Ne Moe Imya
@nemoeimya.bsky.social
Join my campaign to get football journalists to report transfers in terms of Total Cost/Season!
(Transfer Fee + Agents Fees)/Years of Contract + Wages = Total Player Cost/Season
(Transfer Fee + Agents Fees)/Years of Contract + Wages = Total Player Cost/Season
The Robbies had a podcast the other day where I believe one of them said he was better than Phil Foden.
a little girl with blonde hair is sitting in a car seat .
ALT: a little girl with blonde hair is sitting in a car seat .
media.tenor.com
December 21, 2025 at 7:03 PM
The Robbies had a podcast the other day where I believe one of them said he was better than Phil Foden.
The Real Answers To Your Question: Fofana, Akliouche
The Still Kids But Could Be?: Diomande, Mbaye, Fernandez-Pardo
The Spend Even MORE options: Barcola🚀, Guler 😶, Minteh (?)
The Lets Try Another Eintracht Player: Bahoya
The Still Kids But Could Be?: Diomande, Mbaye, Fernandez-Pardo
The Spend Even MORE options: Barcola🚀, Guler 😶, Minteh (?)
The Lets Try Another Eintracht Player: Bahoya
December 18, 2025 at 3:32 AM
The Real Answers To Your Question: Fofana, Akliouche
The Still Kids But Could Be?: Diomande, Mbaye, Fernandez-Pardo
The Spend Even MORE options: Barcola🚀, Guler 😶, Minteh (?)
The Lets Try Another Eintracht Player: Bahoya
The Still Kids But Could Be?: Diomande, Mbaye, Fernandez-Pardo
The Spend Even MORE options: Barcola🚀, Guler 😶, Minteh (?)
The Lets Try Another Eintracht Player: Bahoya
I'm not sure I agree with this.
Frimpong getting where Kerkez here is a slight improvement over having Bradley play there. Isak moving from non-entity to the player he was last season at Newcastle takes us from 4th to competing with Arsenal for the title, unless everyone else drops off as a result.
Frimpong getting where Kerkez here is a slight improvement over having Bradley play there. Isak moving from non-entity to the player he was last season at Newcastle takes us from 4th to competing with Arsenal for the title, unless everyone else drops off as a result.
December 16, 2025 at 8:26 PM
I'm not sure I agree with this.
Frimpong getting where Kerkez here is a slight improvement over having Bradley play there. Isak moving from non-entity to the player he was last season at Newcastle takes us from 4th to competing with Arsenal for the title, unless everyone else drops off as a result.
Frimpong getting where Kerkez here is a slight improvement over having Bradley play there. Isak moving from non-entity to the player he was last season at Newcastle takes us from 4th to competing with Arsenal for the title, unless everyone else drops off as a result.
Under. I'd put the over/under at 2.5, personally.
December 11, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Under. I'd put the over/under at 2.5, personally.
I mean, I have been accused recently of being a huge Slot In person (because I think only 25% of what's happened this season is his fault) but if Xabi is out at Real we should definitely take the chance to upgrade IMO.
December 10, 2025 at 6:45 PM
I mean, I have been accused recently of being a huge Slot In person (because I think only 25% of what's happened this season is his fault) but if Xabi is out at Real we should definitely take the chance to upgrade IMO.
Gravenberch. But I think by the end of the season it'll be Florian.
December 10, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Gravenberch. But I think by the end of the season it'll be Florian.
If those are your two faves then yes, Carcassonne is a great option. Although I think the Hunter/Gatherer version is simpler and better, to be honest.
The others I'd recommend would be Ticket to Ride and Dominion. All easy (for board games!) to learn and lots of fun.
The others I'd recommend would be Ticket to Ride and Dominion. All easy (for board games!) to learn and lots of fun.
December 9, 2025 at 1:01 AM
If those are your two faves then yes, Carcassonne is a great option. Although I think the Hunter/Gatherer version is simpler and better, to be honest.
The others I'd recommend would be Ticket to Ride and Dominion. All easy (for board games!) to learn and lots of fun.
The others I'd recommend would be Ticket to Ride and Dominion. All easy (for board games!) to learn and lots of fun.
