One of six of six wins across Surrey's former 'blue wall'. Thanks to all my team, near and far.

I hope this (esp par 2) applies to upholding equality law. Some LDs have been a bit wobbly on that recently.

I hope the House of Commons will vote on the new EHRC Code and approve it.

The words of the minister (Vera Baird) cited above are not law and never have been.

Why would our Parliament ever agree to amend equality law in favour of men and to the detriment of women? Plays like this one will help make Nigel Farage the next prime minister. Trump beat Harris, remember?

The presence of public toilets other than in a workplace was an error of fact e.g. Moreover the Equality Act covers 68 million people (everyone in the UK). The GRA only covers fewer than 10,000 people (those issued with a sex-change certificate).

Errors in law. Par 9(3).

Article 9, GRA 2004: "for all purposes" *except where stated otherwise*. Multiple other examples of ignorance of the law.

It contains a tonne of errors, though. When in a hole, stop digging?

Correction: 'For all purposes, except where stated otherwise'. (Article 9, GRA 2004.) This was also set out in the SC decision. But, hey, never let the facts get in the way of a good rant?