Nancy McRay
LightNews LightNews
nancy-anne.bsky.social
Nancy McRay
@nancy-anne.bsky.social
410 followers 860 following 190 posts
Fiber artist living in the little finger of Michigan.
Nancy-McRay.squarespace.com
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Nancy McRay
cwebbonline.com
And why they think it’s “strong” strategy to bomb random boats carrying low-level traffickers instead of capturing them for intelligence, while the actual cartel leadership keeps operating untouched. This is not really about drugs.
December 22, 2025 at 11:04 PM
nancy-anne.bsky.social
Wouldn’t it be fun if the only show that got ratings on cbs in the next five months was The Late Show?
December 22, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Reposted by Nancy McRay
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Again, from Michael Grynbaum, here is Sharyn Alfonsi's full email.

It must be read:
News Team, Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier. I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity. Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one. We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story. If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a "kill switch" for any reporting they find inconvenient. If the standard for airing a story becomes "the government must agree to be interviewed," then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast. We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state. These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless. CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that "low point." By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones. We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it. When it fails to air without a credible explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of "Gold Standard" reputation for a single week of political quiet. I care too much about this broadcast to watch it be dismantled without a fight. Sharyn
December 22, 2025 at 4:00 AM
Reposted by Nancy McRay
zensoul.bsky.social
Picture of a rich man with a plate full of money, stuffing his face with the money captioned “poverty exists not because we can’t feed the poor but because we can’t satisfy the rich“.
December 11, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Reposted by Nancy McRay
sueric.bsky.social
I work in healthcare. Staff is being cut to “save money” and those who get to keep their jobs are expected to work 10 hour days. The guys at the top are paid quite nicely on our backs. This is not sustainable.
December 9, 2025 at 5:27 PM