margms.bsky.social
@margms.bsky.social
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
The American state media attacked President Biden more fiercely over his age whilst he was doing good work than they have with orange felon murdering citizens, arresting journalists, terrorizing immigrants and robbing the country blind. They deliberately failed humanity.
January 30, 2026 at 7:56 PM
The American state media attacked President Biden more fiercely over his age whilst he was doing good work than they have with orange felon murdering citizens, arresting journalists, terrorizing immigrants and robbing the country blind. They deliberately failed humanity.
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the retired Army officer who played a central role in President Trump’s first impeachment, is launching a campaign to represent Florida in the U.S. Senate as a Democrat.
Impeachment witness Alex Vindman runs for U.S. Senate in Florida
The retired Army officer who testified during Trump’s first impeachment is jumping into electoral politics as a Democrat in a state Republicans have recently dominated.
www.washingtonpost.com
January 27, 2026 at 4:30 PM
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the retired Army officer who played a central role in President Trump’s first impeachment, is launching a campaign to represent Florida in the U.S. Senate as a Democrat.
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
WSJ says ICE is lying.
Read that again…. The Wall Street Journal is calling out the lies
Read that again…. The Wall Street Journal is calling out the lies
January 25, 2026 at 3:03 PM
WSJ says ICE is lying.
Read that again…. The Wall Street Journal is calling out the lies
Read that again…. The Wall Street Journal is calling out the lies
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
Congress is not powerless. Democrats must unify around an actual agenda.
1. Vote no on DHS funding bill.
2. Repeal the multi-year $75 billion funding for ICE.
3. End qualified immunity for ICE agents.
4. Investigate and prosecute every single ICE agent who broke the law.
1. Vote no on DHS funding bill.
2. Repeal the multi-year $75 billion funding for ICE.
3. End qualified immunity for ICE agents.
4. Investigate and prosecute every single ICE agent who broke the law.
January 25, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Congress is not powerless. Democrats must unify around an actual agenda.
1. Vote no on DHS funding bill.
2. Repeal the multi-year $75 billion funding for ICE.
3. End qualified immunity for ICE agents.
4. Investigate and prosecute every single ICE agent who broke the law.
1. Vote no on DHS funding bill.
2. Repeal the multi-year $75 billion funding for ICE.
3. End qualified immunity for ICE agents.
4. Investigate and prosecute every single ICE agent who broke the law.
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
Too obvious a point even to make, perhaps. But there was no “unrest” in Minneapolis before ICE and CBP showed up. ICE and CBP are the cause of the chaos…and the killings.
Get them out of there.
Get them out of there.
January 24, 2026 at 6:55 PM
Too obvious a point even to make, perhaps. But there was no “unrest” in Minneapolis before ICE and CBP showed up. ICE and CBP are the cause of the chaos…and the killings.
Get them out of there.
Get them out of there.
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
REPORTER: “How far are you willing to go to acquire Greenland?”
TRUMP: “You’ll find out.”
TRUMP: “You’ll find out.”
January 20, 2026 at 8:17 PM
REPORTER: “How far are you willing to go to acquire Greenland?”
TRUMP: “You’ll find out.”
TRUMP: “You’ll find out.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
REPORTER: How does winning a Nobel Peace Prize improve the lives of everyday Americans?
TRUMP: “It wouldn’t improve the lives of any— but would improve the lives of people.”
TRUMP: “It wouldn’t improve the lives of any— but would improve the lives of people.”
January 20, 2026 at 8:32 PM
REPORTER: How does winning a Nobel Peace Prize improve the lives of everyday Americans?
TRUMP: “It wouldn’t improve the lives of any— but would improve the lives of people.”
TRUMP: “It wouldn’t improve the lives of any— but would improve the lives of people.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
Trump at World Economic Forum: “In 12 months we have removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from the federal payrolls. The largest single-year reduction in government employment since the end of World War II. Nobody thought that was coming, but we had no choice.”
