It’s interesting listening to NBC sports talk about other teams. They do not push the same narratives that they do against Spurs. It always seems like Ange is the root of all problems, whereas other coaches face no criticism

An essential component of statistics is context. Cherry-picking stats that fit a certain narrative is not the “truth”. There are fair criticisms of Ange (11th in the table for example), but many criticisms of him are either personal or manufactured

I get that Tah is a right footer, but I think he would be perfect for our system. Great aerially, fast, technical, and can lead. Personally, I feel like Ange may need to tweak our tactical setup, so having Tah’s versatility could really help