Lynn Ze Fahrrad
@lynnzegreyt.bsky.social
Oh, now it`s my attention span and not my reading comprehension?
And for the 5th time, in the literal next sentence I guessed your context correctly. Yet you still got upset about it.
Snowflake.
Enjoy your block.
And for the 5th time, in the literal next sentence I guessed your context correctly. Yet you still got upset about it.
Snowflake.
Enjoy your block.
December 6, 2025 at 6:36 PM
Oh, now it`s my attention span and not my reading comprehension?
And for the 5th time, in the literal next sentence I guessed your context correctly. Yet you still got upset about it.
Snowflake.
Enjoy your block.
And for the 5th time, in the literal next sentence I guessed your context correctly. Yet you still got upset about it.
Snowflake.
Enjoy your block.
Oh, now we`re debating what you hypothetically COULD`VE said now?
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
December 6, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Oh, now we`re debating what you hypothetically COULD`VE said now?
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
December 6, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Oh, now we`re debating what you hypothetically COULD`VE said now?
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
December 6, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Don`t need to.
I`m mentally well.
Unlike you.
I`m mentally well.
Unlike you.
December 6, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Don`t need to.
I`m mentally well.
Unlike you.
I`m mentally well.
Unlike you.
Oh, now we`re debating what you hypothetically COULD`VE said now?
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
December 6, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Oh, now we`re debating what you hypothetically COULD`VE said now?
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
Yeah, you`re totally not changing the subject-matter.
I don`t care whether I failed your imaginary test.
You`ve been blabbering on about me asking you about the meaning of your non-sentence for like 10 Minutes.
You clearly have nothing of substance to say so you try to hide that by distracting from my initial point.
You`ve been blabbering on about me asking you about the meaning of your non-sentence for like 10 Minutes.
You clearly have nothing of substance to say so you try to hide that by distracting from my initial point.
December 6, 2025 at 6:28 PM
I don`t care whether I failed your imaginary test.
You`ve been blabbering on about me asking you about the meaning of your non-sentence for like 10 Minutes.
You clearly have nothing of substance to say so you try to hide that by distracting from my initial point.
You`ve been blabbering on about me asking you about the meaning of your non-sentence for like 10 Minutes.
You clearly have nothing of substance to say so you try to hide that by distracting from my initial point.
Again, that is NOT what you said:
You said "you clearly don`t."
You said "you clearly don`t."
I don`t think my reading comprehension is the issue here.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
December 6, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Again, that is NOT what you said:
You said "you clearly don`t."
You said "you clearly don`t."
Again:
bsky.app/profile/lynn...
bsky.app/profile/lynn...
I don`t think my reading comprehension is the issue here.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
December 6, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Again:
bsky.app/profile/lynn...
bsky.app/profile/lynn...
Again, that is NOT what you said.
December 6, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Again, that is NOT what you said.
That´s what I wanna ask you.
1. You didn`t ask me why, you asked me how.
2. Why did you ask that?
Well, sHouLdn`t tHaT bE veRy obviOuS?? tHinK verY hArd.
1. You didn`t ask me why, you asked me how.
2. Why did you ask that?
Well, sHouLdn`t tHaT bE veRy obviOuS?? tHinK verY hArd.
December 6, 2025 at 6:18 PM
That´s what I wanna ask you.
1. You didn`t ask me why, you asked me how.
2. Why did you ask that?
Well, sHouLdn`t tHaT bE veRy obviOuS?? tHinK verY hArd.
1. You didn`t ask me why, you asked me how.
2. Why did you ask that?
Well, sHouLdn`t tHaT bE veRy obviOuS?? tHinK verY hArd.
You didn`t say "You clearly don’t know it means".
You said "you clearly don`t", which can refer to anything, but I still guessed correctly what it meant. So what is even your problem here?
You said "you clearly don`t", which can refer to anything, but I still guessed correctly what it meant. So what is even your problem here?
December 6, 2025 at 6:15 PM
You didn`t say "You clearly don’t know it means".
You said "you clearly don`t", which can refer to anything, but I still guessed correctly what it meant. So what is even your problem here?
You said "you clearly don`t", which can refer to anything, but I still guessed correctly what it meant. So what is even your problem here?
How WHAT?
Again, please form a proper question.
Again, please form a proper question.
December 6, 2025 at 6:11 PM
How WHAT?
Again, please form a proper question.
Again, please form a proper question.
I don`t think my reading comprehension is the issue here.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
December 6, 2025 at 6:07 PM
I don`t think my reading comprehension is the issue here.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
It`s rather that you`re unable to articulate yourself properly.
Don`t what?
Understand what a reductio ad absurdum is?
Seriously, is that your best response?
Understand what a reductio ad absurdum is?
Seriously, is that your best response?
December 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Don`t what?
Understand what a reductio ad absurdum is?
Seriously, is that your best response?
Understand what a reductio ad absurdum is?
Seriously, is that your best response?
Mate, do you know what a reductio ad absurdum is?
If not, google it.
If not, google it.
December 6, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Mate, do you know what a reductio ad absurdum is?
If not, google it.
If not, google it.
How many sexes exist is DIRECTLY CONCLUDED from the given definition.
If your definition leads to the conclusion that Intersex or sterile people don`t fit into your binary system, then this is A FACT that you have to accept. Either that or change your definition.
If your definition leads to the conclusion that Intersex or sterile people don`t fit into your binary system, then this is A FACT that you have to accept. Either that or change your definition.
December 6, 2025 at 1:47 PM
How many sexes exist is DIRECTLY CONCLUDED from the given definition.
If your definition leads to the conclusion that Intersex or sterile people don`t fit into your binary system, then this is A FACT that you have to accept. Either that or change your definition.
If your definition leads to the conclusion that Intersex or sterile people don`t fit into your binary system, then this is A FACT that you have to accept. Either that or change your definition.
Dude, you can`t just say ""Intersex" and "sterile" are not sexes." and then think you`ve won the argument.
December 6, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Dude, you can`t just say ""Intersex" and "sterile" are not sexes." and then think you`ve won the argument.
Happy Birthday to you.
Here, have a Bridget.
Here, have a Bridget.
a cartoon character is doing a handstand while wearing a blue jacket
ALT: a cartoon character is doing a handstand while wearing a blue jacket
media.tenor.com
December 3, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Happy Birthday to you.
Here, have a Bridget.
Here, have a Bridget.
???
I guess you really are high.
I guess you really are high.
December 3, 2025 at 12:19 PM
???
I guess you really are high.
I guess you really are high.
You must be high if you think sex matters is a serious source for...anything.
December 3, 2025 at 12:19 PM
You must be high if you think sex matters is a serious source for...anything.
Wie? Seit wann?
December 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Wie? Seit wann?