@macfromx.bsky.social
Provisionally granted, even if opposed. Will go into effect as so soon as you: (i) certify that you've met & conferred with your adversary (despair) and (ii) file a supporting memorandum of levity (which, at your option, may consist entirely of emojis).
December 22, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Provisionally granted, even if opposed. Will go into effect as so soon as you: (i) certify that you've met & conferred with your adversary (despair) and (ii) file a supporting memorandum of levity (which, at your option, may consist entirely of emojis).
TBF, it's uncertain whether Joe Biden actually prevented your air fryer from crisping up the sweet potato fries.
Does your air fryer failure raise additional serious questions regarding Joe Biden's mental acuity? Of course. Absolutely. But, that's not the same as establishing direct causation.
Does your air fryer failure raise additional serious questions regarding Joe Biden's mental acuity? Of course. Absolutely. But, that's not the same as establishing direct causation.
December 19, 2025 at 3:39 PM
TBF, it's uncertain whether Joe Biden actually prevented your air fryer from crisping up the sweet potato fries.
Does your air fryer failure raise additional serious questions regarding Joe Biden's mental acuity? Of course. Absolutely. But, that's not the same as establishing direct causation.
Does your air fryer failure raise additional serious questions regarding Joe Biden's mental acuity? Of course. Absolutely. But, that's not the same as establishing direct causation.
Nothing to see here. Construction of the White House bunker continues. Carry on.
December 18, 2025 at 6:26 AM
Nothing to see here. Construction of the White House bunker continues. Carry on.
I call dibs on the final Cinnabon
December 18, 2025 at 3:05 AM
I call dibs on the final Cinnabon
And that was under Florida's relatively anemic anti-SLAPP law.
December 18, 2025 at 3:00 AM
And that was under Florida's relatively anemic anti-SLAPP law.
I recall when Textor came to town:
"You got trouble, folks, right here in Port St. Lucie. Trouble with a capital 'T' and that rhymes with 'P' and that stands for post-production . . ."
"You got trouble, folks, right here in Port St. Lucie. Trouble with a capital 'T' and that rhymes with 'P' and that stands for post-production . . ."
December 18, 2025 at 2:54 AM
I recall when Textor came to town:
"You got trouble, folks, right here in Port St. Lucie. Trouble with a capital 'T' and that rhymes with 'P' and that stands for post-production . . ."
"You got trouble, folks, right here in Port St. Lucie. Trouble with a capital 'T' and that rhymes with 'P' and that stands for post-production . . ."
Roughly $2.50 less than a small cup of coffee at Starbucks.
December 18, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Roughly $2.50 less than a small cup of coffee at Starbucks.
There is.
Jeffrey Epstein is a fictional character whom Nancy Pelosi & Hugo Chavez co-invented to hurt Trump. Also, there's no such thing as a condom. Condoms are just a hoax fabricated by the DNC.
Jeffrey Epstein is a fictional character whom Nancy Pelosi & Hugo Chavez co-invented to hurt Trump. Also, there's no such thing as a condom. Condoms are just a hoax fabricated by the DNC.
December 16, 2025 at 12:21 AM
There is.
Jeffrey Epstein is a fictional character whom Nancy Pelosi & Hugo Chavez co-invented to hurt Trump. Also, there's no such thing as a condom. Condoms are just a hoax fabricated by the DNC.
Jeffrey Epstein is a fictional character whom Nancy Pelosi & Hugo Chavez co-invented to hurt Trump. Also, there's no such thing as a condom. Condoms are just a hoax fabricated by the DNC.
You'll be fine as long as it's wearing a "Service Candle" harness, and remains on your lap or strapped into its own fully prepaid seat directly adjacent to you throughout the flight. Do not place it under your seat or in the overhead, lest misconstrued video ends up going viral and PETC mobilizes.
