljenovic 2023); the potential for, and challenges of, digital disruption in digital economies organised subject to assetised governance (Komljenovic et al. 2024a); the assetisation strategies of edupreneurs as they collaborate with edu- cation and research sectors (Ideland and Serder 2023); the futuring activities of EdTech investors (Komljenovic et al. 2023; Komljenovic, Sellar, and Birch 2024b; Williamson and Komljenovic 2023); and the translation of tuition fees into assets (Milyaeva and Neyland 2020)
lmt-journal.bsky.social
In this article @benpatrickwill.bsky.social, Celis, @arathings.bsky.social, Pykett & @kerifacer.bsky.social illuminate how #edtech investment is shaped through futuring methods that incorporate both data-driven and textual practices and technologies.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/3kpyd9yp
Algorithmic futuring: predictive infrastructures of valuation and investment in the assetization of edtech
by Ben Williamson, Carolina Valladares Celis, Arathi Sriprakash, Jessica Pykett and Keri Facer
ABSTRACT
Futures of education are increasingly defined through predictive
technologies and methods. We conceptualize ‘algorithmic futuring’ as
the use of data-driven digital methods and predictive infrastructures to
anticipate educational futures and animate actions in the present
towards their materialization. Specifically, we focus on algorithmic
futuring in the education technology investment industry, and the role
of predictive infrastructures of valuation and investment in the
assetization of edtech. Edtech investment actors make predictions
based on the calculated future asset value of digital technologies.
Methods and narratives of algorithmic futuring produced through
predictive infrastructures are intended to render an assetized future of
education seemingly attractive, attainable, and actionable. Our analysis
foregrounds three forms of algorithmic futuring practised by an edtech
investment organization: forecasting targets; managing uncertainty; and
provoking assetization. Each has significant impacts on what futures are
put into motion in the present, and exploit a gap in public investment
in edtech futures.
lmt-journal.bsky.social
In this study @annekovalainen.bsky.social & @poutanenseppo.bsky.social argue that the notion of #assetisation is crucial for understanding how states may function in shaping the epistemic foundation of education when transformed into sellable and rentable assets.

Read more (🔓): tinyurl.com/2aars72d
The state as an agency in the assetisation of knowledge: the case of the Finnish education export Anne Kovalainen and Seppo Poutanen ABSTRACT The assetisation of education explicates a major shift in how the state understands education. Education is not only an immaterial public good available to everybody but can be treated also as a promotable group of assets. This article discusses the case of a certain period in the Finnish education export. The analysis shows how the Finnish state with its governance tools is actively shaping and transforming education into asset, and through this process of assetisation becomes a certain kind of element in an education asset itself. In this process, the previous nature of education export ‘goods’ has been transformed to a modern rent-seeking ‘knowledge asset’, that can produce rent and excess value to both the state and businesses alike. When the state is involved in assetisation, the process is inherently politicised, and is exposed to potentially drastic polity changes.