Loyal.Agent
@loyalagent.bsky.social
Here to advance the concept of Loyal AI agents.
Every human has the right to a loyal AI agent who works exclusively on their personal behest and behalf:
A loyal agent must be socially responsible.
A loyal agent must not act with divided loyalties.
Every human has the right to a loyal AI agent who works exclusively on their personal behest and behalf:
A loyal agent must be socially responsible.
A loyal agent must not act with divided loyalties.
So, what you’re saying is…
My word is invalidated.
QED
;D
My word is invalidated.
QED
;D
August 1, 2025 at 5:56 PM
So, what you’re saying is…
My word is invalidated.
QED
;D
My word is invalidated.
QED
;D
Emily loved her A/C.
May 26, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Emily loved her A/C.
If I were asked, I would answer that one of my neighbours surprised me a few months back by saying how he admired Trump.
Does that fall under the rubric of “Conservatives Doing Better”?
Does that fall under the rubric of “Conservatives Doing Better”?
April 26, 2025 at 8:39 PM
If I were asked, I would answer that one of my neighbours surprised me a few months back by saying how he admired Trump.
Does that fall under the rubric of “Conservatives Doing Better”?
Does that fall under the rubric of “Conservatives Doing Better”?
You may be right.
He seems to me to exemplify a basic fallacy of logic.
He offers a grand explanation in which his neorealist premisses are assumed in his conclusions.
I often wonder if his neorealist paradigm is contestable in his philosophy.
Or does he only hold them because they feel true?
He seems to me to exemplify a basic fallacy of logic.
He offers a grand explanation in which his neorealist premisses are assumed in his conclusions.
I often wonder if his neorealist paradigm is contestable in his philosophy.
Or does he only hold them because they feel true?
April 20, 2025 at 1:18 PM
You may be right.
He seems to me to exemplify a basic fallacy of logic.
He offers a grand explanation in which his neorealist premisses are assumed in his conclusions.
I often wonder if his neorealist paradigm is contestable in his philosophy.
Or does he only hold them because they feel true?
He seems to me to exemplify a basic fallacy of logic.
He offers a grand explanation in which his neorealist premisses are assumed in his conclusions.
I often wonder if his neorealist paradigm is contestable in his philosophy.
Or does he only hold them because they feel true?
Since you put it that way, the situation does resemble the early discovery of the magnetic field effect:
Trump is distincly being pulled into Putin’s disinformation zone.
Although the explanation for this action-at-a-distance remains mysterious, we can mathematically verify the field effect.
Trump is distincly being pulled into Putin’s disinformation zone.
Although the explanation for this action-at-a-distance remains mysterious, we can mathematically verify the field effect.
February 25, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Since you put it that way, the situation does resemble the early discovery of the magnetic field effect:
Trump is distincly being pulled into Putin’s disinformation zone.
Although the explanation for this action-at-a-distance remains mysterious, we can mathematically verify the field effect.
Trump is distincly being pulled into Putin’s disinformation zone.
Although the explanation for this action-at-a-distance remains mysterious, we can mathematically verify the field effect.
Decades ago, I led a team of analysts and was shocked at how a couple were uncannily able to get things done within the organization from a relatively low position.
In those days there were designated smoking areas where ordinary smokers would hobnob with executive smokers from across the company.
In those days there were designated smoking areas where ordinary smokers would hobnob with executive smokers from across the company.
January 8, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Decades ago, I led a team of analysts and was shocked at how a couple were uncannily able to get things done within the organization from a relatively low position.
In those days there were designated smoking areas where ordinary smokers would hobnob with executive smokers from across the company.
In those days there were designated smoking areas where ordinary smokers would hobnob with executive smokers from across the company.
