At least now students know they can pass that really hard math class they signed up for by just talking about how their religion makes them feel.

He carried a weak supporting cast to the 2001 NBA Finals,where he averaged nearly 36 pts/game. Pretty good!

Absolutely came to the comments to make a "Lucy with the football" reference. I've seen this too many times to believe that there is an actual red line that he can possibly cross that will make him bleed GOP support. I'll believe it when I see it.

The question, of course, is what happens when we have presidential year (or even midterm year) levels of voter turnout. It’s possible that the claim of an exaggeration is itself an exaggeration. (Tuesday was encouraging, though.)

Suprised he wasn't wearing a "Trump 2028" hat when he said this.

I find other writing quirks more annoying, e.g., lack of oxford comma, passive voice, overuse of adverbs, etc.

Big if true.

I do not think that it is a stretch to suggest that the Roberts Court as currently constructed would have any problem at all with facially neutral Jim Crow laws. (That's, in part, what makes this such a good/important question.)

These people will be shocked to learn that: (a) most professors don’t divide their conceptual world into “conservatives” and “liberals,” and (b) most departments don’t have the money to invite any speakers to campus, whether to fulfill an intellectual vanity project or otherwise.