This seems to be an illustration that one of the skills in using AI (like any other coding tool) is developing the discernment when using AI is appropriate and when it’s the wrong tool for the job.

Thanks for highlighting this story. It seems like all parties believe that injustice was done and the whole situation is messy and full of nuance.

While this article focuses on the cat and mouse of the interview process, I’m curious what a hiring process might look like if the organization saw value in engineers leveraging AI tools and instead screened for applicants that used those tools effectively.

This makes a lot of sense - you’re prioritizing the design according to the primary users of the system - humans who live in relativistic time zones.

The “exact instant when this occurs relative to other events” is a secondary concern and can be derived as UTC when necessary.

There are parallels to physical fitness - are you trying to work on speed, power or endurance? And what technique are you employing to get them most out of it?

I’m curious if you could provide some examples of coping strategies and how you would distinguish goal vs accomplishment.

Beautiful and thought provoking. Our decisions about how we use technology to parent don’t just shape the act of parenting but also mold who we are as parents.