Lady M
banner
meredith3183.bsky.social
Lady M
@meredith3183.bsky.social
Cat lady, Rationalist, global citizen
Scumbag Grok.
December 14, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Why The Conversation published this piece of partisan commentary - rather than its usual dispassionate scientific analysis - is worrying. The article claims those who oppose "gender-affirming care" are "authoritarian". What they ignore as a factor is support for evidence and the scientific method.
June 13, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Rubbish
January 8, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Your loss.
January 8, 2025 at 5:03 PM
She was right.
January 8, 2025 at 5:03 PM

Wrong. She is brave to point out the impossibility of men literally becoming women. People can, of course, express their gender in a variety of ways but men can't literally become women.
January 8, 2025 at 5:02 PM
I don't hate people who want to express their "gender" in a variety of ways. But those trans activist thugs who claim, falsely, that men can literally become women are claiming something that is biologically impossible.
January 8, 2025 at 5:01 PM
JK Rowling is correct - there are no trans kids.
January 8, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Proud TERF says you are silly.
January 8, 2025 at 4:58 PM
No, she's actually correct in her analysis of the trans activist thug movement.
January 8, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Ha! Rubbish.
January 8, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Rubbish
January 8, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Sophie Molly not understanding JK Rowling (who is so much more subtle than Sophie).
January 8, 2025 at 4:56 PM