Jeremy Duncan
@nacnud.bsky.social
Former Marine, disgruntled socialist, IPv6 nerd, co-founder of Tachyon Dynamics, UTSA alumnus, and overall social media nihilist. Volunteer firefighter in training. 🚒 probably in the midst of a full throttle midlife crisis. Ham radio 📻 KR4CPB.
I'm pretty new with it, but I only hear a few garbled checks on the 10-10 daily net on 28.380. On top of that I'm not 100% confident in my whole setup.
April 11, 2025 at 1:53 AM
I'm pretty new with it, but I only hear a few garbled checks on the 10-10 daily net on 28.380. On top of that I'm not 100% confident in my whole setup.
Go to hamstudy.org they have an app too I just passed my tech exam yesterday. That way you don't need to go to a class.
HamStudy.org: Cutting edge amateur radio study toolsHamstudy
Free ham radio flash cards, practice tests, and question pools as well as introduction to ham radio and explanations for questions.
hamstudy.org
March 23, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Go to hamstudy.org they have an app too I just passed my tech exam yesterday. That way you don't need to go to a class.
It's not hard to use. It's just different. It's easy to learn. Just adding a bunch of octets to the v4 header is going to have to get implemented in hardware and software somewhere. You think migration for v6 is long...
March 15, 2025 at 11:21 PM
It's not hard to use. It's just different. It's easy to learn. Just adding a bunch of octets to the v4 header is going to have to get implemented in hardware and software somewhere. You think migration for v6 is long...
Why use ULA? Can you not get GUA from your provider? Unless this is a v6 only system you may end up with unexpected behavior with the prefix policy table. See here: datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie...
Prioritizing known-local IPv6 ULAs through address selection policy
This document draws on several years of operational experience to update RFC 6724, defining the concept of "known-local" ULA prefixes that enable ULA-to-ULA communications within fd00::/8 to become pr...
datatracker.ietf.org
March 13, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Why use ULA? Can you not get GUA from your provider? Unless this is a v6 only system you may end up with unexpected behavior with the prefix policy table. See here: datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie...
It's probably because your mail server is not in your domain's SPF record. I had the same issue last year with Google and my mail seever.
March 7, 2025 at 4:16 AM
It's probably because your mail server is not in your domain's SPF record. I had the same issue last year with Google and my mail seever.
Wow... di you have other ISP options in your area or is that it?
February 12, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Wow... di you have other ISP options in your area or is that it?
Have you ever asked them their status or roadway? I can't see anything online
February 11, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Have you ever asked them their status or roadway? I can't see anything online
Who is your ISP currently?
February 11, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Who is your ISP currently?
There's always Hurricane Electric. They provide 6in4 tunnels that most endpoint CE routers have support for. tunnelbroker.net
Hurricane Electric Free IPv6 Tunnel Broker
tunnelbroker.net
February 11, 2025 at 2:02 PM
There's always Hurricane Electric. They provide 6in4 tunnels that most endpoint CE routers have support for. tunnelbroker.net
What i mean it's misleading to say one is better than the other. It's like saying Leaded vs. Unleaded Gasoline: which is better? There may be some positive things with IPv4, but we shouldn't be counting on them because it's going away.
February 11, 2025 at 1:59 PM
What i mean it's misleading to say one is better than the other. It's like saying Leaded vs. Unleaded Gasoline: which is better? There may be some positive things with IPv4, but we shouldn't be counting on them because it's going away.
It's not one or the other. IPv4 is a legacy protocol that IPv6 is going to replace. The IETF has designated it as such. And also you may be using old information, as IPsec is not mandatory for IPv6. See RFC 8200, etc.
February 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM
It's not one or the other. IPv4 is a legacy protocol that IPv6 is going to replace. The IETF has designated it as such. And also you may be using old information, as IPsec is not mandatory for IPv6. See RFC 8200, etc.