@mrdetermined.bsky.social
Nope! You need a better Democratic party, but it's going to be the Democratic party. Third parties go nowhere with our electoral system.
January 25, 2026 at 3:06 AM
Nope! You need a better Democratic party, but it's going to be the Democratic party. Third parties go nowhere with our electoral system.
That's a surefire path to losing and irrelevancy.
January 25, 2026 at 3:05 AM
That's a surefire path to losing and irrelevancy.
No, we've established that your argument based on what other people think is detached from any empirical data. It's just your impression.
So that's what we're working with.
And what people THINK is less meaningful than any reality. And we both know that the reality is harder than people THINK.
So that's what we're working with.
And what people THINK is less meaningful than any reality. And we both know that the reality is harder than people THINK.
January 25, 2026 at 1:57 AM
No, we've established that your argument based on what other people think is detached from any empirical data. It's just your impression.
So that's what we're working with.
And what people THINK is less meaningful than any reality. And we both know that the reality is harder than people THINK.
So that's what we're working with.
And what people THINK is less meaningful than any reality. And we both know that the reality is harder than people THINK.
She was a superior candidate- that is not up for debate.
Provide evidence that she was not superior to Trump as a potential president. The results are NOT evidence. Go-
Provide evidence that she was not superior to Trump as a potential president. The results are NOT evidence. Go-
January 25, 2026 at 1:55 AM
She was a superior candidate- that is not up for debate.
Provide evidence that she was not superior to Trump as a potential president. The results are NOT evidence. Go-
Provide evidence that she was not superior to Trump as a potential president. The results are NOT evidence. Go-
I'm not here to convince anyone who is not serious.
I'm merely proving how you are not serious and have no argument.
I'm merely proving how you are not serious and have no argument.
January 25, 2026 at 1:52 AM
I'm not here to convince anyone who is not serious.
I'm merely proving how you are not serious and have no argument.
I'm merely proving how you are not serious and have no argument.
Stop asking off-subject questions when you barely answer what I ask.
So you are basing this impression just on personal experience and not on any empirical data- correct?
So you are basing this impression just on personal experience and not on any empirical data- correct?
January 25, 2026 at 1:52 AM
Stop asking off-subject questions when you barely answer what I ask.
So you are basing this impression just on personal experience and not on any empirical data- correct?
So you are basing this impression just on personal experience and not on any empirical data- correct?
Since she was inarguably superior as a candidate, the onus is completely on the voters and you can't argue that.
January 25, 2026 at 1:51 AM
Since she was inarguably superior as a candidate, the onus is completely on the voters and you can't argue that.
1) The case was made just by looking at both candidates, and no one can argue that. Why are you?
2) No. There are 2 separate parts of any campaign. One is to win the race before them. Another MAY be to build a network for further campaigns.
2) No. There are 2 separate parts of any campaign. One is to win the race before them. Another MAY be to build a network for further campaigns.
January 25, 2026 at 1:50 AM
1) The case was made just by looking at both candidates, and no one can argue that. Why are you?
2) No. There are 2 separate parts of any campaign. One is to win the race before them. Another MAY be to build a network for further campaigns.
2) No. There are 2 separate parts of any campaign. One is to win the race before them. Another MAY be to build a network for further campaigns.
So you can't back up your claims because you're full of crap. Thanks for confirming it again.
January 25, 2026 at 1:49 AM
So you can't back up your claims because you're full of crap. Thanks for confirming it again.
No, it's just that you're losing and have no argument. As I've proven every time.
January 25, 2026 at 1:48 AM
No, it's just that you're losing and have no argument. As I've proven every time.
Explain how a minority party stops a budget in the House.
Oh, you didn't mention that 206 of the 213 House Dems voted against it because you are losing and have no argument.
Oh, you didn't mention that 206 of the 213 House Dems voted against it because you are losing and have no argument.
January 25, 2026 at 1:48 AM
Explain how a minority party stops a budget in the House.
Oh, you didn't mention that 206 of the 213 House Dems voted against it because you are losing and have no argument.
Oh, you didn't mention that 206 of the 213 House Dems voted against it because you are losing and have no argument.
Nope! They are a standard legal tactic. Jack Smith just decided to go from the top down.
The problem here is a major political party that is complicit and corrupt judges, including SCOTUS ones. Confirm or explain.
The problem here is a major political party that is complicit and corrupt judges, including SCOTUS ones. Confirm or explain.
January 25, 2026 at 1:47 AM
Nope! They are a standard legal tactic. Jack Smith just decided to go from the top down.
The problem here is a major political party that is complicit and corrupt judges, including SCOTUS ones. Confirm or explain.
