Luna
@lunnova.dev
Would hedgedoc.org fit your usecase?
HedgeDoc - Ideas grow better together
Ideas grow better together
hedgedoc.org
November 25, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Would hedgedoc.org fit your usecase?
That's fair.
I've gone for a fairly large rework and a new section in the post, care to check if it does a better job?
lunnova.dev/articles/if-...
I've gone for a fairly large rework and a new section in the post, care to check if it does a better job?
lunnova.dev/articles/if-...
November 25, 2025 at 3:01 AM
That's fair.
I've gone for a fairly large rework and a new section in the post, care to check if it does a better job?
lunnova.dev/articles/if-...
I've gone for a fairly large rework and a new section in the post, care to check if it does a better job?
lunnova.dev/articles/if-...
reforestation is fairly classically considered geoengineering, it's actually one of the first items on the geoengineering wikipedia page, not trying to mislead there.
I think it probably doesn't come to mind because it's not argued over much, anyone sensible thinks reforesting is a great idea.
I think it probably doesn't come to mind because it's not argued over much, anyone sensible thinks reforesting is a great idea.
![https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering
Methods
Carbon dioxide removal
This section is an excerpt from Carbon dioxide removal.[edit]
Planting trees is a nature-based way to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere; however, the effect may only be temporary in some cases.[9][10]
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is a process in which carbon dioxide (CO2) is removed from the atmosphere by deliberate human activities and durably stored in geological, terrestrial, or ocean reservoirs, or in products.[11]: 2221 This process is also known as carbon removal, greenhouse gas removal or negative emissions. CDR is more and more often integrated into climate policy, as an element of climate change mitigation strategies.[12][13] Achieving net zero emissions will require first and foremost deep and sustained cuts in emissions, and then—in addition—the use of CDR ("CDR is what puts the net into net zero emissions" [14]). In the future, CDR may be able to counterbalance emissions that are technically difficult to eliminate, such as some agricultural and industrial emissions.[15]: 114
CDR includes methods that are implemented on land or in aquatic systems. Land-based methods include afforestation, reforestation, agricultural practices that sequester carbon in soils (carbon farming), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and direct air capture combined with storage](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j3hvz7sryv6ese4nuug2djn7/bafkreigaoqsqh7fiyy7xqwelnchtnkdpjscalaz7mvetqvr5skgcr6njlq@jpeg)
November 25, 2025 at 2:33 AM
reforestation is fairly classically considered geoengineering, it's actually one of the first items on the geoengineering wikipedia page, not trying to mislead there.
I think it probably doesn't come to mind because it's not argued over much, anyone sensible thinks reforesting is a great idea.
I think it probably doesn't come to mind because it's not argued over much, anyone sensible thinks reforesting is a great idea.
Wow, I missed the mark there. That we should shut down the coal mines, stop extracting more oil as priority seems so obvious yet I didn't put it down.
If you can read my post and walk away thinking I support the petrochem complex I've failed utterly.
Thanks for the input.
If you can read my post and walk away thinking I support the petrochem complex I've failed utterly.
Thanks for the input.
November 25, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Wow, I missed the mark there. That we should shut down the coal mines, stop extracting more oil as priority seems so obvious yet I didn't put it down.
If you can read my post and walk away thinking I support the petrochem complex I've failed utterly.
Thanks for the input.
If you can read my post and walk away thinking I support the petrochem complex I've failed utterly.
Thanks for the input.
If someone sells geoengineering as an easy solution that lets them sacrifice nothing to deal with climate change that's sus.
It's lemon difficult, and something we might be obligated to do anyway because we've blown past all emission targets and are already seeing unsurvivable temperatures
It's lemon difficult, and something we might be obligated to do anyway because we've blown past all emission targets and are already seeing unsurvivable temperatures
November 24, 2025 at 2:25 PM
If someone sells geoengineering as an easy solution that lets them sacrifice nothing to deal with climate change that's sus.
