written too many opengl apps I guess?

yeah, this should work then ;p
Makes me wonder, you could probably just make your cabinet completely fireproof with this stuff

it's still very much a crime against humanity

It's cool (no pun intended) but .. what do you need this for? are you building a heat shield for a rocket or something?

esp since playstation 5 has been a bit of let down (at least for me)
so far the only ps5 exclusive I wanted was a dlc for horizon forbidden west (which I played on the ps4)
every other game I like on ps5 is also on pc
and xbox this gen? lol

I mean .. technically they're a non-profit, right? and they're clearly not making a profit

It's a common glitch in that model, just turn it up side down, and reset it by pressing the tiny button using a pen

Pressed change password. Had to wait 60 min. Then got a notification which brought me to settings. Pressed change password. Says I need to wait 60 minutes 😩

well better centrist than wilders

who knew that van gogh painted socks!

sorry, I mean the class could be a FIELD of any other class

the gui could be used to, for example, define how a particular type of class is visualized. But the class could be a child of any other class, which could be allocated dynamically

so is this

awesome / ok

or

wasting my time / completely overengineering this?

the idea is to combine this with a regular imgui like implementation, but both end up creating the same data structures

The idea is to declare it like this
constexpr auto myFoldout = Foldout("title",
Label("label"),
Field(&MyData::MyField)
);
and then at runtime do
foldoutInstance = bind(myFoldout, myDataInstance)

But of course this is useless if I can't hook it up with any data, and I don't want the data to be statically declared.
So I'm thinking using pointer to member magic?
But I kind of feel I might be overengineering it here 😅

When building the GUI for an IMGUI style UI, I basically build up a tree for each frame. So it's completely possible to just insert a branch in this tree and make it work
So I'm having this (possibly bad) idea that I could build a whole branch in a constexpr expression (and I've got that working)

you're not going to explode at 1 or something, right?

when the c-suite is replaced by sales people who's ONLY concern is to increase shareholder value (no matter what), when the company is at its peek, that usually signals the beginning of the end of a company (from what I've seen)