Mauricio Drelichman
@mdrelichman.bsky.social
2.3K followers 340 following 530 posts
Professor at UBC VSE. Economic History, photography, food.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Also known as the Argentine kryptonite tick.
Reposted by Mauricio Drelichman
ubcvse.bsky.social
Meet the Vancouver School of Economics’ 2025/26 PhD job market candidates! View their profiles here: economics.ubc.ca/people/phd-j... @plbeauregard.bsky.social
Reposted by Mauricio Drelichman
guidoalfani.bsky.social
Next Monday (Oct 6) the two-days conference "Inequality & History" will begin, hosted by @dondenacentre.bsky.social at Bocconi University (Milan). Join us to explore & debate inequality across history, from Classical Antiquity until today! Remote attendance possible; QR code in the program below👇
mdrelichman.bsky.social
We offer teaching assistantships, and a few (very competitive) scholarships. The exchange rate is your friend right now as well (but no guarantees).
mdrelichman.bsky.social
The political success of “photo radar does not reduce speed and is a cash grab” tells you all you need to know about the median voter.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
More ECON 101 content generated in real time!

Is this possibly a second best scenario though? US agricultural subsidies are incredibly distortionary, so kiboshing the sector, especially the large conglomerate bits, is not necessarily efficiency-reducing. An unorthodox way of doing it, to be sure.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Zotero 7 rocks. That's the skeet.
Reposted by Mauricio Drelichman
florianlouis.bsky.social
Gilles Postel-Vinay et Jean-Laurent Rosenthal - A Capital’s Capital

Two Hundred Years of Wealth and Inequality in Paris

À paraître en février aux Princeton UP
mdrelichman.bsky.social
The first lesson of ECON 101 is to never assume people are stupid. I’ll let you take it from there.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Excellent material for my next ECON 101 problem set.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Endogeneity at work. If Democratic leadership keeps their current tack on social issues, next time it will be 30-70.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
And it is this disconnect with their base that has cost the Democratic Party dearly in recent elections.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Rich suburban elites are an infinitesimal sliver of the Democratic support base. The big vote mass comes from the unions, which have occasionally been welcoming of immigrants, but traditionally strongly nativist.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
America is strongly nativist regardless of political stripes. Democrats are the party of “immigrants take our jobs”; Republicans are the party of “immigrants abuse our welfare system and rape our women”.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Reminds me of when we read the correspondence between the Fugger banking family principals and their agents throughout the Habsburg empire. Five lines about business, and two pages about fine wines and hunting dogs.
Reposted by Mauricio Drelichman
evanrobertsnz.bsky.social
No exaggeration to say there's a sentiment in urban planning that society should be limited to the living standards that were affordable in the 1920s. You don't see this implicit argument in many other areas of social and economic policy.
jensvb.bsky.social
Vancouver planners spelled out the answer to this very clearly:

Allowing larger laneway homes would be valuable for families, and planners believe that creating value is bad. Therefore homes sizes should be capped to be too small to be comfortable for families.
council.vancouver.ca/20090616/doc...
UNIT SIZE MAXIMUM and MINIMUM
Council Direction:
• Set a maximum unit size for LWH to balance achieving livable and diverse housing, while
minimizing any land value and redevelopment impacts.
Proposals:
• Set a maximum unit size based on lot size, to a maximum of 70m² (750 sq. ft.). This
allows for a 46.5m² (500 sq.ft.) studio and 1 bedroom units on 10.0m (33’) lots and up to
70m² (750 sq.ft.) 2 bedroom unit on wider lots (illustrated in Appendix M).
• Set a minimum size of 26m2 (280 sq.ft.) (relaxable to 19m2 /205 sq.ft.).
Discussion:
Some concern was expressed during the public process that LWH could increase land values to
the point where demolition of existing houses results. The recommendations in this report
address this concern in a number of ways (e.g., no strata titling). This concern also leads to
proposed regulations to limit LWH unit size. LWH floor space would not be included in or
added to the floor space ratio allowed for the principal house, but rather be considered as a
separate floor area that reflects the size of the lot, as is currently done with garages.
The proposed regulations have been set to allow a maximum of a 46m² (500 sq.ft.) LWH
dwelling unit (typically a one bedroom) on a 10.0m (33’)-wide lot, and a 70m² (750 sq.ft.)
LWH dwelling unit (typically a two bedroom) on a 15m (50’)-wide lot. LWH on larger lots
would also be limited to a maximum of 70m². These regulations allow for a range of viable
unit types and sizes, yet are not seen to significantly affect property values. (It should be
noted that these unit size limits refer to living space only and do not include any enclosed
parking/accessory uses. The total footprint of the LWH and enclosed parking is the same as a
garage; it is controlled by regulations in the “Where on Site” section.)
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Time for the annual reminder to graduate programs. Your recommendation form should have two steps, and two steps only:

1. Upload your letter in PDF format.
2. Submit.

National University of Singapore, you are doing it wrong. #nameandshame
mdrelichman.bsky.social
Full dislocation, yes. Partial, much more common.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
I got you beat. Dislocated my jaw from yawning too hard.
mdrelichman.bsky.social
It has started.

“I’ll be missing class today. Will you be covering anything important?”

No. I never cover anything important in class.