Can we get the fans to just boo, loudly, for the whole 3 minutes, every time this happens?
December 8, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Can we get the fans to just boo, loudly, for the whole 3 minutes, every time this happens?
He somehow got the entire story this summer to be about Liverpool not offering him a contract as well.
Managed to never once have anyone ask him "hang on, I'm sure they're offering you SOMETHING, could it be that your demands are on the high side?"
Managed to never once have anyone ask him "hang on, I'm sure they're offering you SOMETHING, could it be that your demands are on the high side?"
December 7, 2025 at 3:06 AM
He somehow got the entire story this summer to be about Liverpool not offering him a contract as well.
Managed to never once have anyone ask him "hang on, I'm sure they're offering you SOMETHING, could it be that your demands are on the high side?"
Managed to never once have anyone ask him "hang on, I'm sure they're offering you SOMETHING, could it be that your demands are on the high side?"
Our fans are insane.
Unless you're getting in Xabi Alonso, then whoever you bring in is clearly a massive downgrade from Slot. Crazy to even think of making a change.
Unless you're getting in Xabi Alonso, then whoever you bring in is clearly a massive downgrade from Slot. Crazy to even think of making a change.
December 7, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Our fans are insane.
Unless you're getting in Xabi Alonso, then whoever you bring in is clearly a massive downgrade from Slot. Crazy to even think of making a change.
Unless you're getting in Xabi Alonso, then whoever you bring in is clearly a massive downgrade from Slot. Crazy to even think of making a change.
BUT SLOT OUT POSTECOGLOU IN SELL ISAK WAAAAHHH!!
December 4, 2025 at 12:39 AM
BUT SLOT OUT POSTECOGLOU IN SELL ISAK WAAAAHHH!!
IF, in a hypothetical alternative universe, XX & XY chromosome pairs could compete equally, then there would only be a single division of sport.
However, since we live in a universe where that chromosome has significant bearing on athletic ability, we provide a second division for the XX-holders.
However, since we live in a universe where that chromosome has significant bearing on athletic ability, we provide a second division for the XX-holders.
December 4, 2025 at 12:09 AM
IF, in a hypothetical alternative universe, XX & XY chromosome pairs could compete equally, then there would only be a single division of sport.
However, since we live in a universe where that chromosome has significant bearing on athletic ability, we provide a second division for the XX-holders.
However, since we live in a universe where that chromosome has significant bearing on athletic ability, we provide a second division for the XX-holders.
This is intentionally obtuse.
The men's division is not divided - it is simply the best athletes competing against all the rest of the best athletes. The WOMENS division is separated out, so that those with XX-chromosome genetics (which disadvantage them) have a chance to win something.
The men's division is not divided - it is simply the best athletes competing against all the rest of the best athletes. The WOMENS division is separated out, so that those with XX-chromosome genetics (which disadvantage them) have a chance to win something.
December 4, 2025 at 12:08 AM
This is intentionally obtuse.
The men's division is not divided - it is simply the best athletes competing against all the rest of the best athletes. The WOMENS division is separated out, so that those with XX-chromosome genetics (which disadvantage them) have a chance to win something.
The men's division is not divided - it is simply the best athletes competing against all the rest of the best athletes. The WOMENS division is separated out, so that those with XX-chromosome genetics (which disadvantage them) have a chance to win something.
😂
It took me longer than I'd probably like to admit to realise that this was a parody quote!
It took me longer than I'd probably like to admit to realise that this was a parody quote!
December 3, 2025 at 3:29 AM
😂
It took me longer than I'd probably like to admit to realise that this was a parody quote!
It took me longer than I'd probably like to admit to realise that this was a parody quote!
And, I should clarify, THIS IS A GOOD THING. Women's sports should exist!
December 3, 2025 at 3:27 AM
And, I should clarify, THIS IS A GOOD THING. Women's sports should exist!
Pretending that Phelps wasn't competing against the women's swimmers so we can't say for sure that he would beat them is silly. Every normal person understands that we divide sports into mens/womens events specifically so that the women have a chance to win something.
