Nadav Borenstein
@nadavb.bsky.social
1.7K followers 340 following 7 posts
PhD fellow in Natural Language Processing @ Copenhagen
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Nadav Borenstein
nlp-amelie.bsky.social
Crowdsourcing datasets is very common, but how much of those results come from LLMs these days? How can we prevent it? Much of it is unclear. This is why we’re conducing a survey (~10 min) to gather community experiences, challenges, and solutions.
Share your thoughts 👉https://tinyurl.com/39ab55wf
Qualtrics Survey | Qualtrics Experience Management
The most powerful, simple and trusted way to gather experience data. Start your journey to experience management and try a free account today.
ugent.qualtrics.com
nadavb.bsky.social
If you are attending #ACL2025, come and check out our cool poster on Wednesday at 11 am!

(Oh yeah, I forgot to announce that the paper got accepted to the main proceedings of #ACL2025, oops)
nadavb.bsky.social
I am happy to share that the paper got accepted to the main proceedings of ACL 2025 in Vienna! See you there!

arxiv.org/abs/2502.14132
Reposted by Nadav Borenstein
iaugenstein.bsky.social
Massive congrats to @nadavb.bsky.social for passing his PhD defence yesterday! 👏👏👏
Thanks to Anders Søgaard, @radamihalcea.bsky.social @ricosennrich.bsky.social for serving as examiners.
You can find his thesis here, which the committee characterised as "a joy to read": arxiv.org/abs/2503.07395
nadavb.bsky.social
This, in turn, will limit the efficacy of community notes, particularly for high-stakes claims related to health and broader conspiracy narratives.

Work done with @gretawarren.bsky.social, @delliott.bsky.social, and @iaugenstein.bsky.social.
nadavb.bsky.social
Fact-checkers conduct in-depth research beyond the reach of amateur users, while community notes publicise their work. The move to end partnerships and funding for fact-checking agencies will hinder their ability to pursue investigative journalism, which community note writers rely on.
Fig. 3. strategies in debunking claims related to broader nar-
ratives. (b) the different ways in which fact-checking sources
are used to debunk claims. 

Fig. 4. Distribution of notes’ topics, with and without a fact-
checking source.

Fig. 5. Percentage of samples related to a broader narrative or
conspiracy vs. have a fact-checking source.
nadavb.bsky.social
This work examines how this recent development might impact the efforts to combat misinformation spread on social media by studying fact-checking’s role in Twitter’s community notes.

We find that community notes and professional fact-checking are deeply interconnected:
nadavb.bsky.social
The current political climate has prompted Meta to shift away from partnerships with fact-checkers to increased reliance on crowdsourced community notes—the model used by Twitter.
nadavb.bsky.social
🚨 Preprint alert 🚨

𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐭-𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬?

(arxiv.org/abs/2502.14132)

Fact-checking agencies have come under intense scrutiny in recent months regarding their role in combating misinformation on social media.
Can Community Notes Replace Professional Fact-Checkers? Work done by Nadav Borenstein, Greta Warren, Desmond Elliott, and Isabelle Augenstein.
Reposted by Nadav Borenstein
copenlu.bsky.social
Hello, world! We're a Natural Language Understanding group at the University of Copenhagen (faculty: @iaugenstein.bsky.social, @apepa.bsky.social). Follow us for updates about our research, open positions, and more!
More about us: www.copenlu.com
#NLP #NLProc #ML #XAI