Ms. MishMash
@msmishmash.bsky.social
lurker gurl
<a href="https://www.flaticon.com/free-icons/girl" title="girl icons">Girl icons created by Freepik - Flaticon</a>
<a href="https://www.flaticon.com/free-icons/girl" title="girl icons">Girl icons created by Freepik - Flaticon</a>
Right, while thousands continue to die daily on the UKR front lines as efforts - sincere and not - are expended to put a stop to that, you want to talk about hair?
Sad, silly, superficial people
@drwilke.social.bsky
Sad, silly, superficial people
@drwilke.social.bsky
December 16, 2025 at 3:08 AM
Right, while thousands continue to die daily on the UKR front lines as efforts - sincere and not - are expended to put a stop to that, you want to talk about hair?
Sad, silly, superficial people
@drwilke.social.bsky
Sad, silly, superficial people
@drwilke.social.bsky
Nah, the offender here is in short sleeves, the room seems normally heated to me
December 13, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Nah, the offender here is in short sleeves, the room seems normally heated to me
Leaving aside just what we define here as "Europe" ...
Who appointed YOU Judge to decide whether any given nation or individual belongs?
For some reason @szabolcspanyi.bsky.social follows you, maybe I should ask him
Who appointed YOU Judge to decide whether any given nation or individual belongs?
For some reason @szabolcspanyi.bsky.social follows you, maybe I should ask him
December 13, 2025 at 4:21 PM
Leaving aside just what we define here as "Europe" ...
Who appointed YOU Judge to decide whether any given nation or individual belongs?
For some reason @szabolcspanyi.bsky.social follows you, maybe I should ask him
Who appointed YOU Judge to decide whether any given nation or individual belongs?
For some reason @szabolcspanyi.bsky.social follows you, maybe I should ask him
I'm no fan of Trump or the GOP, but: SO absurd😆!
First of all, there are many "Republicans" political parties in the world!
But yeah, you probably mean US ... and so you say they are all aiming for a child abuse future, is that right?
Ah the silly people on here ...
First of all, there are many "Republicans" political parties in the world!
But yeah, you probably mean US ... and so you say they are all aiming for a child abuse future, is that right?
Ah the silly people on here ...
December 13, 2025 at 4:19 PM
I'm no fan of Trump or the GOP, but: SO absurd😆!
First of all, there are many "Republicans" political parties in the world!
But yeah, you probably mean US ... and so you say they are all aiming for a child abuse future, is that right?
Ah the silly people on here ...
First of all, there are many "Republicans" political parties in the world!
But yeah, you probably mean US ... and so you say they are all aiming for a child abuse future, is that right?
Ah the silly people on here ...
Yeah yeah, we've seen that all before🥱 ...
Thing is: you were SO close! Put that in proper haiku form (5 - 7 - 5 syllables) & then you'd be offering something actually original here!
Thing is: you were SO close! Put that in proper haiku form (5 - 7 - 5 syllables) & then you'd be offering something actually original here!
December 13, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Yeah yeah, we've seen that all before🥱 ...
Thing is: you were SO close! Put that in proper haiku form (5 - 7 - 5 syllables) & then you'd be offering something actually original here!
Thing is: you were SO close! Put that in proper haiku form (5 - 7 - 5 syllables) & then you'd be offering something actually original here!
Entirely irrelevant, this thread is about Obamacare;
If you have this earth-shaking news report, why don't you put it out as your own post, rather than putting it where it does not belong?
If you have this earth-shaking news report, why don't you put it out as your own post, rather than putting it where it does not belong?
December 13, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Entirely irrelevant, this thread is about Obamacare;
If you have this earth-shaking news report, why don't you put it out as your own post, rather than putting it where it does not belong?
If you have this earth-shaking news report, why don't you put it out as your own post, rather than putting it where it does not belong?
"snynore" You must be referring to Eeyore's brother, but why do you address him here, how is he any sort of relevant audience?
December 13, 2025 at 4:07 PM
"snynore" You must be referring to Eeyore's brother, but why do you address him here, how is he any sort of relevant audience?