The problem here is a major political party that is complicit and corrupt judges, including SCOTUS ones. Confirm or explain.
Nope! Thanks for losing!
January 25, 2026 at 1:45 AM
Nope! Thanks for losing!
Nope! Love how I'm reality-based and you keep proving that you're not. 👍
January 25, 2026 at 1:45 AM
Nope! Love how I'm reality-based and you keep proving that you're not. 👍
Based upon what do you say "people" think that?
January 25, 2026 at 1:44 AM
Based upon what do you say "people" think that?
Nope!
Please show where Harris directed the invasion of another nation as VP.
Also, please show where she refused to concede an election and started a riot and an insurrection.
When you DON'T it will confirm you're lying and I'm right- AGAIN.
Please show where Harris directed the invasion of another nation as VP.
Also, please show where she refused to concede an election and started a riot and an insurrection.
When you DON'T it will confirm you're lying and I'm right- AGAIN.
January 25, 2026 at 1:43 AM
Nope!
Please show where Harris directed the invasion of another nation as VP.
Also, please show where she refused to concede an election and started a riot and an insurrection.
When you DON'T it will confirm you're lying and I'm right- AGAIN.
Please show where Harris directed the invasion of another nation as VP.
Also, please show where she refused to concede an election and started a riot and an insurrection.
When you DON'T it will confirm you're lying and I'm right- AGAIN.
I keep pointing out that Harris is superior to Trump in every way, so your question is pointless. Next!
January 25, 2026 at 1:42 AM
I keep pointing out that Harris is superior to Trump in every way, so your question is pointless. Next!
That would be the GOP.
Please provide links to compare Dem funding vs. the GOP and who militarizes the police more. Go-
Please provide links to compare Dem funding vs. the GOP and who militarizes the police more. Go-
January 25, 2026 at 1:41 AM
That would be the GOP.
Please provide links to compare Dem funding vs. the GOP and who militarizes the police more. Go-
Please provide links to compare Dem funding vs. the GOP and who militarizes the police more. Go-
Nope! You keep proving you don't care about the rule of law or 100s of thousands of poor people starving, so you have established you have NO credibility. Owned.
January 25, 2026 at 1:40 AM
Nope! You keep proving you don't care about the rule of law or 100s of thousands of poor people starving, so you have established you have NO credibility. Owned.
Here's someone who did a lot to speak out against Trump. That doesn't make them cabinet material but you asked for one. Now confirm what I said is correct- go.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_...
Olivia Troye - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
January 25, 2026 at 1:39 AM
Here's someone who did a lot to speak out against Trump. That doesn't make them cabinet material but you asked for one. Now confirm what I said is correct- go.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_...
Given that Trump is WORSE on Gaza, and that Trump is undermining democracy and the rule of law, I refuse to accept the Gaza situation as any excuse in not voting for Harris.
Thanks for confirming you don't care about democracy and have no argument.
Thanks for confirming you don't care about democracy and have no argument.
January 25, 2026 at 1:37 AM
Given that Trump is WORSE on Gaza, and that Trump is undermining democracy and the rule of law, I refuse to accept the Gaza situation as any excuse in not voting for Harris.
Thanks for confirming you don't care about democracy and have no argument.
Thanks for confirming you don't care about democracy and have no argument.
Nope! Because 1) Harris was clearly superior to Trump and 2) Trump was clearly a threat to democracy and the rule of law.
Anyone who couldn't see that wasn't looking. In a democracy it is up to the citizen to do the bare minimum and that was within the bare minimum.
Anyone who couldn't see that wasn't looking. In a democracy it is up to the citizen to do the bare minimum and that was within the bare minimum.
January 25, 2026 at 1:36 AM
Nope! Because 1) Harris was clearly superior to Trump and 2) Trump was clearly a threat to democracy and the rule of law.
Anyone who couldn't see that wasn't looking. In a democracy it is up to the citizen to do the bare minimum and that was within the bare minimum.
Anyone who couldn't see that wasn't looking. In a democracy it is up to the citizen to do the bare minimum and that was within the bare minimum.
Except you are bringing nothing specific about that.
What way do "people" think it currently works?
What do "people" say that they want?
What way do "people" think it currently works?
What do "people" say that they want?
January 25, 2026 at 1:34 AM
Except you are bringing nothing specific about that.
What way do "people" think it currently works?
What do "people" say that they want?
What way do "people" think it currently works?
What do "people" say that they want?
The only thing that matters was that Harris was superior to Trump. And we have confirmed that. The end.
January 25, 2026 at 1:33 AM
The only thing that matters was that Harris was superior to Trump. And we have confirmed that. The end.