But wouldn’t it be easier to hold people to account (eg, re adequate provision for their children) if they cannot easily argue that the support is inadequate?

Should the policy therefore be to limit them to two disruptive children?

Parallel execution is famously hard, and people can only be coaxed into it unawares.

They usually have some businesses or other type of income in the UK as well, and they do pay tax on their income from those. There are also less egregiously rich people, e.g. programmers, who chose to work in the UK because of the nicer tax regime. Now they will go somewhere else.

Compared to upscale supermarkets in Germany, let alone France and Austria, they are still rather sad, though.

The times were hard, so if one used tables there was no space left for the affiliation.

First I mistakenly assumed that the paper in question is the first one on the page, but after additional analyses it transpired that that one is actually 5 paragraphs long.

I always understood ‘Judeo-’ here as referring to Jews until ~100 A.D. Otherwise why not ‘Jewish-Christian’?

But are you willing to fight for it?

www.nytimes.com/2025/02/21/o...

Fun fact: while EDI is the standard in the US and starts with equity, the UK has DEI (diversity, _equality_, and inclusion), which is of course not confusing at all.

According to this website (shorturl.at/OKMIM and other sources I saw), this is a definition of "equality", while "equity" means "going the extra step" and proactively helping them.

Zenodo?