The Neoreactionary
@neoreactionary.bsky.social
Tracking Elon Musk, the Neoreactionaries, and the Dark Enlightenment
Very well written
August 14, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Very well written
“It is yet another enemy of the Enlightenment who have arisen to oppose this movement of conscience and knowledge. I think of ideologies of hate that want to separate people in reason of their origin, their gender, their religion, who in doing so attack the pillars of Republican reason and thought.”
May 7, 2025 at 3:16 PM
“It is yet another enemy of the Enlightenment who have arisen to oppose this movement of conscience and knowledge. I think of ideologies of hate that want to separate people in reason of their origin, their gender, their religion, who in doing so attack the pillars of Republican reason and thought.”
“To the liberty of men, the Dark Enlightenment opposes the force of reality. To equality of birth, the hierarchy of status. To universal brotherhood, the reign of war and predation. This ideological project is real, and through men and women, it intends to rule.”
May 7, 2025 at 3:16 PM
“To the liberty of men, the Dark Enlightenment opposes the force of reality. To equality of birth, the hierarchy of status. To universal brotherhood, the reign of war and predation. This ideological project is real, and through men and women, it intends to rule.”
“Nowadays, there is a new project, born in the United States, but which will, I don’t doubt it, plant seeds here in France and Europe—the explicit project of the Dark Enlightenment. These want to erase the legacy of three centuries at least of human progress.”
May 7, 2025 at 3:16 PM
“Nowadays, there is a new project, born in the United States, but which will, I don’t doubt it, plant seeds here in France and Europe—the explicit project of the Dark Enlightenment. These want to erase the legacy of three centuries at least of human progress.”
“There is a current zeitgeist where hatred expresses itself, with antisemitic rage and the furor of algorithms. Through the Freemasonry, it is, at bottom, the project of revolution and emancipation of which you are, with others, the guardians, that is targeted.”
May 7, 2025 at 3:16 PM
“There is a current zeitgeist where hatred expresses itself, with antisemitic rage and the furor of algorithms. Through the Freemasonry, it is, at bottom, the project of revolution and emancipation of which you are, with others, the guardians, that is targeted.”
Nihilistic narcissism*
May 7, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Nihilistic narcissism*
Moderator: “All right, perhaps we can get into closing statements. I think they've allotted five to 10. Perhaps it was eight minutes. Mr. Yarvin, if you'd like to start your closing remarks.”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Moderator: “All right, perhaps we can get into closing statements. I think they've allotted five to 10. Perhaps it was eight minutes. Mr. Yarvin, if you'd like to start your closing remarks.”
A: “Again, those things are mutually supportive of each other, and it is possible both to stand up for and defend values of academic freedom, intellectual freedom, and also to put yourself on a path of reform and renewal, we can defend by renovating. And that is, I believe, the path that we're on.”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
A: “Again, those things are mutually supportive of each other, and it is possible both to stand up for and defend values of academic freedom, intellectual freedom, and also to put yourself on a path of reform and renewal, we can defend by renovating. And that is, I believe, the path that we're on.”
A: “And the answer to that question is yes, and the reason for that answer is because we are very clear about core values. Those are values of Veritas. They are also values of pluralism.”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
A: “And the answer to that question is yes, and the reason for that answer is because we are very clear about core values. Those are values of Veritas. They are also values of pluralism.”
A: “But I think the important question here more broadly, to bring us back to our original resolution is whether or not this university in particular, is in a place where it can do work that is for the good of our society.”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
A: “But I think the important question here more broadly, to bring us back to our original resolution is whether or not this university in particular, is in a place where it can do work that is for the good of our society.”
A: “Yes, should science take a look at itself and consider how it's doing its work? Yes, I think all those things are the case, but sciences generally have established very high standards for their work and maintain a commitment to testing and evaluating what they're doing.”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
A: “Yes, should science take a look at itself and consider how it's doing its work? Yes, I think all those things are the case, but sciences generally have established very high standards for their work and maintain a commitment to testing and evaluating what they're doing.”
