Margy O’Herron
@margyoh.bsky.social
120 followers 58 following 35 posts
Immigration Law and Policy Expert | Senior Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU | Migration and Human Rights Fellow, Cornell Law School | Former Biden Administration Domestic Policy Council | Former Department of Justice
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
margyoh.bsky.social
The great majority of immigrants getting locked up have no criminal background, and many are in lawful status -- nowhere near the "worst of the worst." U.S. citizens are being swept up too. It's unAmerican and it wastes taxpayer money.
margyoh.bsky.social
Using military lawyers in civil immigration proceedings further blurs the line between military personnel and civilian government. It’s another step in the wrong direction. 14/14
margyoh.bsky.social
Even if lawful, this action is part of President Trump's pattern of misusing the military & eroding barriers between military personnel & civilian govt (eg, using military aircraft for deportations flights, deploying National Guard & active-duty troops to assist w/ immigration enforcement). 13/14
margyoh.bsky.social
In 1983, Congress enacted a law authorizing JAGs to be detailed to DOJ to exercise the functions of a federal civil office. bsky.app/profile/stev... 12/14
bsky.app
margyoh.bsky.social
Using JAG lawyers as immigration judges this way is a terrible idea. Even so it probably doesn’t violate the Posse Comitatus Act, which bars the federal armed forces from participating in law enforcement except when expressly authorized by Congress. 11/14
margyoh.bsky.social
In addition, assigning JAG lawyers to work as immigration judges will pull them away from the important work they’re trained to do, including prosecuting and defending military personnel in court martial cases and advising military leaders on vital matters such as national security law. 10/14
margyoh.bsky.social
Wrong decisions in immigrant court can have devastating consequences, like deporting someone to a country where they will be persecuted or separating family members, in some cases for the rest of their lives. 9/14
margyoh.bsky.social
A fair trial in a fair tribunal cannot possibly mean a hearing before a government employee with little to no knowledge of immigration law or procedures who is handpicked by the Secretary of Defense at the request of the Attorney General. 8/14
margyoh.bsky.social
DOJ says temporary immigration judges will get the same six-week training as permanent immigration judges, but NPR reports their training will be limited to two weeks. That is not enough. 7/14
margyoh.bsky.social
Immigration judges must know the immigration law, which the Supreme Court has called “complex” and a “legal specialty of its own.” It takes months or years to learn. 6/14
margyoh.bsky.social
Firing experienced specialist judges to replace them with inexperienced ones suggests that DOJ is trying to build a bench of judges who will support Trump's agenda. 5/14
margyoh.bsky.social
DOJ has fired as many as 65 immigration judges since the beginning of the year, all career government employees. 4/14
margyoh.bsky.social
On August 28, DOJ issued a rule allowing “any attorney” to be selected as a temporary immigration judge, eliminating the previous requirement that temporary judges have years of adjudicatory, litigation, or immigration experience. 3/14 www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...
margyoh.bsky.social
Immigration judges are specially trained administrative judges in the Department of Justice that oversee deportation hearings. 2/14 www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
margyoh.bsky.social
The Trump administration’s plan to use 600 military lawyers as temporary immigration judges, with some starting as soon as this week, will deprive immigrants of a fair hearing and further erode the line between military personnel and civilian government. 1/14
Reposted by Margy O’Herron
brennancenter.org
The Voting Rights Act, the crowning achievement of the civil rights movement, is under attack. Join us on Tuesday, August 19, at 3 p.m. ET for a free virtual event with experts to explore its legacy and its future. RSVP: bit.ly/46MuApV
The Past, Present, and Future of the Voting Rights Act
Experts discuss what remains of the landmark 1965 law after decades of attacks.
www.brennancenter.org
margyoh.bsky.social
Who gets banned this time? Muslims, Africans, Haitians, and Venezuelans, all people the president has stigmatized. Doug Rand and I explain why the government's own data doesn't support its claims. The picture tells the story.
Reposted by Margy O’Herron
brennancenter.org
BREAKING: Eight former New York judges, including the former Chief Judge and Chief Administrative Judge, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in United States v. New York. Allowing ICE to make warrantless civil arrests at courthouses undermines the proper functioning of state courts.
United States v. State of New York
The Brennan Center, along with co-counsel Levine Lee, filed an amicus brief on behalf of former New York judges and justices in defense of New York’s Protect Our Courts Act. The brief argues that allo...
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted by Margy O’Herron
josephanunn.bsky.social
Congress can fix these problems and stop future executives from overstepping by giving residents of DC the kind of true self-governance that all other Americans enjoy. They can start by granting control over the DC National Guard to the mayor. slate.com/news-and-pol...
D.C.’s National Guard Should Be Controlled by Its Mayor, Not by a President Like Trump
The National Guard didn’t turn up in time on Jan. 6, but Congress may be about to fix that.
slate.com
margyoh.bsky.social
The president’s take over of DC local policing is an improper use of emergency powers. Check out @josephanunn.bsky.social’s explanation.
josephanunn.bsky.social
THREAD: This morning, President Trump and members of his cabinet announced a set of sweeping, unprecedented, and unwarranted actions to impose federal control over local policing in Washington, D.C.
margyoh.bsky.social
CBP is supercharging border surveillance and, as @sreynolds.bsky.social points out, there is significant risk that those efforts will bleed into the rest of the country.
sreynolds.bsky.social
Essential reading on border surveillance tech, its human impact, and the risk it will move inward.

As part of this apparatus, a U.S. Intelligence Community element helps CBP analyze the phones and laptops it seizes at the border. I spoke with the author about the activity's lax rules and risks.
prospect.org
Drones, spy blimps, and motion-triggered cameras—the border is now a testing ground for dystopian surveillance. From James Baratta, the high-tech machine behind the border industrial complex:
trib.al/xNL3uaj
margyoh.bsky.social
@amostoh.bsky.social explains what the new AI EO is really about:
“These restrictions feign a commitment to truth and impartiality while expecting tech companies to fall in line with the administration’s version of reality.”
amostoh.bsky.social
A more comprehensive analysis for @brennancenter.org of how the Trump administration's latest AI policy could leave us more divided and less informed: www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ana...
Reposted by Margy O’Herron
brennancenter.org
Reviewing individuals’ social media to conduct ideological vetting has been a defining initiative of President Trump’s second term. Here’s an overview of this collection process and how the information is used.
www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
The Government’s Growing Trove of Social Media Data
It’s increasingly collecting and using social media information to make high-stakes decisions related to immigration.
www.brennancenter.org