maxdaniel.bsky.social
@maxdaniel.bsky.social
Copyright infringement? 🤣
June 20, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Stepford wives was not intended to be a "how to" guide
June 16, 2025 at 1:26 AM
The videos on that channel are hilarious. Especially the creationists trying to take on Forrest Valkai and Gutsick Gibbon
June 16, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Twilight sparkle was responsible for wiping out all the hippogriffs in Narnia by using the force.

That's what you sound like.
No "god" is more real than any other. By saying "your religion/mythology is horrible but mine is good" is literally using the methods of people like Columbus & Cortez
February 6, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Congrats to all you "principled non voters" who were more interested in using Gaza as an excuse to throw a hissy fit than you were in actually protecting them
February 5, 2025 at 1:15 AM
All you're doing is cultural appropriation. It doesn't matter what your excuse is. Congratulations on copying the Roman Catholic Church 👍
February 5, 2025 at 1:09 AM
A science organization left muskyland? 😱
January 29, 2025 at 5:13 AM
You're claiming to "work" with an Egyptian deity and you're complaining about biblical characters being horrible people? 😆
January 29, 2025 at 5:00 AM
The Roseanne thing 😆
January 29, 2025 at 3:55 AM
So yeah, everything points to a MAGA fundie. It definitely does not even remotely point to a rational skeptical person.
January 29, 2025 at 3:53 AM
And not only that but I pointed out that you seem to be taking the gospels literally instead of seeing it as literature. And when you couldn't come up with an argument against that you just randomly changed the subject.
Your behavior during this whole ridiculous nonsense was irrational
January 29, 2025 at 3:53 AM
What started this whole event was you taking something from the Bible out of context to make it say the opposite of what it does (just like the whole "sin of empathy" thing that's been all over lately). And when you tried to say that it wasn't out of context, I proved that it was
January 29, 2025 at 3:53 AM
And again, you're clearly implying that you take the Bible literally. Only someone who takes it literally would treat what's in it as actual events in history would make the arguments that you're trying to make.
January 29, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Because you're actually acting like a MAGA fundie. And on top of changing the subject when confronted with evidence that contradicts your out of context use of a specific part of the Bible, you make assumptions based on no evidence. Also, only fundies refer to Jesus as yeshua.
January 29, 2025 at 3:53 AM
I'm trying to figure out why a MAGA fundie like you is on bluesky. First you're treating the Bible as if it's literally true, then taking biblical verses out of context to fit some delusional agenda, and when it's proven that you did take it out of context, you change the subject. 100%MAGA behavior
January 29, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Maybe you should leave reading ancient books to people who can develop independent thoughts instead of regurgitating irrational and hate based nonsense.
January 29, 2025 at 1:59 AM
It's a rhetorical device used by the authors of the gospels that was common at the time. The only way anyone could see this as "racist" is if they took the Bible 100% literally.
January 29, 2025 at 1:59 AM
He doesn't even understand the question 🙄
January 29, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Anyway, you left off the end therefore it's out of context
27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.” 28 Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
January 29, 2025 at 1:46 AM
Hopefully people will find ways to help 🏳️‍⚧️ people move to Minnesota
January 29, 2025 at 1:35 AM
You must be a fundie, because using out of context verses to prove their point is a classic fundie move
January 29, 2025 at 1:29 AM