Mariel Goddu
@marielgoddu.bsky.social
850 followers 1.4K following 310 posts
Philosophy of learning, evolution, & development, but make it metaphysics. It‘s not a point of view, it’s a point of *do*. Cognition is like digestion. Plant I > AI. Phil of Mind = Phil of Biology. https://philosophy.stanford.edu/people/mariel-goddu
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Fall Term 2025 (Sept 22-Dec 12)
-Teaching Assistant, Mathematical Logic
-Epistemology
-Proseminar
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Summer Term 2025 (June 16-Sept 22):
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
-Chapter: "Toward a 5E (evolutionary) cognition"
-Essay: "How to assemble a consciousness"
-German: C1.1/C1.2
June 🇺🇸 |July 🇩🇪 | August 🇺🇸
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Spring Term 2025 (March 31-June 11):
-Modal Logic
-Merleau-Ponty
-Soc. & Pol. Philosophy of Language
-Teaching Methods in Philosophy
-Writing (ongoing): "Intuitive Physics is for Action"; "Cognitive Ontology through the Lens of Biology"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
First day of 23rd grade 🚌
(2nd yr of 2nd PhD)

Annual reminder: It’s never too late to do what makes you happy!
Reposted by Mariel Goddu
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Check out our chapter (led by @beakr.bsky.social) on cognitive ontology here! : philpapers.org/archive/KRIC...

We propose a developmental approach to 'cognitive homologies' –– (cognitive capacities that are "the same across species") –– as a means for carving up cognition.

Our approach adopts...
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Fall Term 2025 (Sept 22-Dec 12)
-Teaching Assistant, Mathematical Logic
-Epistemology
-Proseminar
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Summer Term 2025 (June 16-Sept 22):
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
-Chapter: "Toward a 5E (evolutionary) cognition"
-Essay: "How to assemble a consciousness"
-German: C1.1/C1.2
June 🇺🇸 |July 🇩🇪 | August 🇺🇸
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Spring Term 2025 (March 31-June 11):
-Modal Logic
-Merleau-Ponty
-Soc. & Pol. Philosophy of Language
-Teaching Methods in Philosophy
-Writing (ongoing): "Intuitive Physics is for Action"; "Cognitive Ontology through the Lens of Biology"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
the approach because it offers a novel route to identifying/categorizing cognitive capacities in a way that's more in line with evolutionary biology & relies less on anthropocentric categories grounded in human introspection.

Here's to connecting cognitive science with the life sciences!

8/8
marielgoddu.bsky.social
which we are starting to address in a sequel chapter (stay tuned!)

This (current) chapter provides a few proof-of-concept examples, such as the (arguably) homologous development of episodic memory in various infant mammals.

While there's still a lot to be worked out, we're excited about

7/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
cognitive character identity mechanisms are different from ChIMs for morphological traits: much of cognitive development occurs *postnatally*.

This means that cognitive ChIMs frequently involve the organism's own goal-directed behavior!

This raises a lot of interesting puzzles, some of

6/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Our account of 'cognitive homologies' adopts this developmental approach to *COGNITIVE* traits.

We argue that cognitive capacities can be individuated (and thus identified across species) in terms of the developmental mechanisms that give rise to them: *cognitive* ChIMs!

But crucially,

5/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
are highly complex and causally non-redundant, they're extremely important for typical trait development –– & thus are conserved through evolution.

(Mess up a ChIM, and you mess up a whole trait: a body part might fail to grow, for example –– or grow in the wrong place!)

4/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
distinctive causal profile: they have a "bowtie" 🎀 causal structure, wherein variable inputs are processed through a single node to produce a variety of outputs.

(A nice analysis of 🎀s from @laurennross.bsky.social here:
core.ac.uk/download/pdf...)

Since ChIMS (Character Identity Mechanisms)

3/
core.ac.uk
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Check out our chapter (led by @beakr.bsky.social) on cognitive ontology here! : philpapers.org/archive/KRIC...

We propose a developmental approach to 'cognitive homologies' –– (cognitive capacities that are "the same across species") –– as a means for carving up cognition.

Our approach adopts...
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Oh boy! The plot thickens. (But that video though...)

I only need it as a proof-of-concept kind of example to gesture at ways people tend to characterize various non-human behaviors as "mechanical," "instinctual" or "autopilot", but I'll include your link as a "cf" in the footnote–– thanks!
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Update: it's the Great Golden Digger Wasp, the repetitive behavior is females' burrow inspection behavior, and the thing that prompts it is moving her prey

(h/t @evanwestra.bsky.social for that info & this video)

www.youtube.com/watch?si=gUN...
marielgoddu.bsky.social
HERO! Thank you!!
Also, this video is fantastic & 100% going in a footnote
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Does anyone know that famous spider[?] cognitive scientists always give as an example of "dumb" behavior––
something like, it makes a burrow, but then if you move a blade of grass in front of the hole it freaks out and rehearses the entire burrow-building routine again?

What creature is this!
marielgoddu.bsky.social
don’t develop a dogged focus on the implications of change on the mundane rhythms of everyday life —

the future will continue to feel distant, intangible and somehow ‘other,’ and this weakness may grow into a critical failure of our generation.”
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Nice thought piece re: visions of the human future (🎁 article)

www.nytimes.com/2025/08/16/o...

“If we don’t start thinking about the future as an extension of the present — and if we
Opinion | The Future Will Be Mundane
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Mariel Goddu
steveesser.bsky.social
This is a fresh (to me) and apt perspective on this topic. Great work!
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Now out in @aimagazine.bsky.social -

Against "AI Welfare": Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI
philpapers.org/archive/DORA...
led by @johndorsch.bsky.social !

We propose a novel guideline, the “Precarity Guideline,” to sidestep protracted debates about AI consciousness. We

1/11
Left: an endangered biosystem (the Amazon rainforest), a child holding up a cardboard sign that says "I'm hungry", and 10 endangered species;
Center: a "greater than" sign;
Right: the supercomputer used to power ChatGPT
marielgoddu.bsky.social
3 weeks, 3000 miles
(*now accepting recs along this route!)
marielgoddu.bsky.social
general uncertainty — i.e., with respect to that exact lack of consensus.

PS Thanks so much for engaging here and with the piece !
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Again, my personal views are very much aligned with yours. But: I think there is much less theoretical consensus re: the “boundaries of sentience” than you assume!

So: general point agreed, re: not adopting inflated language - but I do think it’s right in this case to say that there IS profound,
marielgoddu.bsky.social
We are counting on you to make the right choice –– for ourselves, now, but also for our children and generations to come.

Yours sincerely,
Mariel Goddu

/10
Regulations.gov
www.regulations.gov
marielgoddu.bsky.social
You, our esteemed public servants, must recognize the scientific evidence that the health of the environment and the health and wellbeing of American citizens are linked in this way.

You *must* favor the health and wellbeing of citizens over profits for corporations emitting toxic gases.
9/