Mattijs
@mattijs.bsky.social
Father, musician, ultimate centrist and swing voter.
Okay, I concede… this is actually a funny post…. Well done sir…
September 18, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Okay, I concede… this is actually a funny post…. Well done sir…
I don’t think Kimmel should have been fired, but you really should also read Kirk’s remarks in context. Don’t lie please.
September 18, 2025 at 4:23 PM
I don’t think Kimmel should have been fired, but you really should also read Kirk’s remarks in context. Don’t lie please.
You know, I don’t mind you talking shit about Kirk, heck… I disagreed on many issues with him myself. I mind you being uniformed.
September 16, 2025 at 2:47 PM
You know, I don’t mind you talking shit about Kirk, heck… I disagreed on many issues with him myself. I mind you being uniformed.
Aah… here is the next ad hominem attack. How do you think I knew this was coming. You know, I’ve decided that I don’t believe you have been a lawyer. Because otherwise you would have had arguments.
September 16, 2025 at 5:50 AM
Aah… here is the next ad hominem attack. How do you think I knew this was coming. You know, I’ve decided that I don’t believe you have been a lawyer. Because otherwise you would have had arguments.
For someone who is a retired lawyer, you have a rather poor way arguing your point… you still haven’t layed out a decent argument why the skincolor of the shooter debunks anything?
September 15, 2025 at 10:29 PM
For someone who is a retired lawyer, you have a rather poor way arguing your point… you still haven’t layed out a decent argument why the skincolor of the shooter debunks anything?
… only react with ad hominem like replies where you question either my intentions or my knowledge of the English language. If you really think that your arguments are fantastic, it shouldn’t be hard to answer the question.
September 15, 2025 at 10:26 PM
… only react with ad hominem like replies where you question either my intentions or my knowledge of the English language. If you really think that your arguments are fantastic, it shouldn’t be hard to answer the question.
To debunk means to expose something as false or less true. And so my question still stands. Why does the skincolor of the shooter debunks more general statements of Kirk. And let me ask something else: why can I ask this question multiple times, without you answering the actual question and…
September 15, 2025 at 10:22 PM
To debunk means to expose something as false or less true. And so my question still stands. Why does the skincolor of the shooter debunks more general statements of Kirk. And let me ask something else: why can I ask this question multiple times, without you answering the actual question and…
Alright, then let me simply ask you, do you condemn the murders of Kirk, Hortman, and any other violence based on the fact that people have a different opinion? Unequivocally, without anything like “they had it coming” or whatever?
September 15, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Alright, then let me simply ask you, do you condemn the murders of Kirk, Hortman, and any other violence based on the fact that people have a different opinion? Unequivocally, without anything like “they had it coming” or whatever?
You literally said: white shooter debunked that bigoted logic. Literally… and you also named anti-left in your post as argument for him being a xenofobe. Then it’s hard to accuse me of building a strawman argument, don’t you think? Lastly; do you think it’s okay he paid w/his life because of his BS?
September 15, 2025 at 6:50 PM
You literally said: white shooter debunked that bigoted logic. Literally… and you also named anti-left in your post as argument for him being a xenofobe. Then it’s hard to accuse me of building a strawman argument, don’t you think? Lastly; do you think it’s okay he paid w/his life because of his BS?
There are multiple laws that should protect anyone against that, not to say a moral compass to be able to say: violence is never the solution against speech, however much you might disagree with said speech. The fact that many people normalize that, is disgusting…
September 15, 2025 at 6:46 PM
There are multiple laws that should protect anyone against that, not to say a moral compass to be able to say: violence is never the solution against speech, however much you might disagree with said speech. The fact that many people normalize that, is disgusting…
That would be the same as saying; I saw one post of a right wing person that was actually quite nice, so now I have to conclude all the things said about the right are wrong. That’s equally as weird…
September 15, 2025 at 3:19 PM
That would be the same as saying; I saw one post of a right wing person that was actually quite nice, so now I have to conclude all the things said about the right are wrong. That’s equally as weird…
And again. What does that prove? That fact that this specific shooter was white debunks all Kirk has said about the black community? Regardless of whether you agree with his standpoints. Are you really making the argument that the skin color of the shooter debunks anything? That would be sad.
September 15, 2025 at 3:18 PM
And again. What does that prove? That fact that this specific shooter was white debunks all Kirk has said about the black community? Regardless of whether you agree with his standpoints. Are you really making the argument that the skin color of the shooter debunks anything? That would be sad.
So because the shooter was white, that debunks all things the right is saying? Are you sure?
September 15, 2025 at 5:51 AM
So because the shooter was white, that debunks all things the right is saying? Are you sure?
Funny. Responding in a post stating they can’t stop lying, with lies… what this shows is that both left en right extremes are uninformed crazy people, who will put identity politics way above being informed and talking facts.
