conceding to far right ideas about the structure of society is conceding to a zero sum vision of the world, and more importantly giving voters a choice between two zero sum visions, where one is half hearted and the other is full throated. is it really a surprise then they choose the latter?

Feels like so many of our convos are revolving about how voters respond to what politicians are doing, or what parties’ positions on issues are, without much actual empirical sense of what they actually know about those topics.

Then, having agreed to that broad definition, you are deemed antisemitic if you do not support a state that prioritizes maintaining a Jewish voting majority above enfranchising everyone who lives in the territory it governs - without interrogating whether “self-determination” really demands that.