Agreed, the money should be followed, as it may show how the information was obtained through paid transactions. However, I’m not a lawyer; I’m just voicing an opinion about a potential reason for biased reporting. Gone are the days of balanced journalism and integrity, now it’s click-bait headlines

There is no verified evidence that the Mail is paying for his apartment, medical treatment, surgeries, or immigration costs, but it does question how these are being covered. Harry’s legal team could investigate through legal discovery if relevant. It is sad how money played such a major part here.😔

Because of her close access to Thomas Markle, many public narratives involving him, particularly those critical of Meghan, are filtered through her, giving her significant influence over how his story is presented and gives a perception of bias of the Mail’s coverage.