January 21, 2026 at 5:09 PM
Trump at World Economic Forum: “In 12 months we have removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from the federal payrolls. The largest single-year reduction in government employment since the end of World War II. Nobody thought that was coming, but we had no choice.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
“There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place. And they are losers. One thing I’ve noticed, is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses—and the worse that country’s doing.” —Trump at the World Economic Forum
January 21, 2026 at 5:26 PM
“There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place. And they are losers. One thing I’ve noticed, is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses—and the worse that country’s doing.” —Trump at the World Economic Forum
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
“China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? That’s a good way of looking at it. They’re smart, China is very smart... They sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them.” —Trump
January 21, 2026 at 5:30 PM
“China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? That’s a good way of looking at it. They’re smart, China is very smart... They sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them.” —Trump
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
“I can’t believe it, we got good reviews on that speech. Usually they say, ‘He’s a horrible dictator type person.’ I’m a dictator. But sometimes you need a dictator.” —Trump after speaking at the World Economic Forum
January 21, 2026 at 6:10 PM
“I can’t believe it, we got good reviews on that speech. Usually they say, ‘He’s a horrible dictator type person.’ I’m a dictator. But sometimes you need a dictator.” —Trump after speaking at the World Economic Forum
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith testifies to Congress: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”
January 22, 2026 at 3:38 PM
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith testifies to Congress: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
RASKIN: “Is there a valid Fist Amendment defense to violating the voting rights of the people and cheating the public out of a fair election?”
SMITH: “The First Amendment is something we took seriously in our investigation, but the First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime.”
SMITH: “The First Amendment is something we took seriously in our investigation, but the First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime.”
January 22, 2026 at 3:56 PM
RASKIN: “Is there a valid Fist Amendment defense to violating the voting rights of the people and cheating the public out of a fair election?”
SMITH: “The First Amendment is something we took seriously in our investigation, but the First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime.”
SMITH: “The First Amendment is something we took seriously in our investigation, but the First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
LOFGREN: In terms grand jury testimony that’s been released Trump, according to Sen Graham, would believe martians stole the election, what does that say about his state of mind?
SMITH: “That statement is consistent in what we found in our investigation...Trump was not looking for honest answers”
SMITH: “That statement is consistent in what we found in our investigation...Trump was not looking for honest answers”
January 22, 2026 at 5:03 PM
LOFGREN: In terms grand jury testimony that’s been released Trump, according to Sen Graham, would believe martians stole the election, what does that say about his state of mind?
SMITH: “That statement is consistent in what we found in our investigation...Trump was not looking for honest answers”
SMITH: “That statement is consistent in what we found in our investigation...Trump was not looking for honest answers”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
LOFGREN: Who are some of the Republican witnesses who told President Trump that his claims of election fraud were false?
SMITH: “They ranged from people on his campaign team who had wanted him to win...state Republican officials who wanted him to win...people he worked with in the White House”
SMITH: “They ranged from people on his campaign team who had wanted him to win...state Republican officials who wanted him to win...people he worked with in the White House”
January 22, 2026 at 5:10 PM
LOFGREN: Who are some of the Republican witnesses who told President Trump that his claims of election fraud were false?
SMITH: “They ranged from people on his campaign team who had wanted him to win...state Republican officials who wanted him to win...people he worked with in the White House”
SMITH: “They ranged from people on his campaign team who had wanted him to win...state Republican officials who wanted him to win...people he worked with in the White House”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
HANK JOHNSON: The indictments have been dismissed, can they be resurrected after Trump leaves office?
SMITH: “They were dismissed without prejudice”
JOHNSON: “So they can be refiled? And he can be re-prosecuted after he leaves office, is that correct?”
SMITH: “I’m not going to speak to that.”
SMITH: “They were dismissed without prejudice”
JOHNSON: “So they can be refiled? And he can be re-prosecuted after he leaves office, is that correct?”
SMITH: “I’m not going to speak to that.”
January 22, 2026 at 5:22 PM
HANK JOHNSON: The indictments have been dismissed, can they be resurrected after Trump leaves office?
SMITH: “They were dismissed without prejudice”
JOHNSON: “So they can be refiled? And he can be re-prosecuted after he leaves office, is that correct?”
SMITH: “I’m not going to speak to that.”
SMITH: “They were dismissed without prejudice”
JOHNSON: “So they can be refiled? And he can be re-prosecuted after he leaves office, is that correct?”
SMITH: “I’m not going to speak to that.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
“Our investigation revealed that Donald Trump was the person who cause January 6th, that it was foreseeable to him, and that he sought to exploit the violence.” —Jack Smith when asked about allegations the FBI was involved in the violence on January 6, 2021
January 22, 2026 at 5:17 PM
“Our investigation revealed that Donald Trump was the person who cause January 6th, that it was foreseeable to him, and that he sought to exploit the violence.” —Jack Smith when asked about allegations the FBI was involved in the violence on January 6, 2021
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
JAYAPAL: “How would you describe the toll on our democracy if we do not hold a president accountable for attempting to steal an election?”
SMITH: “My belief is that if we do not hold the most powerful people in our society to the same standards of the rule of law, it can be catastrophic.”
SMITH: “My belief is that if we do not hold the most powerful people in our society to the same standards of the rule of law, it can be catastrophic.”
