moonbeamsassafrass
@moonbeamsassafrass.bsky.social
Name is Maggie~RN🏥🩺~LOVEs Music🎵~ Hippie chick 🐥💙☮️🕊️🫶💙Music heals ya~Dance into your day💃 & it can only be a good one~DMs= BLOCK~Still in shock Nov 6th😱~God Help Us🌹💙Da Bears🏈 I don't follow anyone with no content on their profile 🥀🌹🥀 #BulletBallots
Your response actually made more sense to me. Like the vote was to enforce the subpoenas. I appreciate you correcting it though. A lot of ppl wouldn't care if they passed along inaccurate info 💙
November 17, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Your response actually made more sense to me. Like the vote was to enforce the subpoenas. I appreciate you correcting it though. A lot of ppl wouldn't care if they passed along inaccurate info 💙
You're right I didn't even think of that. Thank you
November 14, 2025 at 7:33 PM
You're right I didn't even think of that. Thank you
no doubt about it~I was mocking him because he is sucking up to him
November 12, 2025 at 6:10 AM
no doubt about it~I was mocking him because he is sucking up to him
Thank you!
November 12, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Thank you!
this is from a year ago~I got so excited thinking she had complied with the court order for her to allow Jack Smith to release his full report!
November 11, 2025 at 7:04 PM
this is from a year ago~I got so excited thinking she had complied with the court order for her to allow Jack Smith to release his full report!
non-political~Those seem to always come right before they rule on something huge; like Immunity for trump.
Anyone paying attention can see the game being played
4/4
Anyone paying attention can see the game being played
4/4
November 11, 2025 at 6:06 PM
non-political~Those seem to always come right before they rule on something huge; like Immunity for trump.
Anyone paying attention can see the game being played
4/4
Anyone paying attention can see the game being played
4/4
reverse the 2015 decision they would also be overturning their rulings on Loving and
the legalization of Birth Control from the 1960s
They declined the case to avoid putting themselves in that position. IMO
We have seen SCOTUS rulings that seem to suggest they are impartial &
3/3
the legalization of Birth Control from the 1960s
They declined the case to avoid putting themselves in that position. IMO
We have seen SCOTUS rulings that seem to suggest they are impartial &
3/3
November 11, 2025 at 6:06 PM
reverse the 2015 decision they would also be overturning their rulings on Loving and
the legalization of Birth Control from the 1960s
They declined the case to avoid putting themselves in that position. IMO
We have seen SCOTUS rulings that seem to suggest they are impartial &
3/3
the legalization of Birth Control from the 1960s
They declined the case to avoid putting themselves in that position. IMO
We have seen SCOTUS rulings that seem to suggest they are impartial &
3/3
rule in favor of Same-sex marriage; MAGA & especially Bigoted Heritage Foundation would be outraged
But..if they rule to overturn it,
one of their very own corrupt members would be impacted
Same sex marriage & Inter-racial marriage were both passed on the 14th amendment. If SCOTUS were to
2/4
But..if they rule to overturn it,
one of their very own corrupt members would be impacted
Same sex marriage & Inter-racial marriage were both passed on the 14th amendment. If SCOTUS were to
2/4
November 11, 2025 at 6:06 PM
rule in favor of Same-sex marriage; MAGA & especially Bigoted Heritage Foundation would be outraged
But..if they rule to overturn it,
one of their very own corrupt members would be impacted
Same sex marriage & Inter-racial marriage were both passed on the 14th amendment. If SCOTUS were to
2/4
But..if they rule to overturn it,
one of their very own corrupt members would be impacted
Same sex marriage & Inter-racial marriage were both passed on the 14th amendment. If SCOTUS were to
2/4