September 15, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Funny. Responding in a post stating they can’t stop lying, with lies… what this shows is that both left en right extremes are uninformed crazy people, who will put identity politics way above being informed and talking facts.
2/2 that you adhere to the fact that gender is a social construct, doesn’t make that rule different. You can’t have it both ways.
September 14, 2025 at 8:55 AM
2/2 that you adhere to the fact that gender is a social construct, doesn’t make that rule different. You can’t have it both ways.
It is... Probably the most well known reasonable measure we had/have in sports for a very long time is the measure that Serena doesn’t have to play tennis against Roger, based on the biological difference between them, called male vs female. And Serena agrees. And Roger too bij the way. 1/2
September 14, 2025 at 8:53 AM
It is... Probably the most well known reasonable measure we had/have in sports for a very long time is the measure that Serena doesn’t have to play tennis against Roger, based on the biological difference between them, called male vs female. And Serena agrees. And Roger too bij the way. 1/2
So let me return the favor of educating you this time. every form of policy making always need clear parameters. You are not providing those paramaters, because you are not consistent in your viewpoint. And the reason is: there are all kinds of discrepancies in the way you set up your case.
September 13, 2025 at 11:10 PM
So let me return the favor of educating you this time. every form of policy making always need clear parameters. You are not providing those paramaters, because you are not consistent in your viewpoint. And the reason is: there are all kinds of discrepancies in the way you set up your case.
You call it reasonable measure. But who is deciding what is reasonable? You said it yourself, you think no one should have to dicslose medical history. So every criteria that asks for that (and some of the ioc criteria do just that), again, can be considered bigoted.
September 13, 2025 at 11:02 PM
You call it reasonable measure. But who is deciding what is reasonable? You said it yourself, you think no one should have to dicslose medical history. So every criteria that asks for that (and some of the ioc criteria do just that), again, can be considered bigoted.
2/2 because within the context where only the self identification is relevant (and that’s what the document suggests), every additional criterium will prevent some transwomen from competing. And every single one of those criteria can then be considered bigoted.
September 13, 2025 at 11:01 PM
2/2 because within the context where only the self identification is relevant (and that’s what the document suggests), every additional criterium will prevent some transwomen from competing. And every single one of those criteria can then be considered bigoted.
Again. Then you need to define what a transgender woman is. Is someone who identifies as a woman, but in no way is doing any form of transition, a woman in the context of this statement? Because if so, then you would have to agree that every kind of criteria the ioc is having should be banned. 1/2
September 13, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Again. Then you need to define what a transgender woman is. Is someone who identifies as a woman, but in no way is doing any form of transition, a woman in the context of this statement? Because if so, then you would have to agree that every kind of criteria the ioc is having should be banned. 1/2
… ultra progressive viewpoint that those things don’t matter, only because it suits your needs. It is about deeply rooted biology. I will not stand being accused of a bigoted upbringing just because a small group of people claims a truth that isn’t there. Maybe it is you who needs to be educated.
September 13, 2025 at 10:56 PM
… ultra progressive viewpoint that those things don’t matter, only because it suits your needs. It is about deeply rooted biology. I will not stand being accused of a bigoted upbringing just because a small group of people claims a truth that isn’t there. Maybe it is you who needs to be educated.
You probably won’t believe me, but I have raised her that way. And until recently an open bathroom was the norm in our house. But believe it or not; young boys and girls will at some point be aware of differences between them and act accordingly. My opinion is that THAT is the natural way, not some
September 13, 2025 at 10:52 PM
You probably won’t believe me, but I have raised her that way. And until recently an open bathroom was the norm in our house. But believe it or not; young boys and girls will at some point be aware of differences between them and act accordingly. My opinion is that THAT is the natural way, not some
Because your last statement is in no way compatible with your earlier statement that you would agree to rules within sports concerning trans athletes. Because there, genitals and medical history does play a part. If you want to be consistent, then that means the the IOC has to change the rules.
September 13, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Because your last statement is in no way compatible with your earlier statement that you would agree to rules within sports concerning trans athletes. Because there, genitals and medical history does play a part. If you want to be consistent, then that means the the IOC has to change the rules.
Well, then we will keep on disagreeing. And whether you call that bigotry or not, doesn’t really change that.
September 13, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Well, then we will keep on disagreeing. And whether you call that bigotry or not, doesn’t really change that.
I guess i didn’t make myself clear. I hate blocking people, but you are going to be the first schmaniel. As I said, I was done with you. Bye bye.
September 13, 2025 at 11:13 AM
I guess i didn’t make myself clear. I hate blocking people, but you are going to be the first schmaniel. As I said, I was done with you. Bye bye.