A: “Scientists do work according to a set of norms for inquiry that they that are high standard is short of it, and they hold each other to very high standard. They do put each other under intense competitive pressures. Is it possible that bureaucratic pressures also affect the how science unfolds?”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
A: “Scientists do work according to a set of norms for inquiry that they that are high standard is short of it, and they hold each other to very high standard. They do put each other under intense competitive pressures. Is it possible that bureaucratic pressures also affect the how science unfolds?”
Allen: “There's a lot there. I'm not going to respond to the whole picture. I think that's not what our resolution is about. But I will say a few things. I mean, for starters, science is a hard enterprise, and science is also a bureaucratic enterprise. Both of those things are true simultaneously.”
May 7, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Allen: “There's a lot there. I'm not going to respond to the whole picture. I think that's not what our resolution is about. But I will say a few things. I mean, for starters, science is a hard enterprise, and science is also a bureaucratic enterprise. Both of those things are true simultaneously.”
Moderator, to Allen: “Sure your thoughts Professor Allen, whether or not what he said is factually or historically correct if there's something structurally wrong which is producing what he claims to be the case about professors and academic elites of that sort.”
May 7, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Moderator, to Allen: “Sure your thoughts Professor Allen, whether or not what he said is factually or historically correct if there's something structurally wrong which is producing what he claims to be the case about professors and academic elites of that sort.”
Y: “It's involving the most powerful ideas, and in a way, the most pernicious ideas. And I can't help but relate that to professors Allen's belief that positive liberty, in other words, power, is an essential goal of human nature.”
May 7, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Y: “It's involving the most powerful ideas, and in a way, the most pernicious ideas. And I can't help but relate that to professors Allen's belief that positive liberty, in other words, power, is an essential goal of human nature.”
Y: “And I look at the basically Professor Allen was talking about the legacy of devastation that these policies have left over the last 50 years. They were all approved by the best social scientists of the time. I see the same effect where the system is not evolving the best and truest ideas.”
May 7, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Y: “And I look at the basically Professor Allen was talking about the legacy of devastation that these policies have left over the last 50 years. They were all approved by the best social scientists of the time. I see the same effect where the system is not evolving the best and truest ideas.”
Y: “You know, who benefits from expansion of NATO to the east? Well, I don't know who benefits, but I know a lot of people have died. How's that working out for you? Ukraine? You know, when I look at the social policies and of the 1960s which were supported by almost all academics.”
May 7, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Y: “You know, who benefits from expansion of NATO to the east? Well, I don't know who benefits, but I know a lot of people have died. How's that working out for you? Ukraine? You know, when I look at the social policies and of the 1960s which were supported by almost all academics.”
Y: “Peter Dazsak is like, Fine. We'll shut it down. We'll start a new org, different name should be fine. Actually, these people seem profoundly unaccountable. And if you look at the processes that gave them power, and really the power to create COVID, they seem very corrupt, and I see many things.”
May 7, 2025 at 12:44 PM
Y: “Peter Dazsak is like, Fine. We'll shut it down. We'll start a new org, different name should be fine. Actually, these people seem profoundly unaccountable. And if you look at the processes that gave them power, and really the power to create COVID, they seem very corrupt, and I see many things.”
Y: “You know, the people who really, honestly, right now, should be in jail for what they do, and instead, they have suffered little or no harm. Equa Health Alliance, which basically ran, you know, the research program. Or Peter dazak was disbarred, or, you know, they can't get grants anymore.”
May 7, 2025 at 4:51 AM
Y: “You know, the people who really, honestly, right now, should be in jail for what they do, and instead, they have suffered little or no harm. Equa Health Alliance, which basically ran, you know, the research program. Or Peter dazak was disbarred, or, you know, they can't get grants anymore.”
Y: “to be a good scientist today, to be an effective pi in the system, you have to be an empire builder. It's not me, right? Right? And so what we have is this generation of very effective bureaucrats. The Fauci is the route barracks, you know, Peter Daszak.”
May 7, 2025 at 4:51 AM
Y: “to be a good scientist today, to be an effective pi in the system, you have to be an empire builder. It's not me, right? Right? And so what we have is this generation of very effective bureaucrats. The Fauci is the route barracks, you know, Peter Daszak.”