It's lemon difficult, and something we might be obligated to do anyway because we've blown past all emission targets and are already seeing unsurvivable temperatures
It's lemon difficult, and something we might be obligated to do anyway because we've blown past all emission targets and are already seeing unsurvivable temperatures
Adjacent to this I'd also push for funding copycat efforts of things like the tokyo resilience project in large cities most at risk of severe flooding due to climate change, we made this mess and we should have to help deal with the consequences.
www.architecturelab.net/tokyo-has-th...
www.architecturelab.net/tokyo-has-th...
How Tokyo Built World’s Largest Underground Water Tank For Flood Protection
The Metropolitan Area Outer Underground Discharge Channel (Japanese: 首都圏外郭放水路, Hepburn: Shutoken Gaikaku Hōsuiro), commonly known as Tokyo G-Cans, is the
www.architecturelab.net
November 24, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Adjacent to this I'd also push for funding copycat efforts of things like the tokyo resilience project in large cities most at risk of severe flooding due to climate change, we made this mess and we should have to help deal with the consequences.
www.architecturelab.net/tokyo-has-th...
www.architecturelab.net/tokyo-has-th...
Yeah! Geoengineering ranges from mundane to weird:
- reforestation/afforestation
- ocean fertilisation: encouraging phytoplankton blooms with iron/urea
- stratospheric aerosol injection; preferably short lived
- there are sensational proposals around giant solar reflectors, more scifi than viable
- reforestation/afforestation
- ocean fertilisation: encouraging phytoplankton blooms with iron/urea
- stratospheric aerosol injection; preferably short lived
- there are sensational proposals around giant solar reflectors, more scifi than viable
A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise
Current mainstream mitigation measures may be insufficient to halt sea-level rise, implying that radical measures may be required. Geoengineering—whic…
www.sciencedirect.com
November 24, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Yeah! Geoengineering ranges from mundane to weird:
- reforestation/afforestation
- ocean fertilisation: encouraging phytoplankton blooms with iron/urea
- stratospheric aerosol injection; preferably short lived
- there are sensational proposals around giant solar reflectors, more scifi than viable
- reforestation/afforestation
- ocean fertilisation: encouraging phytoplankton blooms with iron/urea
- stratospheric aerosol injection; preferably short lived
- there are sensational proposals around giant solar reflectors, more scifi than viable
> _ is simpler than deploying gitlab properly
There's little that isn't simpler than deploying gitlab properly, it's as if they don't want you self hosting.
It was bad a decade ago and seems like it's only gotten worse.
There's little that isn't simpler than deploying gitlab properly, it's as if they don't want you self hosting.
It was bad a decade ago and seems like it's only gotten worse.
November 24, 2025 at 1:45 PM
> _ is simpler than deploying gitlab properly
There's little that isn't simpler than deploying gitlab properly, it's as if they don't want you self hosting.
It was bad a decade ago and seems like it's only gotten worse.
There's little that isn't simpler than deploying gitlab properly, it's as if they don't want you self hosting.
It was bad a decade ago and seems like it's only gotten worse.
but checking my notes... we're subsidizing coal again and cancelling solar projects. great. so we aren't even getting the easy parts and not backsliding right.
Can be hard to stay hopeful.
Can be hard to stay hopeful.
November 24, 2025 at 1:42 PM
but checking my notes... we're subsidizing coal again and cancelling solar projects. great. so we aren't even getting the easy parts and not backsliding right.
Can be hard to stay hopeful.
Can be hard to stay hopeful.
> haven't been to the moon in 50 years
;-;
Shame we considered the red scare reason to push space but not scienctific progress :C
I see geoengineering as something developed nations should be obligated to do, at great expense and effort, to avoid making climate refugees of huge parts of the world.
;-;
Shame we considered the red scare reason to push space but not scienctific progress :C
I see geoengineering as something developed nations should be obligated to do, at great expense and effort, to avoid making climate refugees of huge parts of the world.
