AI in general has an integration issue. While APIs exist, integrating them into products and having them direct product specific functions is currently nearly impossible. I think its need to learn to walk before it can run.

I'm of the opinion that narcotics being illegal only serves the interests of criminals.

I wouldn't support any type of censorship whatsoever. Shielding the young from reality does them disservice. We are creatures that are evolutionarily designed to cope with all forms of trauma and trying to sanitise the world, ostensibly for the protection of the young, is questionable.

Perhaps in the future, right now I suspect it could be jailbroken with a little effort. There is also the problematic area of advocating changes in the law. Many things are considered illegal, but its not illegal to advocate for change. Take narcotics for example, where do you draw the line?

Yes, as well as an appeals process that is separate from those responsible for taking action on the account in the first place. Any non-transparent processes should not be used.

A simple icon on their profile pics, say an exclamation mark, would be sufficient.

If censorship, of any form, is occurring it should be subject to a very clear notice to both the poster and any reader.

That's been going on for quite a while. X is notorious for it. There are certain themes which have three letter agency bots assigned to them to muddy the waters.