Mike Spencer Chapman
@mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
210 followers 180 following 23 posts
Haematology doctor & researcher, UK. Interested in blood ageing, transplant, cancer and development. Lapsed musician.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
So pleased to have the paper out, available here: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08423-8
For me this was discovery science as I had always hoped it would be. A lot of fun, and some proper detective work with plenty of twists & turns on the way. Brief thread below
Reposted by Mike Spencer Chapman
sangerinstitute.bsky.social
The abnormal gene which causes chronic myeloid leukaemia has a very strong ability to drive rapid growth of the cancer, research has revealed 🧬

Scientists were able to track the evolution of this gene to study the rate at which the cancer cells expand: bit.ly/42riKOk
Image shows chromosome pairs with abnormal, stunted, chromosome 22 which causes chronic myeloid leukaemia. Credit: Nangalia Research Group.
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Lovely piece from @s-j-aitken.bsky.social and Claudia Arnedo Pec discussing our recent paper in @nature.com on persistent mutagenic DNA lesions... Love the title!

Puts it in the context of their beautiful previous work on lesion segregation
s-j-aitken.bsky.social
🧩DNA Lesions Piece Together Impossible Trees🧩

This was a fun piece to write (and illustrate!) with Dr Claudia Arnedo Pac about @mikespencerchapman.bsky.social and co’s recent @nature.com paper. Thank you for the invitation, Maria @cp-trendsgenetics.bsky.social

authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S...
A person made up of jigsaw pieces representing the millions and millions of unique cells with unique genomes, which build a picture of our lifetime of cellular experiences. 
Four panels, anticlockwise from top left, highlight key findings. (i) Phylogeny-violating variants (PVVs) caused by persistent DNA lesions explain otherwise ‘impossible’ trees. (ii) An estimate (in chronological time) of when lesions were acquired and for how long they persist. (iii) Demonstration in vivo that individual DNA lesions can give rise to both single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions or deletions (indels) in different cell cycles; this is a form of multiallelic variation, which more commonly relates to two alternate SNVs at the same site. (iv) Identification of lesion segregation of APOBEC mutagenesis, implicating that genome-wide mutagenesis occurred within a single cell cycle and that lesion segregation could explain the strand coordination of clustered APOBEC mutations commonly seen in cancer genomes.
Reposted by Mike Spencer Chapman
leifludwig.bsky.social
Interested in 'Mitochondrial single cell-multi-omics for lineage tracing and genetics'? Apply for our free workshop in Berlin following our #ISCO2025 conference!

www.isco-conference.eu

www.mdc-berlin.de/news/events/...
Mitochondrial single cell-multi-omics for lineage tracing and genetics
www.mdc-berlin.de
Reposted by Mike Spencer Chapman
mchasselluhn.bsky.social
Is hypothesis generation a hindrance to Night Science? @itaiyanai.bsky.social and @stearnslab.bsky.social demonstrated how easy we fall into pattern recognition, missing the “Gorilla” in our own data. Today’s seminar was all about identifying new strategies to stay curious about our own data.
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Thanks Trevor! I remember this was the PhD chapter that probably sparked the most viva discussion.. ☺️
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Ha.. yeah, the big question! Not really unfortunately. We think it is probably structurally non-bulky so as not to substantially stall the replication machinery. And may relate to the hypoxic niche of HSCs. I know others have also speculated that aldehydes may be involved.. Any theories welcome!
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing! And apologies for the cheap kitten meme..
sangerinstitute.bsky.social
Check out @mikespencerchapman.bsky.social's thread below to find out more about his latest @nature.com paper on DNA damage ⤵️
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
In science, we often see weird blips in the data. The question: is it artefact (usually!), or something new & exciting? We don’t always have time to dig deep.

Our paper in @nature.com today came from just such a blip. So don’t ignore the weird stuff. Pull on that thread...
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Thanks Andrew. Yeah, an exciting discovery is rarely the end result! But great when it is
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Ha! Love it.. need to get a copy of that for my wall
Reposted by Mike Spencer Chapman
trevorgraham.bsky.social
This is a cool paper about the surprisingly long-term persistence of DNA lesions (single stranded DNA errors) in the human body. Exquisitely meticulous work from conception through to execution. Congratulations @mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
So pleased to have the paper out, available here: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08423-8
For me this was discovery science as I had always hoped it would be. A lot of fun, and some proper detective work with plenty of twists & turns on the way. Brief thread below
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Yes! @s-j-aitken.bsky.social your fantastic work on lesion segregation really was the foundation for this.. gave us early confidence that some lesions were able to persist through multiple cell divisions & that our theory was viable
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
A huge thank you to Peter Campbell, my supervisor whose insights were vital to getting this study started. When I showed him the 1st unexpected mutation he said (typically) ‘I wondered if this might happen..’ Also, thanks to @imartincorena.bsky.social & @timcoorens.bsky.social for valuable advice.
a close up of a statue of yoda with the words `` thank you wise one '' written below him .
ALT: a close up of a statue of yoda with the words `` thank you wise one '' written below him .
media.tenor.com
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Also, the whole idea of these persistent lesions builds on the concept of 'lesion segregation' observed (again, unexpectedly) and developed by
@s-j-aitken.bsky.social , Martin Taylor, Duncan Odom & team.
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
This discovery science is only possible thanks to the large-scale somatic phylogeny datasets re-analysed here, generated by Emily Mitchell, Stan Ng, Matthias Wilk,Kenichi Yoshida,Jyoti Nangalia+others, funded by @cancerresearchuk.org @sangerinstitute.bsky.social @wellcometrust.bsky.social + others
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
Intriguingly, blood stem cells had a particular type of very long-lasting damage (~2-3 years), leading to 15-20% of their mutations – some contributing to cancer. This damage wasn’t evident in other tissues. We have theories, but we don’t yet know why.
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
It was these patterns of unusual mutation inheritance, or multiple different mutations at the same site in closely related cells that was the key to recognizing & characterizing these unusual types of long-lasting damage.
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
If the base is partially recognizable, the DNA copying machinery may flip between copying it right, and copying it wrong in one specific way. This will only cause 1 mutation, but the pattern of inheritance will not fit a single acquisition event (a ‘phylogeny-violating variant’)
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
But what if it’s not? If the DNA damage sticks around through multiple rounds of cell division & DNA replication it may be misread in different ways in each round. This will lead to different mistakes at the same position (a ‘multi-allelic variant’).
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
If the damaged base is present during DNA replication it may be misread, resulting in permanent mutations that can contribute to cancer development. However, the DNA damage itself is usually recognized and mended quickly by repair mechanisms in our cells.
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
How did we work this out?

DNA damage is distinct from a mutation. While a mutation is one of the 4 standard DNA bases (A, G, T or C) in the wrong place (like a spelling mistake), DNA damage is chemically altered DNA (more like some illegible writing).
mikespencerchapman.bsky.social
After ‘pulling the thread’ we found the explanation. Some specific types of DNA damage persist unrepaired through multiple cell divisions, in some cases for years. This goes against the usual idea that damage is efficiently repaired by the cell’s DNA repair machinery.