@mitch14k.bsky.social
Positive PR for the company that just got a large infusion from only the “best people” who of course serve public interests and philanthropy- JP Morgan, Blackrock and a Qatari funded organization. I see NOTHING but positive change from this endeavor. 😒😒😒😒😒😒
February 13, 2026 at 12:30 PM
Positive PR for the company that just got a large infusion from only the “best people” who of course serve public interests and philanthropy- JP Morgan, Blackrock and a Qatari funded organization. I see NOTHING but positive change from this endeavor. 😒😒😒😒😒😒
😒🙄 do you recycle the same article and just change the authors because this is a diatribe that has been spewed every other week in the first presidency and now recaptured for the second. Is this just to keep the “liberals” pacified and hopeful?
February 13, 2026 at 12:27 PM
😒🙄 do you recycle the same article and just change the authors because this is a diatribe that has been spewed every other week in the first presidency and now recaptured for the second. Is this just to keep the “liberals” pacified and hopeful?
Ship has sailed.
February 13, 2026 at 12:25 PM
Ship has sailed.
That means they will have to ALSO restructure the entire curriculum of the MBA - which they have not done. This is a feel good story - cute but no depth beyond this case study.
February 13, 2026 at 12:21 PM
That means they will have to ALSO restructure the entire curriculum of the MBA - which they have not done. This is a feel good story - cute but no depth beyond this case study.
They never challenged the Boomer generation to reclaim a destiny stolen. They wanted to be silent so the pity will be silent as well.
February 13, 2026 at 11:17 AM
They never challenged the Boomer generation to reclaim a destiny stolen. They wanted to be silent so the pity will be silent as well.
This opinion is garbage. Just skip it - the author postulates a narrative that he clearly got while reading his morning paper on the toilet. Do better Politico - these “articles” are eroding your already frail credibility.
February 13, 2026 at 11:02 AM
This opinion is garbage. Just skip it - the author postulates a narrative that he clearly got while reading his morning paper on the toilet. Do better Politico - these “articles” are eroding your already frail credibility.
Everything about this article is anti-common sense. How can a country that is actively promoting and working towards automation would then be focused on improving the “workshop”. China doesn’t face the massive anti-intellectual movement in the West….there are consummate holes in this narrative.
February 13, 2026 at 10:52 AM
Everything about this article is anti-common sense. How can a country that is actively promoting and working towards automation would then be focused on improving the “workshop”. China doesn’t face the massive anti-intellectual movement in the West….there are consummate holes in this narrative.
See here folks…..this is how they manufacture consent. Thank the media as they are 💯 complicit in the chaos that is going on around the world.
February 13, 2026 at 10:48 AM
See here folks…..this is how they manufacture consent. Thank the media as they are 💯 complicit in the chaos that is going on around the world.
He is not a populist. Seek a deeper reason why he is doing this…I bet it will be self-serving. This journalist needs to do better.
February 13, 2026 at 10:41 AM
He is not a populist. Seek a deeper reason why he is doing this…I bet it will be self-serving. This journalist needs to do better.
This is an article suitable for the Onion considering there is fascism right now in the US. Maybe step off the soapbox and look around for the “liberal values” you are postulating are in the “West”.
February 13, 2026 at 10:37 AM
This is an article suitable for the Onion considering there is fascism right now in the US. Maybe step off the soapbox and look around for the “liberal values” you are postulating are in the “West”.
EV isn’t a bubble- China is thriving. Poor article as usual.
February 13, 2026 at 10:28 AM
EV isn’t a bubble- China is thriving. Poor article as usual.
I am also a social democrat and I don’t know what you call them other than “liberal”. I don’t know why you are confused.
February 12, 2026 at 11:20 AM
I am also a social democrat and I don’t know what you call them other than “liberal”. I don’t know why you are confused.
Oh I remember the CONFIDENCE all the pundits had about the rock solid professionals at the DOJ, FBI and military leadership…..especially the DOJ…..while several of these parties were sitting on the Epstein files. Yeah….
February 12, 2026 at 4:52 AM
Oh I remember the CONFIDENCE all the pundits had about the rock solid professionals at the DOJ, FBI and military leadership…..especially the DOJ…..while several of these parties were sitting on the Epstein files. Yeah….
I remember when these same acolytes were convincing us about the rock solid professionals at the DOJ……while they were hiding the Epstein files 😒
February 12, 2026 at 4:50 AM
I remember when these same acolytes were convincing us about the rock solid professionals at the DOJ……while they were hiding the Epstein files 😒
It’s really concerning the hubris by which liberals who desperately want to believe the system in their control are still so gullible and naive to how insidious the rot in our institutions has permeated. The naivety is dangerous.
February 12, 2026 at 4:41 AM
It’s really concerning the hubris by which liberals who desperately want to believe the system in their control are still so gullible and naive to how insidious the rot in our institutions has permeated. The naivety is dangerous.
Undoubtedly the best representation of life in Corporate America I have ever seen.
February 12, 2026 at 3:39 AM
Undoubtedly the best representation of life in Corporate America I have ever seen.
It is the most realistic portrayal of Corporate America I have ever seen.
February 12, 2026 at 3:38 AM
It is the most realistic portrayal of Corporate America I have ever seen.
You do you I guess.
February 11, 2026 at 5:37 PM
You do you I guess.
There is an option C. There is room to be skeptical and reserved about proclamations about government competency in current times. Additionally, there is little need to condescend to people who express skepticism considering we JUST wrote off QAnon and unfortunately, they weren’t way off base….
February 11, 2026 at 5:30 PM
There is an option C. There is room to be skeptical and reserved about proclamations about government competency in current times. Additionally, there is little need to condescend to people who express skepticism considering we JUST wrote off QAnon and unfortunately, they weren’t way off base….
MAYBE if you all weren’t so comfortable in the status quo, you would have been more critical and skeptical BEFORE we ended up here.
February 11, 2026 at 5:19 PM
MAYBE if you all weren’t so comfortable in the status quo, you would have been more critical and skeptical BEFORE we ended up here.
Yeah, that’s why you jumped all up on my nuts. I pointed out hubris and delusion and you co-endorsed the dreamworld you are so anxious to keep alive when reality has shown is differently. It’s hard for the rest of us to wait for you guys to catch up
February 11, 2026 at 5:18 PM
Yeah, that’s why you jumped all up on my nuts. I pointed out hubris and delusion and you co-endorsed the dreamworld you are so anxious to keep alive when reality has shown is differently. It’s hard for the rest of us to wait for you guys to catch up
I bet a lot of endings of movies surprise you…..
February 11, 2026 at 5:14 PM
I bet a lot of endings of movies surprise you…..
I bet you also thought there would be NO WAY that there would be a gigantic conspiracy to hide the facts of a sex trafficking operation by BOTH side of the aisle….that would be INSANE. NO WAY the LIFELONG PROFESSIONALS in the DOJ, Federal Government would EVER let that happen 😒
February 11, 2026 at 5:14 PM
I bet you also thought there would be NO WAY that there would be a gigantic conspiracy to hide the facts of a sex trafficking operation by BOTH side of the aisle….that would be INSANE. NO WAY the LIFELONG PROFESSIONALS in the DOJ, Federal Government would EVER let that happen 😒
Either way, it clearly is illustrative that the numbers SHOULD be subject to question and condescending to critical thinking individuals.
February 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM
Either way, it clearly is illustrative that the numbers SHOULD be subject to question and condescending to critical thinking individuals.