January 22, 2026 at 5:53 PM
JAYAPAL: “How would you describe the toll on our democracy if we do not hold a president accountable for attempting to steal an election?”
SMITH: “My belief is that if we do not hold the most powerful people in our society to the same standards of the rule of law, it can be catastrophic.”
SMITH: “My belief is that if we do not hold the most powerful people in our society to the same standards of the rule of law, it can be catastrophic.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
JAYAPAL: “What do you think the toll is for future elections? And future presidents who try to steal an election?”
SMITH: “I think if we don’t hold people to account when they commit crimes, it sends a message that those crimes are okay. That our society accepts that.”
SMITH: “I think if we don’t hold people to account when they commit crimes, it sends a message that those crimes are okay. That our society accepts that.”
January 22, 2026 at 5:57 PM
JAYAPAL: “What do you think the toll is for future elections? And future presidents who try to steal an election?”
SMITH: “I think if we don’t hold people to account when they commit crimes, it sends a message that those crimes are okay. That our society accepts that.”
SMITH: “I think if we don’t hold people to account when they commit crimes, it sends a message that those crimes are okay. That our society accepts that.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
TROY NEHLS (R–TX): “The fault [for January 6] does not lie with Donald Trump. It lies with Yogananda Pittman and the U.S. Capitol leadership team. We know, we know, they had the intelligence—”
MICHAEL FANONE: *coughs* “Go fuck yourself.” *cough*
MICHAEL FANONE: *coughs* “Go fuck yourself.” *cough*
January 22, 2026 at 7:42 PM
TROY NEHLS (R–TX): “The fault [for January 6] does not lie with Donald Trump. It lies with Yogananda Pittman and the U.S. Capitol leadership team. We know, we know, they had the intelligence—”
MICHAEL FANONE: *coughs* “Go fuck yourself.” *cough*
MICHAEL FANONE: *coughs* “Go fuck yourself.” *cough*
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
REPORTER: Are you proud of how the administration is conducting this immigration crackdown?
VANCE: “Well, I’m proud of the fact we’re standing behind law enforcement, and I’m proud of the fact that we are enforcing the country’s laws.”
VANCE: “Well, I’m proud of the fact we’re standing behind law enforcement, and I’m proud of the fact that we are enforcing the country’s laws.”
January 22, 2026 at 8:01 PM
REPORTER: Are you proud of how the administration is conducting this immigration crackdown?
VANCE: “Well, I’m proud of the fact we’re standing behind law enforcement, and I’m proud of the fact that we are enforcing the country’s laws.”
VANCE: “Well, I’m proud of the fact we’re standing behind law enforcement, and I’m proud of the fact that we are enforcing the country’s laws.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
“I didn’t say, and I don’t think anybody within the Trump administration said, that officers who engaged in wrong doing would enjoy immunity. That’s absurd.” —Vance on the administration suggesting ICE officers have near complete immunity in the wake of the Renee Good killing
January 22, 2026 at 8:07 PM
“I didn’t say, and I don’t think anybody within the Trump administration said, that officers who engaged in wrong doing would enjoy immunity. That’s absurd.” —Vance on the administration suggesting ICE officers have near complete immunity in the wake of the Renee Good killing
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
REPORTER: Local police are saying their own officers are being racially profiled and asked to show papers. Is that a concern of the administration?
VANCE: “I saw one story about this...and look, certainly, is it a concern? Absolutely. The first thing we have to figure out is if it happened or not.”
VANCE: “I saw one story about this...and look, certainly, is it a concern? Absolutely. The first thing we have to figure out is if it happened or not.”
January 22, 2026 at 8:26 PM
REPORTER: Local police are saying their own officers are being racially profiled and asked to show papers. Is that a concern of the administration?
VANCE: “I saw one story about this...and look, certainly, is it a concern? Absolutely. The first thing we have to figure out is if it happened or not.”
VANCE: “I saw one story about this...and look, certainly, is it a concern? Absolutely. The first thing we have to figure out is if it happened or not.”
Reposted by margms.bsky.social
REPORTER: Is there anything you saw today that would cause you to advise Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act?
VANCE: “Right now, we don’t think that we need that. Now, the president could change his mind, of course”
VANCE: “Right now, we don’t think that we need that. Now, the president could change his mind, of course”
January 22, 2026 at 8:20 PM
REPORTER: Is there anything you saw today that would cause you to advise Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act?
VANCE: “Right now, we don’t think that we need that. Now, the president could change his mind, of course”
VANCE: “Right now, we don’t think that we need that. Now, the president could change his mind, of course”