December 10, 2025 at 12:16 AM
You'll be fine as long as it's wearing a "Service Candle" harness, and remains on your lap or strapped into its own fully prepaid seat directly adjacent to you throughout the flight. Do not place it under your seat or in the overhead, lest misconstrued video ends up going viral and PETC mobilizes.
6 R voters, some or all of whom are on at least some, and possibly (but not necessarily) all, US strikes on suspected boats.
Vagueness aside, it's still exemplary investigative journalism, rivaled, I think, only by NYT's Pentagon Papers exposé.
(You're welcome.)
Vagueness aside, it's still exemplary investigative journalism, rivaled, I think, only by NYT's Pentagon Papers exposé.
(You're welcome.)
December 7, 2025 at 2:21 AM
6 R voters, some or all of whom are on at least some, and possibly (but not necessarily) all, US strikes on suspected boats.
Vagueness aside, it's still exemplary investigative journalism, rivaled, I think, only by NYT's Pentagon Papers exposé.
(You're welcome.)
Vagueness aside, it's still exemplary investigative journalism, rivaled, I think, only by NYT's Pentagon Papers exposé.
(You're welcome.)
5. Whether:
(a) each US strike on each
suspected boat is bearing exactly 6 R voters, and if so, whether the 6 R voters on each such US strike on each such suspected boat consists of i) the same group of persons or ii) a unique group of persons; or instead
(b) there is unique group of
(a) each US strike on each
suspected boat is bearing exactly 6 R voters, and if so, whether the 6 R voters on each such US strike on each such suspected boat consists of i) the same group of persons or ii) a unique group of persons; or instead
(b) there is unique group of
December 7, 2025 at 2:21 AM
5. Whether:
(a) each US strike on each
suspected boat is bearing exactly 6 R voters, and if so, whether the 6 R voters on each such US strike on each such suspected boat consists of i) the same group of persons or ii) a unique group of persons; or instead
(b) there is unique group of
(a) each US strike on each
suspected boat is bearing exactly 6 R voters, and if so, whether the 6 R voters on each such US strike on each such suspected boat consists of i) the same group of persons or ii) a unique group of persons; or instead
(b) there is unique group of
Still unclear:
1. Which boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. Which, if not all, boats that are so suspected are also bearing one or more US strikes;
3. What does it mean for an R voter to be "on" a US strike;
4. Do any such R voters frequent at least one rural Ohio diner; and
1. Which boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. Which, if not all, boats that are so suspected are also bearing one or more US strikes;
3. What does it mean for an R voter to be "on" a US strike;
4. Do any such R voters frequent at least one rural Ohio diner; and
December 7, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Still unclear:
1. Which boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. Which, if not all, boats that are so suspected are also bearing one or more US strikes;
3. What does it mean for an R voter to be "on" a US strike;
4. Do any such R voters frequent at least one rural Ohio diner; and
1. Which boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. Which, if not all, boats that are so suspected are also bearing one or more US strikes;
3. What does it mean for an R voter to be "on" a US strike;
4. Do any such R voters frequent at least one rural Ohio diner; and
No. the voats are merely *suspected of smuggling drugs.
Otherwise, headline is somewhat ill-structured.
As best I can discern:
1. Certain boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. US strikes are on one or more such boats; and
3. 6 R voters are on one or more such US strikes.
Otherwise, headline is somewhat ill-structured.
As best I can discern:
1. Certain boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. US strikes are on one or more such boats; and
3. 6 R voters are on one or more such US strikes.
December 7, 2025 at 2:21 AM
No. the voats are merely *suspected of smuggling drugs.
Otherwise, headline is somewhat ill-structured.
As best I can discern:
1. Certain boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. US strikes are on one or more such boats; and
3. 6 R voters are on one or more such US strikes.
Otherwise, headline is somewhat ill-structured.
As best I can discern:
1. Certain boats are suspected of smuggling drugs;
2. US strikes are on one or more such boats; and
3. 6 R voters are on one or more such US strikes.
Displace one word and there would be diminishment. Displace one phrase and the structure would fall.
