@mcclooneyface.bsky.social
So with the best health care, least poverty, and highest median incomes, who exactly is getting exploited, exactly?
November 20, 2025 at 12:53 PM
So with the best health care, least poverty, and highest median incomes, who exactly is getting exploited, exactly?
It used to be more affordable until Democrats effed it up.
Now we are at the thick end of the wedge and Democrats want government to pay for everything, while Europe sways in opposite direction.
Get rid of Obamacare, return to private insurance with Medicaid and Medicare.
Now we are at the thick end of the wedge and Democrats want government to pay for everything, while Europe sways in opposite direction.
Get rid of Obamacare, return to private insurance with Medicaid and Medicare.
November 9, 2025 at 12:39 PM
It used to be more affordable until Democrats effed it up.
Now we are at the thick end of the wedge and Democrats want government to pay for everything, while Europe sways in opposite direction.
Get rid of Obamacare, return to private insurance with Medicaid and Medicare.
Now we are at the thick end of the wedge and Democrats want government to pay for everything, while Europe sways in opposite direction.
Get rid of Obamacare, return to private insurance with Medicaid and Medicare.
Except that... you can pay more each month if you want to. You aren't forced to pay off a 50 year mortgage over 50 years.
So you are looking at it the wrong way.
But of course you are.
So you are looking at it the wrong way.
But of course you are.
November 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM
Except that... you can pay more each month if you want to. You aren't forced to pay off a 50 year mortgage over 50 years.
So you are looking at it the wrong way.
But of course you are.
So you are looking at it the wrong way.
But of course you are.
There's no reason whatsoever to extend those subsidies. It has been discussed ad nauseam, as were the problems with Obamacare from day one.
November 9, 2025 at 12:17 PM
There's no reason whatsoever to extend those subsidies. It has been discussed ad nauseam, as were the problems with Obamacare from day one.
Reposted
The law was passed by the majority. The pandemic subsidies won't be extended.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
November 7, 2025 at 7:23 PM
The law was passed by the majority. The pandemic subsidies won't be extended.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
The law was passed by the majority. The pandemic subsidies won't be extended.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
November 7, 2025 at 7:23 PM
The law was passed by the majority. The pandemic subsidies won't be extended.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
A nation swimming in debt can't afford to cover over the massive failure of Obamacare and the lies from Democrats about how it would save consumers money, when now it needs massive subsidies just to stay afloat.
That's a stone at the FDR memorial, dummy. Its still there, go see.
October 24, 2025 at 1:23 PM
That's a stone at the FDR memorial, dummy. Its still there, go see.
Good job, you finally admitted Democrats are too blame.
You guys have become too radicalized now, you're basically communists.
You want to immortalize temporary pandemic subsidies for Obama care, national debt be damned!!!
And when it's all over you'll try to blame capitalism.
You guys have become too radicalized now, you're basically communists.
You want to immortalize temporary pandemic subsidies for Obama care, national debt be damned!!!
And when it's all over you'll try to blame capitalism.
October 19, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Good job, you finally admitted Democrats are too blame.
You guys have become too radicalized now, you're basically communists.
You want to immortalize temporary pandemic subsidies for Obama care, national debt be damned!!!
And when it's all over you'll try to blame capitalism.
You guys have become too radicalized now, you're basically communists.
You want to immortalize temporary pandemic subsidies for Obama care, national debt be damned!!!
And when it's all over you'll try to blame capitalism.
You be better off electing people who can simply govern.
There wouldn't be any openings to do anything then. The incompetence of the mayors of Portland and Chicago speaks louder than words.
You can't define yourself by hatred of one man. That's not a platform.
There wouldn't be any openings to do anything then. The incompetence of the mayors of Portland and Chicago speaks louder than words.
You can't define yourself by hatred of one man. That's not a platform.
October 14, 2025 at 11:11 AM
You be better off electing people who can simply govern.
There wouldn't be any openings to do anything then. The incompetence of the mayors of Portland and Chicago speaks louder than words.
You can't define yourself by hatred of one man. That's not a platform.
There wouldn't be any openings to do anything then. The incompetence of the mayors of Portland and Chicago speaks louder than words.
You can't define yourself by hatred of one man. That's not a platform.
No actual comprehension of journalism exists in left-wing spaces these days, because they selectively report facts and degenerate into howling screeds on demand.
I stopped paying attention many years ago.
Accepting your definition of journalism would be like defining ice cream as health food.
I stopped paying attention many years ago.
Accepting your definition of journalism would be like defining ice cream as health food.
October 14, 2025 at 8:48 AM
No actual comprehension of journalism exists in left-wing spaces these days, because they selectively report facts and degenerate into howling screeds on demand.
I stopped paying attention many years ago.
Accepting your definition of journalism would be like defining ice cream as health food.
I stopped paying attention many years ago.
Accepting your definition of journalism would be like defining ice cream as health food.
