Ah okay, that actually makes sense.

Hmm, weird classification. It does it make sense for you?

That is very accurate

It's not just the women and girls we know of. It's all their future work, and everything they could have been, and how we build structures that shelter their abusers. It's how a man's future has always been worth more than my past, present, and future combined.

I mean, we all know why.

It's still a part of every conversation and every discussion of systemic sexism. But this keeps happening, in every industry, in every setting, and we keep siding with the men. "Oh she was too pretty, she was a temptation." "Oh she made him do it." "Oh she was at fault."

"We would have lost so much if we'd driven him away" is the justification.

But we lost all those girls. We lost the women they would have become. We lost the work they would have done. Why was his future work so much more valuable than theirs?

Eine Beurteilung, dass jemand “seinem Amt gewachsen ist” von jemandem, der seinem Amt selbst nicht gewachsen ist, kann ich nicht ernst nehmen.

I forgot it's out, tks