December 3, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Displace one word and there would be diminishment. Displace one phrase and the structure would fall.
A futile exercise. "Money-trench-dwelling," "market-rigging," and "child-fucking" are the top three mitigating factors on Trump's list.
December 3, 2025 at 1:23 PM
A futile exercise. "Money-trench-dwelling," "market-rigging," and "child-fucking" are the top three mitigating factors on Trump's list.
"Gilmour Girls" is very clever.
I viscerally prefer "Pinker Floyd," for some deeply-ingrained reason. But, I cannot put my finger on it now.
I viscerally prefer "Pinker Floyd," for some deeply-ingrained reason. But, I cannot put my finger on it now.
November 30, 2025 at 4:57 PM
"Gilmour Girls" is very clever.
I viscerally prefer "Pinker Floyd," for some deeply-ingrained reason. But, I cannot put my finger on it now.
I viscerally prefer "Pinker Floyd," for some deeply-ingrained reason. But, I cannot put my finger on it now.
It's like when LBJ lost Conkrite.
November 28, 2025 at 4:30 PM
It's like when LBJ lost Conkrite.
Actually, I'm a very progressive non-Republican. Yet, that doesn't stop my manifestly uninformed, ultra-left Gen Z nephew from argumentatively telling me "Do your research."
November 26, 2025 at 6:32 AM
Actually, I'm a very progressive non-Republican. Yet, that doesn't stop my manifestly uninformed, ultra-left Gen Z nephew from argumentatively telling me "Do your research."
This cat seems to be dead no matter how many times the court collapses the wave function.
November 23, 2025 at 4:40 AM
This cat seems to be dead no matter how many times the court collapses the wave function.
Here are some JFK sppech excerpts. You've probably heard most, if not all, of them. But, they're worth hearing again. They starkly, and sadly, reveal just how far we've since fallen as a nation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
November 23, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Here are some JFK sppech excerpts. You've probably heard most, if not all, of them. But, they're worth hearing again. They starkly, and sadly, reveal just how far we've since fallen as a nation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
Seriously, Trump's been a Daily Stormer darling ever since he announced candidacy from the bowels of Trump Tower. He's been a Daily Stormer icon ever since Charlottesville.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
November 21, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Seriously, Trump's been a Daily Stormer darling ever since he announced candidacy from the bowels of Trump Tower. He's been a Daily Stormer icon ever since Charlottesville.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
I rate Trump a minus 11.
November 20, 2025 at 4:14 AM
I rate Trump a minus 11.
Here are the two f$*ked up indictment instruments, appended to the post I did that day. Halligan is 36. Still young, but not young enough to have any excuses.
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
November 20, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Here are the two f$*ked up indictment instruments, appended to the post I did that day. Halligan is 36. Still young, but not young enough to have any excuses.
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
Cluster f$*k known since initial hearing. Halligan predictably catastrophic & potentially in longer-term Bar trouble. And this is independent of fact that her appointment may be invalid, which could void already defective indictment & bounce already meritless case under SOL.
bsky.app/profile/macf...
bsky.app/profile/macf...
Cluster F.
1 Which is it?
a 2-count?
b 3-count?
c Non-concur on 1 count or all?
2 Does 2-count omit "Person 2" because GJ declined to indict on count referencing "Person 2"?
3 Foreperson interlineated in non-concur memo?
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
1 Which is it?
a 2-count?
b 3-count?
c Non-concur on 1 count or all?
2 Does 2-count omit "Person 2" because GJ declined to indict on count referencing "Person 2"?
3 Foreperson interlineated in non-concur memo?
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
November 20, 2025 at 3:47 AM
Cluster f$*k known since initial hearing. Halligan predictably catastrophic & potentially in longer-term Bar trouble. And this is independent of fact that her appointment may be invalid, which could void already defective indictment & bounce already meritless case under SOL.
bsky.app/profile/macf...
bsky.app/profile/macf...