Naomi Oreskes
banner
naomioreskes.bsky.social
Naomi Oreskes
@naomioreskes.bsky.social
Historian, Earth Scientist, Writer, Public Intellectual. Loves: Chocolate, Red Wine, Skiing. Hates: Beets
Great piece. Thanks for re-sharing
December 17, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Plus ca change…
December 17, 2025 at 3:37 PM
I glad to know there are still “GOP moderates.”
December 17, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Looks like the link didn’t work . Anyone else having this problem?
December 17, 2025 at 3:35 PM
yep
December 8, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Hello? Now? Not half a century ago???
December 8, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Some people have spent decades trying to explain away altruism, and even cooperation, in nature. But it’s everywhere. And we are almost all holobionts.
December 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Yes, we requested retraction and editor agreed.
December 8, 2025 at 3:45 PM
The paper was retracted last week. See coverage on Le Monde, WaPo , NPR and elsewhere.
December 8, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Yet US EPA claims it had no influence!
December 8, 2025 at 3:43 PM
It’s not their fault.
People have been sold a bill of goods. Hopefully we can restore scientific integrity in this and other places.
December 8, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Proving it isn’t just about cost.
November 24, 2025 at 3:24 PM
YEP. People definitely get addicted to the limelight. Especially in academia, where financial rewards may be modest... and attention is the coin of the realm.
November 17, 2025 at 10:34 PM
It's worse than this article implies. Epstein focused on work highlighting the genetic basis of stuff. I'd call it genetic determinist- adjacent... veering into eugenic -adjacent...which supports his notion of inborn (mostly male) genius. Genes matter, but so do many other things.
November 17, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Yep, we did know. Or, at least, the people accepting his money knew.
November 17, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Glad to see old work still relevant (well, actually sad to see it still relevant, but glad to see it being read and used).
November 17, 2025 at 10:25 PM