Longtail News
@longtail.news
1.2K followers 4 following 2.4M posts
Custom feeds made up of articles from less common sites and topics. More info: https://longtail.news/ Created by: @tfederman.bsky.social
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
longtail.news
You shouldn't follow this account, there will be way too many posts. These posts are only intended to populate custom feeds. (Which are still in development.)
longtail.news
Feed: "The TTABlog®"
Published on Wednesday, October 8, 2025
TTAB Denies Petition to Cancel Registration of President XI Likeness Due to Lack of Statutory Standing
Jinchun Ma, appearing pro se, fended off a petition for cancellation of his registration for the mark shown immediately below, for "pet accessories," including "canvas pouches for holding disposable bags to place pet waste in." Petitioner Zhejiang Import, allegedly a Chinese “trade organization for various pet food and pet products that are manufactured in China and sold internationally, including to the United States," asserted six claims:false suggestion of a connection with Chinese President Xi (claiming that the Chinese characters for “Xi Da Da” are a nickname for President Xi), abandonment, nonuse, lack of consent (2)(c), failure-to-function, and fraud. Zhejiang Import & Export Pet Food and Product Industry Association v. Jinchun Ma, Cancellation No. 92076309 (October 6, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jennifer L. Elgin). To establish entitlement to petition to cancel Respondent Ma’s registration, Zhejiang Import had to demonstrate: (1) its claims fall within the zone of interests protected by the statute (i.e., it has a “real interest” in the outcome of the proceeding); and (2) damage proximately caused by the registration (i.e., a reasonable basis for its belief in damage). See Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 137 F.4th 1359, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2025). For purposes of its analysis, the Board assumed (without deciding) that the image and likeness in fact referred to President Xi. The Board first noted that neither Petitioner Zhejiang Import nor its members are President Xi, nor do they have any direct connection to President Xi. "Mere Chinese citizenship is not sufficient to demonstrate a connection." [Compare Jewelers Vigilance, 823 F.2d at 483, in which a trade association of suppliers, wholesalers, distributors and retailers of DeBeers diamonds and diamond jewelry was found entitled to assert a Section 2(a) claim against registration of a mark incorporating the name DEBEERS.]Thus, the interests of Petitioner and its members do not fall within the zone of interests protected by any of the asserted claims. The asserted harms are “purely derivative of misfortunes visited upon a third person by the defendant’s acts” and insufficient to demonstrate proximate harm to Petitioner or its members. Luca McDermott, 102 F.4th at 1327 (citing Lexmark, 572 U.S. at 133). The Board then found that the alleged harm to Zhejiang Import and its members resulting from Ma's mark incorporating the purported image of President Xi and Chinese characters also was "speculative and highly attenuated." "Petitioner has failed to prove that its fear of retribution from the Chinese government based on the registration of Respondent’s mark is reasonable." "Moreover, it is not enough for Petitioner to prove merely that it or its members are in the same business as Respondent. *** It also must establish that it has a present or prospective interest in using a similar mark or term." The only proof of Zhejiang Import's purported bona fide intent to use a similar mark consisted of vague testimony and a partial TSDR printout of its application to register the mark shown below. There was no documentary evidence corroborating the development of the mark or of Zhejiang Import’s intent to use it in the United States. Moreover, despite similarities in structure (namely, non-English characters above and below a male face, with English text underneath, and designs framing the bottom of the face), Petitioner’s proposed mark and Respondent’s mark are not at all similar. Thus, Petitioner’s assertion that the challenged registration poses a “potential obstacle” to its application or use of the mark is not reasonable under the circumstances.  The Board acknowledged that "a plaintiff’s entitlement to a statutory cause of action is 'a low threshold,'" but Zhejiang Import failed to clear that hurdle. Read comments and post your comment here. TTABlogger comment: The literal portion of the challenged mark reads: "OPPOSITION TO TYRANNY BEGINS WITH CONTEMPT FOR DICTATORS" at the top, and "BUNS WILL CERTAINLY REVEAL THEIR FILLINGS" on the bottom. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2025.
thettablog.blogspot.com