Sadly I don't have any impressive MD homebrews prepared yet, maybe in 2028? Definitely in the year 252525.

God damnit the A and B buttons don't work

I have a bunch of 6-button pads but they make my hand cramp

atgames firecore sonic 3 and knuckles ost

I... okay.

I think a more important lesson to teach is that you shouldn't invest in a big model first and foremost, but that not having one shouldn't prevent you from starting out. That's one of the main reasons people still gravitate to agencies, that and security

lmao

Is it bad that I misread your name as

Turns out I was right to have a hunch, even a week after all that I'm learning more about this... interesting creature, being pretty much exactly what I've been fearing this whole time.
With any luck, I won't be looking into this any further. I will fade out of this and emerge in better times.

TLDR: from looking at a post on twitter I had a hunch that something was up, then later tried to find deleted information to either back it up or shut me up. As right wing grifters love to supply every little detail, and I wasn't having any luck with the internet archive, they were a good source.

that's actually pretty useful, thanks

I mean I've also heard of a "dark past" for Ana, but I have a feeling that's just... more giantess fart asmr, or whatever the hell internet archive was implying.

My main gripe in all of this is that I had to actively engage with right-wing grifter content again, just to understand what was being hidden. It really is a shame we don't see eye to eye, I'm quite fond of how blunt some of them are, but having to go through them for this left my body feeling sick

I don't care about the incident itself, as long as actual kids weren't harmed or involved I couldn't give two shits, my issue was the deflection by Ana and clear disregard from the respondent; maybe I should've clarified that I was only seeking answers...

The person also responded to that, disregarding the whole "wearing a vibrator tied to actions in an online kids game while actively acknowledging consent and approving a blame deflection for being trans, citing a nobody cis girl as evidence" ...thing

Did the other persons response and my clarification get deleted?
TLDR for my response, I found where the groomer allegations came through and shut down the breaking rule 3 claim; it was regarding the Kirsche hit piece. Though that does fall under rule 7, it's evident why they butted heads

(Also, I falsely assumed Ana blocked me when it was actually the person I was warning, which is why I quoted that message specifically. Gonna chalk that up to bad UI, a shame considering the rest of this site is pretty good at UI stuff)

If you've only seen my quote that's a fair interpretation, but in the actual post I don't think this makes sense.
"People, given the negative response elsewhere I'd suggest doing research first and deciding from there. Ana, if you delete this then that means I'll have to as well."