@micklebyme.bsky.social
you can't believe they want to humiliate and dominate?...
"You might want to sit down. I have some things to explain to you."
"You might want to sit down. I have some things to explain to you."
October 5, 2025 at 5:33 PM
you can't believe they want to humiliate and dominate?...
"You might want to sit down. I have some things to explain to you."
"You might want to sit down. I have some things to explain to you."
"fakakta decision-making"
the actions achieve aims, just not the stated or presumed or normal aims
the actions achieve aims, just not the stated or presumed or normal aims
October 5, 2025 at 5:28 PM
"fakakta decision-making"
the actions achieve aims, just not the stated or presumed or normal aims
the actions achieve aims, just not the stated or presumed or normal aims
"to justify their worldview"
is it simply a way to rationalize behavior
looking at how "they" are being poked and herded makes a lot more sense to me than hypothesizing rational decisions for which I fail to find evidence
is it simply a way to rationalize behavior
looking at how "they" are being poked and herded makes a lot more sense to me than hypothesizing rational decisions for which I fail to find evidence
October 5, 2025 at 5:18 PM
"to justify their worldview"
is it simply a way to rationalize behavior
looking at how "they" are being poked and herded makes a lot more sense to me than hypothesizing rational decisions for which I fail to find evidence
is it simply a way to rationalize behavior
looking at how "they" are being poked and herded makes a lot more sense to me than hypothesizing rational decisions for which I fail to find evidence
I'm reminded
Virginia Woolf's 1915 diary entry, "The future is dark, which is on the whole, the best thing the future can be, I think..." This concept is expanded by Rebecca Solnit in her book
Indigo Girls - Virginia Woolf (Live) with the Atlanta Symphony
youtu.be/oWVaJ7P8raE
Virginia Woolf's 1915 diary entry, "The future is dark, which is on the whole, the best thing the future can be, I think..." This concept is expanded by Rebecca Solnit in her book
Indigo Girls - Virginia Woolf (Live) with the Atlanta Symphony
youtu.be/oWVaJ7P8raE
October 3, 2025 at 9:27 PM
I'm reminded
Virginia Woolf's 1915 diary entry, "The future is dark, which is on the whole, the best thing the future can be, I think..." This concept is expanded by Rebecca Solnit in her book
Indigo Girls - Virginia Woolf (Live) with the Atlanta Symphony
youtu.be/oWVaJ7P8raE
Virginia Woolf's 1915 diary entry, "The future is dark, which is on the whole, the best thing the future can be, I think..." This concept is expanded by Rebecca Solnit in her book
Indigo Girls - Virginia Woolf (Live) with the Atlanta Symphony
youtu.be/oWVaJ7P8raE
it was the Tweet that caught my eye
and brought you to my thoughts 😉
and brought you to my thoughts 😉
October 3, 2025 at 9:13 PM
it was the Tweet that caught my eye
and brought you to my thoughts 😉
and brought you to my thoughts 😉
I'm suggesting elections have consequences and we must eschew anarchy.. especially of the "laws are when I agree" variety we see so clearly in those we wish to restrain
October 3, 2025 at 9:08 PM
I'm suggesting elections have consequences and we must eschew anarchy.. especially of the "laws are when I agree" variety we see so clearly in those we wish to restrain
I will happily take any and all @wizardkitty.bsky.social posts in whatever feed 🤗😁
September 28, 2025 at 4:48 PM
I will happily take any and all @wizardkitty.bsky.social posts in whatever feed 🤗😁
this is a feature not a bug
I'm confused how you can 'not see' this. a guiding tenet of their motivating narrative is "the levers of power have been captured by malign actors."
I'm confused how you can 'not see' this. a guiding tenet of their motivating narrative is "the levers of power have been captured by malign actors."
September 28, 2025 at 4:46 PM
this is a feature not a bug
I'm confused how you can 'not see' this. a guiding tenet of their motivating narrative is "the levers of power have been captured by malign actors."
