It's just weird to impart malice onto NB pronouns by default when it's usually, at worst, a misguided attempt at inclusivity.
It's just weird to impart malice onto NB pronouns by default when it's usually, at worst, a misguided attempt at inclusivity.
"There's someone at the door for you."
"What do they want?"
It's a trivial example, but the idea that they/them can't ever be neutral is bizarrely insular and prescriptivist.
"There's someone at the door for you."
"What do they want?"
It's a trivial example, but the idea that they/them can't ever be neutral is bizarrely insular and prescriptivist.
I agree people should be okay with being corrected, but *assuming* they are, I don't think they/them is a bad default.
I agree people should be okay with being corrected, but *assuming* they are, I don't think they/them is a bad default.
If this really was about a real and genuinely malicious event, then I'm sorry about that. Otherwise, I stand by everything I've said and do think the trend towards NB language is a broadly positive tendency.
If this really was about a real and genuinely malicious event, then I'm sorry about that. Otherwise, I stand by everything I've said and do think the trend towards NB language is a broadly positive tendency.
I do not know the people on the TV, it's easy to forget the nuances of their lives.
I do not know the people on the TV, it's easy to forget the nuances of their lives.
People are fucking idiots about gender and the basic thought pattern of "oh I think this person is not cis, so I should try not to assume their gender" is practically saintly.
People are fucking idiots about gender and the basic thought pattern of "oh I think this person is not cis, so I should try not to assume their gender" is practically saintly.
I don't interact with the people on the TV.
I don't interact with the people on the TV.