interacting with dogshit media is so important. Not like 7/10 media either, like actual DOGSHIT. It's good to watch the worst sometimes.

This is 100% correct. imo you really aren't even a position to determine what *is* good if you haven't been exposed to the bad, the mediocre, and the unrealized.

STR 11
DEX 10
CON 8
INT 16
WIS 4
CHA 12

Tried to balance my arrogance and self loathing to get what I think is an honest assessment

I wrote this in a reply, but theres a massive irony in the fact the he's appealing to that sophistication himself while sharing ideas as infintile as "durr this whole medium is stupid"

The irony here is that you yourself in making this post are appealing to the trappings of sophistication without actually engaging in sophisticated thought about the subject you're discussing.

The serious question is to ask what a work manages to achieve within its medium. Or would you also disparage Michelangelo's David because it can't capture the human body as accurately as a 3D scan and print?

There is no question of "how well a medium can tell a story," either. Lets put subjectivity aside for a moment--using an imperfect medium to tell a story is inherently a worthwhile artistic pursuit. "Are books better than movies" is just not a serious intellectual debate, and neither is this.

Absolutely rancid take, my guy. This is like saying the interesting and sophisticated thing about photography is how clearly it can capture an image, or architecture is valued solely for its function. Each an important aspect, to be sure, but hardly the only one and often not the main one.

Bride's Story spotted

Is the claim here seriously that mommy and daddy payment processors need to separate full grown men and women from the horrors of seeing "blood and mutilation" in their horror game?

These hypothetical people have never seen an R rated film, I guess

I agree

I was once told I had expensive taste because I liked shopping at Express lol

It's giving

Building a time machine to 1982. I just want to talk.