don’t you think that Greenland has more conditions similar to Panama in 89?US forces are already on the ground, they know the ins and outs and can take action more decisively while betting on limited EU response.something else will just take too much time and US loses leverage over EU in meantime

portugal had a similar inflow of immigrants. has the GDP of portugal increased b/c of this or because the economy is indeed growing and is attracting immigration?

succeed, you come up with very”interesting” angles. i’d strongly suggest you to consider your own bias. immigration derives from need of workforce and is not the driver per se of gdp (i’d argue). at least nuance your positions when you’re following your own confirmation bias

first, disclaimer: i respect your work and your analysis. but you really have some problems with the periphery. you constantly ignore from the poor germans subsidising the rest from a debt perspective the overall benefit that core europe gets from the periphery (eg qualified workforce) & when they

subsidise buying major german, french car makers (more expensive, less efficient) at european (less rich) tax payer’s cost, while making energy transition for everyone artificially more expensive with cheaper& more efficient EVs being left out. EU cynicism at its best, for which it’d probably work

not because of its friendlier stance with China 😜 (e.g. huawei)

Check what’s going on in Portugal

Useful vote. Perception that your vote is more useful to support a potential winner than a very likely loser

Relativamente ao impacto das tarifas em Portugal, não existe um certo exagero? Turismo conta como exportações para os EUA. Mesmo admitindo que o euro valoriza, não vejo o turismo a ser particularmente impactado com esta situação (e conseq talvez PT esteja em melhor situação que outros países EU)

Trump was elected and he was convicted. No one cares anymore.