@lucypoof.bsky.social
I'm truly sorry, but I think a lot of people confuse "cub" with "babyfur" art. I agree that cubart in any sexual way is wrong. But babyfur art is never sexual/suggestive. If we say that babyfur art is just wrong then so is this:
January 30, 2026 at 3:34 PM
I'm truly sorry, but I think a lot of people confuse "cub" with "babyfur" art. I agree that cubart in any sexual way is wrong. But babyfur art is never sexual/suggestive. If we say that babyfur art is just wrong then so is this:
That's just babyfur art. What's nsfw about that?
January 30, 2026 at 9:34 AM
That's just babyfur art. What's nsfw about that?
The art in question is litterly babyfur art. A baby version of his sona doing absolutely nothing sexual.
People don't investigate or question Beta after hearing Peeby just saying "He likes cub art" without context. PB always hated ABDL in general. People instantly hate on Beta without questioning..
People don't investigate or question Beta after hearing Peeby just saying "He likes cub art" without context. PB always hated ABDL in general. People instantly hate on Beta without questioning..
January 13, 2026 at 9:58 AM
The art in question is litterly babyfur art. A baby version of his sona doing absolutely nothing sexual.
People don't investigate or question Beta after hearing Peeby just saying "He likes cub art" without context. PB always hated ABDL in general. People instantly hate on Beta without questioning..
People don't investigate or question Beta after hearing Peeby just saying "He likes cub art" without context. PB always hated ABDL in general. People instantly hate on Beta without questioning..
It's litterly a drawing of his sona as a baby in a diaper. Nothing sexual going on.
January 12, 2026 at 10:34 PM
It's litterly a drawing of his sona as a baby in a diaper. Nothing sexual going on.
I'll stop arguing about ABDL being wrong, let's agree to disagree on that. It's all adult, no kids included, promise.
But still, if showing an inflatable life jacket is wrong, then it's even more wrong of PB showing diaperfurs and all sorts of other kinks in his content and skits, even as a joke.
But still, if showing an inflatable life jacket is wrong, then it's even more wrong of PB showing diaperfurs and all sorts of other kinks in his content and skits, even as a joke.
January 12, 2026 at 10:30 PM
I'll stop arguing about ABDL being wrong, let's agree to disagree on that. It's all adult, no kids included, promise.
But still, if showing an inflatable life jacket is wrong, then it's even more wrong of PB showing diaperfurs and all sorts of other kinks in his content and skits, even as a joke.
But still, if showing an inflatable life jacket is wrong, then it's even more wrong of PB showing diaperfurs and all sorts of other kinks in his content and skits, even as a joke.
We all dislike pedo's. It's wrong.
But the ABDL furries are all adults, concenting with eachother. No kids involved. And if there's an art piece of a baby furry, it's non sexual.
But the ABDL furries are all adults, concenting with eachother. No kids involved. And if there's an art piece of a baby furry, it's non sexual.
January 12, 2026 at 2:31 PM
We all dislike pedo's. It's wrong.
But the ABDL furries are all adults, concenting with eachother. No kids involved. And if there's an art piece of a baby furry, it's non sexual.
But the ABDL furries are all adults, concenting with eachother. No kids involved. And if there's an art piece of a baby furry, it's non sexual.
The "cub art" in question is litterly a baby wolf in a diaper. Sitting. Nothing sexual. Just a cartoon baby animal.
Peeby calls everything that is baby-fur "cub art".
Peeby calls everything that is baby-fur "cub art".
January 12, 2026 at 2:27 PM
The "cub art" in question is litterly a baby wolf in a diaper. Sitting. Nothing sexual. Just a cartoon baby animal.
Peeby calls everything that is baby-fur "cub art".
Peeby calls everything that is baby-fur "cub art".