Non è questa la risposta alla mia domanda

The players criticizing the verdict are mistaken. The 3-month suspension results from an agreement proposed (twice) by WADA, which Sinner accepted to close the case.
By the way, have you read the BBC article on this, or just listened to some uninformed players?

I am nobody, so I will respond with the words of someone who knows more than I do about the world of tennis, Feliciano Lopez: "the lack of empathy given the circumstances to someone who proved himself innocent is beyond DISAPPOINTING"

What part of that don’t you understand?

I don’t understand why I keep trying to explain things to people who have no interest in educating themselves. If you say that gravity is in the second time, it means you haven’t understood that it’s the same event (one week later). Did you not understand, or are you pretending not to?

So you’re suggesting that it’s fair to ban someone for 1 or 2 years if they were accidentally contaminated with a substance in an amount that doesn’t affect their performance? Especially considering that starting in 2027, there won’t be any cases for the same amount?”

Spiegami, tu domani ti trasferisci all'estero, non godi di nessun servizio in Italia, torni a casa a Natale per salutare i parenti. Continui a pagare le tasse in Italia? Io no ma alzo le mani se tu hai anche solo il coraggio di dire di sì 🙌🏼

Please inform yourself, Sinner was banned for strict liability, we are not speaking about doping

Please inform yourself:
- WADA proposed the settlement
- the appeal does not regard doping but strict liability

Please inform yourself:
1 - WADA proposed the settlement
2 - ban is the result of negligence

#stopmisinformation
#behonest

Right choice to hide (here), considering you don't even try to repeat what you actually wrote there