Here there is clearly a misalignment with the terminology used by neuroscientists where what you call structural would be functional and what you call functional would be effective. These discrepancies do not help for sure.

I think of functional connectivity as per the definition of Friston who clearly describes three types connectivities: structural, functional (statistical dependencies) and effective connectivity (possibly causal). In this respect I think there is no confusion.

I missed this post. Could you please add me? Many thanks!

Try cse from sympy (common subsequence elimination) or talk to your FOSS colleagues for something smarter :)

The THE (www.timeshighereducation.com/news/around-...) suggests Sussex is the 80th university known to announce cuts... It is sector wide!

This is the bit that really confuses me about this dichotomy between oscillatory and aperiodic. Are we saying that at a given frequency only a fraction of that power is down to ‘oscillations’ and the rest is aperiodic but with power at that frequency?

Great topic. I’d like to be added please.