November 24, 2025 at 1:40 PM
> haven't been to the moon in 50 years
;-;
Shame we considered the red scare reason to push space but not scienctific progress :C
I see geoengineering as something developed nations should be obligated to do, at great expense and effort, to avoid making climate refugees of huge parts of the world.
;-;
Shame we considered the red scare reason to push space but not scienctific progress :C
I see geoengineering as something developed nations should be obligated to do, at great expense and effort, to avoid making climate refugees of huge parts of the world.
If you want something serious on keeping this world livable I can recommend Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson.
November 24, 2025 at 12:01 PM
If you want something serious on keeping this world livable I can recommend Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson.
Not really intended as serious commentary, it's more "saw two people arguing about whether degrowthers can build housing, determined both were using very different ideas of what the term means, rewrote a half century old speech to get it out of my skull" commentary.
November 24, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Not really intended as serious commentary, it's more "saw two people arguing about whether degrowthers can build housing, determined both were using very different ideas of what the term means, rewrote a half century old speech to get it out of my skull" commentary.
The second type is meant more as a quite extreme extrapolation of what detractors think, the sort of view of a position that someone who doesn't talk much with its proponents holds.
November 24, 2025 at 12:01 PM
The second type is meant more as a quite extreme extrapolation of what detractors think, the sort of view of a position that someone who doesn't talk much with its proponents holds.
Wasn't originally planning to post this one here, blame @erikmcclure.com :P
I'm hoping to have a post up soon on some issues with AMD's GPU compute ecosystem if I can survive its writing process.
I'm hoping to have a post up soon on some issues with AMD's GPU compute ecosystem if I can survive its writing process.
November 23, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Wasn't originally planning to post this one here, blame @erikmcclure.com :P
I'm hoping to have a post up soon on some issues with AMD's GPU compute ecosystem if I can survive its writing process.
I'm hoping to have a post up soon on some issues with AMD's GPU compute ecosystem if I can survive its writing process.
Reposted by Luna
The only reason I haven’t moved to another PDS is I want the emergency option to migrate back here
July 11, 2025 at 9:05 PM
The only reason I haven’t moved to another PDS is I want the emergency option to migrate back here
AWS IAM: Extremely inconsistent support for cross-account access.
Whether you must use AssumeRole into another account or can directly grant cross account access with a resource-based policy varies wildly, even within a single service.
Whether you must use AssumeRole into another account or can directly grant cross account access with a resource-based policy varies wildly, even within a single service.
July 11, 2025 at 5:24 PM
AWS IAM: Extremely inconsistent support for cross-account access.
Whether you must use AssumeRole into another account or can directly grant cross account access with a resource-based policy varies wildly, even within a single service.
Whether you must use AssumeRole into another account or can directly grant cross account access with a resource-based policy varies wildly, even within a single service.
> I don’t think this has any real practical implications.
Wondering if any runtimes/libs would treat `VAR` with no = as that var being set, allowing some sort of vuln or misbehavior in mixed-language programs where one part thinks it set, another doesn't.
Probably not, ≈everything calls libc?
Wondering if any runtimes/libs would treat `VAR` with no = as that var being set, allowing some sort of vuln or misbehavior in mixed-language programs where one part thinks it set, another doesn't.
Probably not, ≈everything calls libc?
July 10, 2025 at 9:11 PM
> I don’t think this has any real practical implications.
Wondering if any runtimes/libs would treat `VAR` with no = as that var being set, allowing some sort of vuln or misbehavior in mixed-language programs where one part thinks it set, another doesn't.
Probably not, ≈everything calls libc?
Wondering if any runtimes/libs would treat `VAR` with no = as that var being set, allowing some sort of vuln or misbehavior in mixed-language programs where one part thinks it set, another doesn't.
Probably not, ≈everything calls libc?