In effect you're saying: "Actually, people don't always write so that other people know what they mean" - interesting concept!
December 13, 2025 at 4:00 PM
In effect you're saying: "Actually, people don't always write so that other people know what they mean" - interesting concept!
"up to date" - cool! Unfortunately, you just cannot traipse into the EU and expect to be allowed to live there! You get a 3-month tourist visa, fine - better use that time wisely to find some employer willing to hire/sponsor you; note that they have to consider EU-citizen job-candidates first
December 13, 2025 at 1:34 PM
"up to date" - cool! Unfortunately, you just cannot traipse into the EU and expect to be allowed to live there! You get a 3-month tourist visa, fine - better use that time wisely to find some employer willing to hire/sponsor you; note that they have to consider EU-citizen job-candidates first
Is that so? Well, 'sankee very much!
December 13, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Is that so? Well, 'sankee very much!
WHOOPS! You just went thru a time-warp (or else your reading comprehension skills aren't tops), for THIS thread is about the United Kingdom, no "MAGA" to be seen there
December 13, 2025 at 1:30 PM
WHOOPS! You just went thru a time-warp (or else your reading comprehension skills aren't tops), for THIS thread is about the United Kingdom, no "MAGA" to be seen there
... and THOSE would be?? Is this even relevant to this thread?
December 13, 2025 at 1:27 PM
... and THOSE would be?? Is this even relevant to this thread?
Not at all, see reply by @fcntl.bsky.social and also consider the fact that the Conservatives never presented precisely what Brexit was supposed to mean (likely had no agreed-upon definition even among themselves) so people had nothing to vote against
December 13, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Not at all, see reply by @fcntl.bsky.social and also consider the fact that the Conservatives never presented precisely what Brexit was supposed to mean (likely had no agreed-upon definition even among themselves) so people had nothing to vote against
Oh so "trans women rights" is what stands in the way of Britain rejoining?
What extreme solipsism (= assuming your own private concerns are paramount everywhere else)! You'll rather find that economics & policy are key to the question
What extreme solipsism (= assuming your own private concerns are paramount everywhere else)! You'll rather find that economics & policy are key to the question
December 13, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Oh so "trans women rights" is what stands in the way of Britain rejoining?
What extreme solipsism (= assuming your own private concerns are paramount everywhere else)! You'll rather find that economics & policy are key to the question
What extreme solipsism (= assuming your own private concerns are paramount everywhere else)! You'll rather find that economics & policy are key to the question
I take it you don't like him😳?
Too bad you'll convince no one else with this vulgar, evidence- and argument-free rant
Too bad you'll convince no one else with this vulgar, evidence- and argument-free rant
December 13, 2025 at 1:17 PM
I take it you don't like him😳?
Too bad you'll convince no one else with this vulgar, evidence- and argument-free rant
Too bad you'll convince no one else with this vulgar, evidence- and argument-free rant
Ah so "red states," huh?
Anyone can see this for the absurdly over-generalized, zero-info-value-added statement that it is!
There's really rather too much of this sort of people going on here about what they really don't anything about
Anyone can see this for the absurdly over-generalized, zero-info-value-added statement that it is!
There's really rather too much of this sort of people going on here about what they really don't anything about
December 13, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Ah so "red states," huh?
Anyone can see this for the absurdly over-generalized, zero-info-value-added statement that it is!
There's really rather too much of this sort of people going on here about what they really don't anything about
Anyone can see this for the absurdly over-generalized, zero-info-value-added statement that it is!
There's really rather too much of this sort of people going on here about what they really don't anything about
"hid": I'm not aware of any "hiding," it's rather all been out in the open ... could you give an example?
December 13, 2025 at 1:06 PM
"hid": I'm not aware of any "hiding," it's rather all been out in the open ... could you give an example?
No: high-speed fighters (too fast to bomb accurately) are not what you want for internal repression
The REAL scandal: Turkey has those RU S-400s, disappntng in UKR yet OWNING oppostn aircraft discloses to you (to RU) tech secrets enabling S-400 to more effectively shoot those oppostn aircraft down!
