Miriam Janssen
@mimijanssen.bsky.social
30 followers 60 following 10 posts
Grad researcher in the MVDM lab @Dartmouth studying value learning and memory | NSF grfp & E.E. Just grad fellow 🐭🐵🐀
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mimijanssen.bsky.social
We are excited about the next steps, such as determining causality and the circuit mechanisms of SWR-DA coupling, as well as whether replay content of different valences is evaluated differently. :) (9/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
Building on earlier findings (Gomperts et al., 2015), our work shows that DAergic transients known to drive learning in response to online experienced events are also present following offline replayed events. (8/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
To characterize the SWR-DA, we fit LMMs. We found that the SWR-DA size could not be explained by the differences in track running speed (a proxy for motivation) or by the magnitude of the prediction error coding during the task. (7/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
Averaging across all sessions and mice, we found an increase in DA peaking ~0.3 s after SWRs! The SWR-DA transient was about 24% of the size of a putative positive RPE. (6/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
Next, during a rest period before or after the task, we found SWR-triggered DA transients (SWR-DA). Here are some examples from three different sessions and mice (MUA: black tick marks; local field potential traces: blue line; GRABDA2m fiber photometry traces: green line). (5/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
Consistent with previous work, we found a clear suppression of the dopamine concentration ([DA]) signal following reward omission relative to the expected (medium) amount, and a clear increase in [DA] following larger-than-expected reward. (4/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
First, we established what putative VS DA prediction errors look like in our hands by measuring the GRAB-DA signal on a probabilistic reward task. Mice ran on a linear track where rewards of different sizes were delivered at both ends. (3/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
Leading computational theories (e.g. Mattar & Daw, 2018) suggest that replayed experiences drive learning via a teaching signal (e.g.prediction errors). To test if this may be true within the brain, we investigated the link between putative dCA1 replay events (SWRs) and VS DA teaching signals. (2/9)
mimijanssen.bsky.social
Hung-tu Chen, Nicolas Tritsch, Matt van der Meer, and I have submitted a new preprint (doi.org/10.1101/2025...) in which we use simultaneous hippocampal ephys and ventral striatal (VS) fiber photometry to establish a link between sharp-wave ripples (SWRs) and VS dopamine (DA) in mice. (1/9)
Ventral Striatal Dopamine Increases following Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples
Leading theories suggest that hippocampal replay drives offline learning through coupling with an internal teaching signal such as ventral striatal dopamine (DA); however, the relationship between hip...
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Miriam Janssen
mvandermeer.bsky.social
We are looking for a research assistant/lab manager to join the lab! A supportive, collaborative environment where you can learn neural recording with Neuropixels, optogenetics, fiber photometry, and neural data analysis.