I'm confused how you can 'not see' this. a guiding tenet of their motivating narrative is "the levers of power have been captured by malign actors."
maybe they are "waiting" because it sounds like a terrible idea
and I'm not sure 'interfering with a federal agent performing official duties' is so legal
and I'm not sure 'interfering with a federal agent performing official duties' is so legal
September 28, 2025 at 4:42 PM
maybe they are "waiting" because it sounds like a terrible idea
and I'm not sure 'interfering with a federal agent performing official duties' is so legal
and I'm not sure 'interfering with a federal agent performing official duties' is so legal
yeah un'Follow removed the account from Discover. maybe it just happened to have been prolific recently as none of my other Follow's is now over-represented
September 28, 2025 at 4:38 PM
yeah un'Follow removed the account from Discover. maybe it just happened to have been prolific recently as none of my other Follow's is now over-represented
I do love the art in its own right
KUDOS!
I also enjoy your *double entendre* with 'party', noting the subjective or affective connotation is not my first take
KUDOS!
I also enjoy your *double entendre* with 'party', noting the subjective or affective connotation is not my first take
September 28, 2025 at 4:18 PM
I do love the art in its own right
KUDOS!
I also enjoy your *double entendre* with 'party', noting the subjective or affective connotation is not my first take
KUDOS!
I also enjoy your *double entendre* with 'party', noting the subjective or affective connotation is not my first take
nice pic
is it commissioned specifically for this issue?
is it commissioned specifically for this issue?
September 28, 2025 at 3:38 PM
nice pic
is it commissioned specifically for this issue?
is it commissioned specifically for this issue?
offtopic but...
is it now 'to whoever'? I'd like 'to whomsoever' but probably use 'to whomever' 🤔
is it now 'to whoever'? I'd like 'to whomsoever' but probably use 'to whomever' 🤔
September 28, 2025 at 3:34 PM
offtopic but...
is it now 'to whoever'? I'd like 'to whomsoever' but probably use 'to whomever' 🤔
is it now 'to whoever'? I'd like 'to whomsoever' but probably use 'to whomever' 🤔
never mind. I figured it out
September 28, 2025 at 3:31 PM
never mind. I figured it out
can you help me figure out how to block jerks like yourself? 😁
that you take my comment as personal rather than adding to the critique of Yvette is telling, don't you think?
that you take my comment as personal rather than adding to the critique of Yvette is telling, don't you think?
September 28, 2025 at 3:30 PM
can you help me figure out how to block jerks like yourself? 😁
that you take my comment as personal rather than adding to the critique of Yvette is telling, don't you think?
that you take my comment as personal rather than adding to the critique of Yvette is telling, don't you think?
can ya be more specific about the "difference" Kimmel is making?
September 28, 2025 at 3:28 PM
can ya be more specific about the "difference" Kimmel is making?
the West are re-arming Israel. in what cognitive dissonance is this 'nothing'?
September 28, 2025 at 3:18 PM
the West are re-arming Israel. in what cognitive dissonance is this 'nothing'?
is 'full force' a term of art? does it exclude nukes?
September 28, 2025 at 3:05 PM
is 'full force' a term of art? does it exclude nukes?
my "problem" with this thread is that it supposes Drumpf ever tells the truth 🙄
September 28, 2025 at 2:45 PM
my "problem" with this thread is that it supposes Drumpf ever tells the truth 🙄
informative, interesting. kudos👍
~28:45 you note absent moral leg of tripart hegemon rationale, after 31:45 seem to imply UK are wrong to remain enthralled. pls elaborate alternative(s) you see
hasten inevitable US punishment of UK before Euro military independence? won't this prolong transition?
~28:45 you note absent moral leg of tripart hegemon rationale, after 31:45 seem to imply UK are wrong to remain enthralled. pls elaborate alternative(s) you see
hasten inevitable US punishment of UK before Euro military independence? won't this prolong transition?
September 16, 2025 at 8:40 PM
informative, interesting. kudos👍
~28:45 you note absent moral leg of tripart hegemon rationale, after 31:45 seem to imply UK are wrong to remain enthralled. pls elaborate alternative(s) you see
hasten inevitable US punishment of UK before Euro military independence? won't this prolong transition?
~28:45 you note absent moral leg of tripart hegemon rationale, after 31:45 seem to imply UK are wrong to remain enthralled. pls elaborate alternative(s) you see
hasten inevitable US punishment of UK before Euro military independence? won't this prolong transition?