The REAL scandal: Turkey has those RU S-400s, disappntng in UKR yet OWNING oppostn aircraft discloses to you (to RU) tech secrets enabling S-400 to more effectively shoot those oppostn aircraft down!
December 11, 2025 at 7:13 PM
No: high-speed fighters (too fast to bomb accurately) are not what you want for internal repression
The REAL scandal: Turkey has those RU S-400s, disappntng in UKR yet OWNING oppostn aircraft discloses to you (to RU) tech secrets enabling S-400 to more effectively shoot those oppostn aircraft down!
The REAL scandal: Turkey has those RU S-400s, disappntng in UKR yet OWNING oppostn aircraft discloses to you (to RU) tech secrets enabling S-400 to more effectively shoot those oppostn aircraft down!
Fine, but I imagine that was really no problem ...
The beast likely just swam away to go "slumming" a bit among his rather-less regal friends🦭, of which I am sure there were many in the Thames back in those days
The beast likely just swam away to go "slumming" a bit among his rather-less regal friends🦭, of which I am sure there were many in the Thames back in those days
December 11, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Fine, but I imagine that was really no problem ...
The beast likely just swam away to go "slumming" a bit among his rather-less regal friends🦭, of which I am sure there were many in the Thames back in those days
The beast likely just swam away to go "slumming" a bit among his rather-less regal friends🦭, of which I am sure there were many in the Thames back in those days
You misunderstand this news piece. The DA change in posture has zero to do with any US intelligence laxness, rather with the US starting to strong-arm allies, as in the recent NSS
Oh & US Intel is actually the dominant entity w/in the whole 5 Eyes structure: it "keeps track," is not "kept track of"
Oh & US Intel is actually the dominant entity w/in the whole 5 Eyes structure: it "keeps track," is not "kept track of"
December 11, 2025 at 12:59 PM
You misunderstand this news piece. The DA change in posture has zero to do with any US intelligence laxness, rather with the US starting to strong-arm allies, as in the recent NSS
Oh & US Intel is actually the dominant entity w/in the whole 5 Eyes structure: it "keeps track," is not "kept track of"
Oh & US Intel is actually the dominant entity w/in the whole 5 Eyes structure: it "keeps track," is not "kept track of"
You misunderstand this news piece - did you even read it (recommended)?
This change in posture has zero to do with any US intelligence laxness, but rather with the US "increasingly prioritizing its own interests" to strong-arm allies, as expressed in the NSS document released last week
This change in posture has zero to do with any US intelligence laxness, but rather with the US "increasingly prioritizing its own interests" to strong-arm allies, as expressed in the NSS document released last week
December 11, 2025 at 12:55 PM
You misunderstand this news piece - did you even read it (recommended)?
This change in posture has zero to do with any US intelligence laxness, but rather with the US "increasingly prioritizing its own interests" to strong-arm allies, as expressed in the NSS document released last week
This change in posture has zero to do with any US intelligence laxness, but rather with the US "increasingly prioritizing its own interests" to strong-arm allies, as expressed in the NSS document released last week
Nice! But you gotta make sure you don't miss that moment, only comes around once a week - quit playing with your pecker and start paying attention😃!
December 11, 2025 at 10:52 AM
Nice! But you gotta make sure you don't miss that moment, only comes around once a week - quit playing with your pecker and start paying attention😃!
"I created the system" - SURE you did, bud! Guess what? Right now you are in the privileged position of interacting with ME, the Queen of France!
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
December 9, 2025 at 12:18 AM
"I created the system" - SURE you did, bud! Guess what? Right now you are in the privileged position of interacting with ME, the Queen of France!
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
SUCH ignorance on display!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
December 8, 2025 at 4:33 PM
SUCH ignorance on display!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
Oh, think again! You TOO could have used a little looking-up (EASY on the Internet) of what "treason" actually means before going public
December 8, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Oh, think again! You TOO could have used a little looking-up (EASY on the Internet) of what "treason" actually means before going public