Stick to defending nuts who think BLS stats are fake

Damn then you shouldn’t have used quotation marks to imply that I made experience a point when it was you that brought it up in the first place.

I at least have enough sense to not make shit up and listen to actual experts in economics rather than listen to dogshit posters online who don’t know what they’re talking about. You think you’re expert enough to clap about other people having no experience? You should at least stop being wrong.

Genetics and animal models of neurodegenerative disease. But thanks for asking.

You have nothing to back up your claims so you go into tin foil dipshittery.

You don’t even understand what peer review is for. If the BLS data is consistently useful for third parties because it comports with their own business models and market data over a long period of time that’s very reliable.

The government’s data has been good enough for firms, markets, and other countries’ governments to gauge broader economic trends for decades. Just admit you can’t back your claims up.

Anyone who dismisses hard data from large representative samples in favor of “lived experiences” that represent more edge cases should just cede the argument already. You don’t have enough facts to back your claim up so you go into hand-wavy assertions.