Michael Smith
banner
msmith750.bsky.social
Michael Smith
@msmith750.bsky.social
Associate professor of law at University of Oklahoma College of Law. Researching constitutional law, criminal law, and legal oddities.
https://law.ou.edu/node/716
It's only been a couple days; slow down and enjoy life
February 10, 2026 at 6:12 PM
Also, what the hell is this
February 10, 2026 at 5:43 PM
For details on why I think that Dobbs is not an originalist opinion (certainly not in the mold of Heller), see: www.albanylawreview.org/article/6784... at IV.B.
ABANDONING ORIGINAL MEANING | Published in Albany Law Review
By Michael L. Smith. This article argues the United States Supreme Court has abandoned the original public meaning approach in its recent opinions in Bruen, Dobbs, and Kennedy.
www.albanylawreview.org
February 10, 2026 at 5:43 PM
Top of the journal bucket list! Thank you!!
February 10, 2026 at 1:38 AM
Oops! Good catch!!
February 10, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Comments are welcome! Thanks to @noahchauvin.bsky.social, @alexklein.bsky.social, @sawilliams.bsky.social, @eczoldan.bsky.social, and others who've already given helpful feedback. If you know any people who resemble my fictional coauthors, please don't put me in touch with them.
February 9, 2026 at 1:43 PM
It wasn't always easy working with these people, but the end result is worth it. I've included attorneys, judges, clients, students, professors, and sovereign citizens. They've convinced me the error of my earlier, AI-skeptical ways.

(Be sure to read the footnotes; lots happening there)
February 9, 2026 at 1:43 PM
Good catch, "Robert."
February 8, 2026 at 11:26 PM
I don't use them much, but occasionally they're helpful for suggestions on how a case that seems a bit out of place can fit in with the surrounding material. Also, some books (Dressler's crim pro) have note questions re lower court cases; the manual is a quick way to summarize those case outcomes.
February 7, 2026 at 6:21 PM
slamming the extra dollar down so hard the counter cracks
February 7, 2026 at 1:42 AM