www.nudistdiaries.com
Here is the image in question.
Now, the only part of that ToS I can even begin to think it could possibly fall under is 'intimate', but if we are classing a family photo as a bannable 'intimate' suggestive work...
Here is the image in question.
Now, the only part of that ToS I can even begin to think it could possibly fall under is 'intimate', but if we are classing a family photo as a bannable 'intimate' suggestive work...
Don't fall for the angry rhetoric. The only people destroying your livelihood are billionaires.. Not your neighbours.
Don't fall for the angry rhetoric. The only people destroying your livelihood are billionaires.. Not your neighbours.
Perhaps I'm being a little too literal.
Perhaps I'm being a little too literal.
A thread:
Take these two images. For most people, the one on the left, while possibly uncomfortable, wouldn't ellicit much more than a 'gross' or 'ick' from the most prurient. However, the image on the right, at worst, would be seen as child exploitation.
A thread:
Take these two images. For most people, the one on the left, while possibly uncomfortable, wouldn't ellicit much more than a 'gross' or 'ick' from the most prurient. However, the image on the right, at worst, would be seen as child exploitation.
It's up to US to break free
It's up to US to break free