December 3, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Pretending that Phelps wasn't competing against the women's swimmers so we can't say for sure that he would beat them is silly. Every normal person understands that we divide sports into mens/womens events specifically so that the women have a chance to win something.
Yeah, but we divide the field so that the female athletes have a chance. Everyone knows that if we only had one category, the males would win almost every event, and the females wouldn't have a chance.
Ergo, we artificially divide the field so that the XX chromosome-holders have their own division.
Ergo, we artificially divide the field so that the XX chromosome-holders have their own division.
December 3, 2025 at 3:25 AM
Yeah, but we divide the field so that the female athletes have a chance. Everyone knows that if we only had one category, the males would win almost every event, and the females wouldn't have a chance.
Ergo, we artificially divide the field so that the XX chromosome-holders have their own division.
Ergo, we artificially divide the field so that the XX chromosome-holders have their own division.
I mean, I would have thought that was self-evident for 95% (or more?) of sporting endeavors? Are you saying you don't think that it is? Why else would women's sports even exist? Why not just have everyone compete together in a single category?
December 3, 2025 at 3:22 AM
I mean, I would have thought that was self-evident for 95% (or more?) of sporting endeavors? Are you saying you don't think that it is? Why else would women's sports even exist? Why not just have everyone compete together in a single category?
All of women's sports are artificially limited to half the population.
The argument we're having is whether that limitation should be based on genetic sex (fixed, gives huge athletic advantage) or gender (fluid, no fixed definition, many definitions aren't consistent w/who has genetic advantage).
The argument we're having is whether that limitation should be based on genetic sex (fixed, gives huge athletic advantage) or gender (fluid, no fixed definition, many definitions aren't consistent w/who has genetic advantage).
December 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
All of women's sports are artificially limited to half the population.
The argument we're having is whether that limitation should be based on genetic sex (fixed, gives huge athletic advantage) or gender (fluid, no fixed definition, many definitions aren't consistent w/who has genetic advantage).
The argument we're having is whether that limitation should be based on genetic sex (fixed, gives huge athletic advantage) or gender (fluid, no fixed definition, many definitions aren't consistent w/who has genetic advantage).
But in WOMENS sport, we've artificially limited the field to only half the population, on the basis of genetic disadvantages (a second X chromosome).
So to take someone who doesn't have that genetic disadvantage and allow them to participate anyway, it invalidates the entire category of the sport.
So to take someone who doesn't have that genetic disadvantage and allow them to participate anyway, it invalidates the entire category of the sport.
December 2, 2025 at 2:27 PM
But in WOMENS sport, we've artificially limited the field to only half the population, on the basis of genetic disadvantages (a second X chromosome).
So to take someone who doesn't have that genetic disadvantage and allow them to participate anyway, it invalidates the entire category of the sport.
So to take someone who doesn't have that genetic disadvantage and allow them to participate anyway, it invalidates the entire category of the sport.
The difference is obvious if you give this more than a second or two of thought.
Phelps is competing against every other human alive - there are no artificial restrictions, so his genetic advantages are just part of the sport.
Phelps is competing against every other human alive - there are no artificial restrictions, so his genetic advantages are just part of the sport.
December 2, 2025 at 2:25 PM
The difference is obvious if you give this more than a second or two of thought.
Phelps is competing against every other human alive - there are no artificial restrictions, so his genetic advantages are just part of the sport.
Phelps is competing against every other human alive - there are no artificial restrictions, so his genetic advantages are just part of the sport.
I mean, we have more or less the same evidence of Ronaldo raping a woman and almost everyone in the media is determined to forget and whitewash that, so I can't imagine Robinho being much different.
November 28, 2025 at 5:35 PM
I mean, we have more or less the same evidence of Ronaldo raping a woman and almost everyone in the media is determined to forget and whitewash that, so I can't imagine Robinho being much different.
This is an interesting take, mostly because I personally view "the players quitting on the pitch" as one of the main things that is mostly the fault of the manager in charge of said players.
November 24, 2025 at 6:45 PM
This is an interesting take, mostly because I personally view "the players quitting on the pitch" as one of the main things that is mostly the fault of the manager in charge of said players.