You can just give money to charity. It doesn’t have to based on fucked up beliefs about race science and the future of humanity.

Yeah, no. No one disagrees with giving to effective charities. But if in 2025 you are still aligning yourself with the EA label, you are choosing to support a movement founded by eugenicists, lousy with eugenicists, and rooted In eugenic ideologies.

The EA/long-termism/eugenics Venn diagram is just a circle.

Your commitment to tendentiously misreading your interlocutors despite them repeatedly pointing out your straw person is truly remarkable.

Alternatively, you could try the correlative conjunction of "not only... but also." For example, "Not only are claims of massive fraud by Elon Musk and President Donald Trump at odds with reams of audits and reports, but also the biggest examples of allegedly wasteful spending have been inaccurate."

WaPo, the coordinating conjunction "but" is used to introduce a contrasting idea or statement, signaling a shift in thought or a qualification of what was previously said. In this instance, where both of your statements indicate that Trump and Musk are lying, you should use "and."

The problem is abortion restrictions. Getting rid of abortion restrictions fixes the problem.

MSDOS Lexis was the best version, and it has all been downhill since. I still remember all the 2 letter commands.

details?

VERY close contest between him and Lee Fang.