Nelly
@nellyp.bsky.social
Directrice des opérations @lessurligneurs.bsky.social, co-fondatrice de @checkfirst.network et avant red chef Journalistes solidaires - disinfo, influence ops, algos.
Reposted by Nelly
4. Civil society and community fact-checkers did the heavy lifting.
Much of the evidence came from communities countering disinformation, who reported, documented, and alerted the authorities. Any fines collected should be channelled back into supporting this chronically underfunded field.
Much of the evidence came from communities countering disinformation, who reported, documented, and alerted the authorities. Any fines collected should be channelled back into supporting this chronically underfunded field.
December 5, 2025 at 11:33 AM
4. Civil society and community fact-checkers did the heavy lifting.
Much of the evidence came from communities countering disinformation, who reported, documented, and alerted the authorities. Any fines collected should be channelled back into supporting this chronically underfunded field.
Much of the evidence came from communities countering disinformation, who reported, documented, and alerted the authorities. Any fines collected should be channelled back into supporting this chronically underfunded field.
Reposted by Nelly
3. Malicious semi-compliance must have consequences.
Rogue behaviour, foot-dragging, or “checkbox” compliance designed to evade the spirit of the law should trigger stronger sanctions, including higher fines.
An anti-compliance shield is needed.
Rogue behaviour, foot-dragging, or “checkbox” compliance designed to evade the spirit of the law should trigger stronger sanctions, including higher fines.
An anti-compliance shield is needed.
December 5, 2025 at 11:33 AM
3. Malicious semi-compliance must have consequences.
Rogue behaviour, foot-dragging, or “checkbox” compliance designed to evade the spirit of the law should trigger stronger sanctions, including higher fines.
An anti-compliance shield is needed.
Rogue behaviour, foot-dragging, or “checkbox” compliance designed to evade the spirit of the law should trigger stronger sanctions, including higher fines.
An anti-compliance shield is needed.
Reposted by Nelly
2. The goal of the DSA isn’t to collect fines.
But voluntary measures have shown their limit.
Its purpose is to change company behaviour and toxic business models. What matters now is whether X adapts its systems to comply with the rules Europeans have sovereignly decided.
But voluntary measures have shown their limit.
Its purpose is to change company behaviour and toxic business models. What matters now is whether X adapts its systems to comply with the rules Europeans have sovereignly decided.
December 5, 2025 at 11:33 AM
2. The goal of the DSA isn’t to collect fines.
But voluntary measures have shown their limit.
Its purpose is to change company behaviour and toxic business models. What matters now is whether X adapts its systems to comply with the rules Europeans have sovereignly decided.
But voluntary measures have shown their limit.
Its purpose is to change company behaviour and toxic business models. What matters now is whether X adapts its systems to comply with the rules Europeans have sovereignly decided.
Reposted by Nelly
1. This is only the beginning.
X will certainly appeal. The Commission must stay firm in enforcement — and civil society must also keep up the pressure. Building case law takes time, and both regulators and watchdogs need to hold the line.
X will certainly appeal. The Commission must stay firm in enforcement — and civil society must also keep up the pressure. Building case law takes time, and both regulators and watchdogs need to hold the line.
December 5, 2025 at 11:33 AM
1. This is only the beginning.
X will certainly appeal. The Commission must stay firm in enforcement — and civil society must also keep up the pressure. Building case law takes time, and both regulators and watchdogs need to hold the line.
X will certainly appeal. The Commission must stay firm in enforcement — and civil society must also keep up the pressure. Building case law takes time, and both regulators and watchdogs need to hold the line.