What I know of Bari Weiss doesn't come from a moron like Oliver. Or the pseudojournalists at the NYT, for that matter
October 14, 2025 at 8:45 AM
What I know of Bari Weiss doesn't come from a moron like Oliver. Or the pseudojournalists at the NYT, for that matter
It's remarkable that someone with the good reputation of Bari Weiss would take a chance on CBS News, but maybe she can make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
October 13, 2025 at 3:35 PM
It's remarkable that someone with the good reputation of Bari Weiss would take a chance on CBS News, but maybe she can make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
Bow down to the communists and see what it gets you in a few years.
They create worse problems.
They create worse problems.
September 11, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Bow down to the communists and see what it gets you in a few years.
They create worse problems.
They create worse problems.
I know you won't.
But you can repeat your delusional thoughts a million times and it won't win a following.
That's the truth. And no amount of threats will get you there either.
But you can repeat your delusional thoughts a million times and it won't win a following.
That's the truth. And no amount of threats will get you there either.
September 10, 2025 at 11:00 PM
I know you won't.
But you can repeat your delusional thoughts a million times and it won't win a following.
That's the truth. And no amount of threats will get you there either.
But you can repeat your delusional thoughts a million times and it won't win a following.
That's the truth. And no amount of threats will get you there either.
This is the kind of bullshit talk that PROMOTES real political violence.
Put a cork in it, lady.
Put a cork in it, lady.
September 10, 2025 at 10:56 PM
This is the kind of bullshit talk that PROMOTES real political violence.
Put a cork in it, lady.
Put a cork in it, lady.
This may be the first authentically funny thing I've seen in this joint.
August 2, 2025 at 9:53 AM
This may be the first authentically funny thing I've seen in this joint.
lol they don't ALL have to do it, it's a sign of weak circulation numbers.
I used to subscribe to NYT, now it's the WSJ. And I read it.
NYT became a propaganda arm.
I used to subscribe to NYT, now it's the WSJ. And I read it.
NYT became a propaganda arm.
August 2, 2025 at 9:51 AM
lol they don't ALL have to do it, it's a sign of weak circulation numbers.
I used to subscribe to NYT, now it's the WSJ. And I read it.
NYT became a propaganda arm.
I used to subscribe to NYT, now it's the WSJ. And I read it.
NYT became a propaganda arm.
Ok midwit, if that's all you have to say :)
July 29, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Ok midwit, if that's all you have to say :)
I'm not interesting in 'proving' anything to mollify racists who comes to the table with beliefs about people based on their skin color.
This is just a shoddy attempt to guilt and shame people into accepting a political agenda.
That's the root of the creative confabulations in the "1619 Project."
This is just a shoddy attempt to guilt and shame people into accepting a political agenda.
That's the root of the creative confabulations in the "1619 Project."
July 27, 2025 at 11:10 PM
I'm not interesting in 'proving' anything to mollify racists who comes to the table with beliefs about people based on their skin color.
This is just a shoddy attempt to guilt and shame people into accepting a political agenda.
That's the root of the creative confabulations in the "1619 Project."
This is just a shoddy attempt to guilt and shame people into accepting a political agenda.
That's the root of the creative confabulations in the "1619 Project."
Congratulations on trying to sanitize racism.
It's no working, by the way.
It's no working, by the way.
July 27, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Congratulations on trying to sanitize racism.
It's no working, by the way.
It's no working, by the way.
So you just assume that whjte people are awful unless they prove to you otherwise...how? Ok, suppose white people just assume they'll get robbed because of your skin color, until you prove otherwise, see how that works?
This racism benefits no one, which is why it's destroying the Democratic Party.
This racism benefits no one, which is why it's destroying the Democratic Party.
July 26, 2025 at 7:04 PM
So you just assume that whjte people are awful unless they prove to you otherwise...how? Ok, suppose white people just assume they'll get robbed because of your skin color, until you prove otherwise, see how that works?
This racism benefits no one, which is why it's destroying the Democratic Party.
This racism benefits no one, which is why it's destroying the Democratic Party.
You are declaring yourself an idiot.
Its not pretty to watch.
You and similar fools on this site should be embarrassed.
Its not pretty to watch.
You and similar fools on this site should be embarrassed.
June 19, 2025 at 11:04 AM
You are declaring yourself an idiot.
Its not pretty to watch.
You and similar fools on this site should be embarrassed.
Its not pretty to watch.
You and similar fools on this site should be embarrassed.
In a two party system, it makes perfect sense to vote for the lesser of two evils and then work on improving the result.
Voting for the lesser evil does not make one evil.
Voting for the lesser evil does not make one evil.
December 14, 2024 at 10:53 AM
In a two party system, it makes perfect sense to vote for the lesser of two evils and then work on improving the result.
Voting for the lesser evil does not make one evil.
Voting for the lesser evil does not make one evil.
Sweetheart, your friends spent almost FIVE times as much in 100 days, to lose the election.
Doesn't that run a little counter to your thesis???
Doesn't that run a little counter to your thesis???
December 11, 2024 at 11:54 PM
Sweetheart, your friends spent almost FIVE times as much in 100 days, to lose the election.
Doesn't that run a little counter to your thesis???
Doesn't that run a little counter to your thesis???