Apparently he didn't want to re-up, so rather than keep him and lose him for nothing, they trade him and get something of value for his services.
Cleveland might be thinking they can keep him long term, or benefit from his contract coming off their books if he leaves.

Nope. I told the truth. I know some of y'all can't be handle it, but I'm gonna speak it anyway.

Is that katee sackhoff?

When the right wing terrorists take over the government, this is what happens.
They won't investigate themselves, after all.

The Don't Tread on Me guys are totally cool with the government not treading on everyone else, just as long as it's not them.
They're totally cool with tyranny, as long as it's tyranny against the others.

Weak ass mind. Weak ass spirit.
Stfu.

They don't give pullitzers for tweets, but they should, and that one should be a top nominee.

fuck off with that.
i pointed out specific strategic failures that cost them.
having a vagina is not enough to be elected President.
Dont sit there and tell me that a black man named Barack Obama has more social capital than a white former first lady.

you're trying to get me to indict the administration when i am trying to highlight the good things he did to win, which he did.
I'm not an Obama stan and he was far from ideal.
But the 1 thing he did is prove a populist can get elected.

either address my point or stop talking to me.

wtf are you even talking about?
either address the points I am making or dont bother. you're insane.

-- he didn't make any blunders like not campaigning in Wisconsin, or campaigning with the Cheneys, or promising continued support for a genocide.
You get the idea.

I wasn't praising his administration. There were a lot of betrayals, foreign and domestic. But I am talking about the 2008 campaign. Not only did he craft a good message around a populist set of policies, he also made the right moves strategically to get past any racial biases and still win.--

See how you focused on Obama to avoid talking about the popularity of Bernie, AOC, and Mamdani.
Either you are a dishonest debater, or you just can't read.

nd just to reiterate, I mentioned Bernie, AOC, Mamdani, and how the Democratic leadership has moved to squash him when he has momentum, and you never addressed it.
Who/what are you going to blame next?
FDR? Jesus? The weather?

"Rashida Tlaib is silent"? Get the fuck out of here.
You only get your info from CNN, so you dont see here, but trust, she is out here just like she has always been.
You're grasping at straws to blame everyone but your favorite idols.

What's incredibly privileged is for you to ignore policy failures in favor of empty ass identity politics. You don't acknowledge corruption. You don't acknowledge the donor class. You only care about the color your idol comes in, and not what they do once in power.

The Obama of 2008 would not only have won, he would have kicked Trump's ass. How do I know this? Look at the only people in the party with any sort of momentum. Bernie, AOC, Mamdani.
And why? Because their platform is based on policies most Americans want.

1. I love how you didn't address my point about how she was up before she pivoted hard right.
2. I'm privileged because I want the candidates to be better so they can win?